Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is there a reason to get a 22-250 Remington?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by slowr1der, Jul 7, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. slowr1der

    slowr1der Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    961
    I have a chance to pick up a Savage Model 11 in 22-250 Remington for what looks to be a great deal. I'm very tempted to just have the action for a build if I don't like it, but I'm still undecided. I've always heard friends brag about their 22-250's, but I never really saw the point. Seemed like they were constantly wearing out barrels on them and the only advantage they could tell me about was the high velocity. It also seemed like I could get an even higher velocity shooting light weight bullets in a 243, so I just didn't see a point to it. Now that I have the chance to get one, I'm wondering if there is a point to it? Is there a reason I should have one? What's the average barrel life on these?
     
  2. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,211
    Location:
    Georgia
    If you can afford to buy the ammo to wear out a barrel you can afford another barrel. I don't want or need one. A 223 isn't as fast, but is more versatile for my needs. But if you want to shoot lighter bullets fast it will do it. Most 22-250 barrels aren't twisted for heavier bullets the 223 will handle. Depends on what you need and want it to do.
     
  3. R.W.Dale

    R.W.Dale Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    11,379
    Location:
    Northwest Arkansas
    To own a 22/250 it to experience the lure of the cartridge paper ballistics don't imply.

    I don't think I've ever been able to create or conjure up a combination of loads or rifle parts that resulted in a "bad" 22/250 group.

    For me it's just one of those cartridges that seems prone to shooting great groups if left to its own devices. Similar case but a polar opposite to my 243 experienced which always seemed to be highly picky as to what shot decent and what produced patterns with just a minor change
     
  4. dvdcrr

    dvdcrr member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,285
    I can see no real benefit in the field to choosing 22-250 over a 223, in fact 223 anchors coyotes better. Though it is nearly dead we really like 6mm Rem.

    You could do a custom build with fast twist barrel to shoot the heavier bullets out of your 22-250.
     
  5. Liberty1776

    Liberty1776 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,306
    Location:
    Minnesota
    ???. Why, and how come...?
     
  6. HOOfan_1

    HOOfan_1 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,698
    Location:
    Virginia
    Wearing out their barrels how? For light weight bullets .223 , isn't going to kill better...and coyotes don't need heavy bullets to be killed. .243 isn't a legal hunting cartridge wear I hunt groundhogs. .22-250 is..and it is a death laser.

    With lighter bullets at 300+ yards I'll take the .22-250 any time. That extra spped ensures those varmint bullets explode whenever they hit something.
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2014
  7. Jackal

    Jackal Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    4,511
    Location:
    Northwest Washington
    22-250 is the most versatile .22 centerfire round made, IF you reload. Reloaded, it can mimic everything from the .22 hornet to "near" 220 swift levels. However, if factory ammo is your flavor of choice, the old .223 cant be beaten.
     
  8. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,799
    Location:
    Texas
    Only one.

    Just cause! I really love my Remington VLS in 22-250.
     
  9. TexasPatriot.308

    TexasPatriot.308 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,328
    Location:
    Luling Texas
    I love .22-250s for everthing from coyotes to hogs to deer, got a few,....my favorite Ruger #1Varminter with bull barrel and a real nice Leupold....No.1 are called inaccurate....mine can put it thru a hogs ear at 200 yards or more, coytes, dear, DRT. beautiful tack driver, no matter what people say about No. 1 accuracy.
     
  10. witchhunter

    witchhunter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,851
    Location:
    Lassen County, California
    Out here in the west, the 22/250 is the benchmark standard for coyote rifles. Shoots flat, hits hard, don't kick. We get some 4-500 yard shots across a hayfield sometimes and that makes the difference right there. The right load will not shoot through one, but it will stop him. Not trying to argue with the .223 guys, just my opinion.
     
  11. Deog

    Deog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2013
    Messages:
    303
    Location:
    Signal Hill, California
    Have never shot a 22-250 that was not a tack driver.
     
  12. tdoyka

    tdoyka Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    109
    Location:
    windber, pa

    i can believe that!!!

    my tc encore in 20 vartarg with a 16 1/4" mgm heavy barrel can do .2" at 100yards(3 shots). my savage m12 in 223 does .4" at 100yds(5 shots) with 55gr varmint nightmare. i still have to find a scope, but it is a tc encore 27" mgm heavy barrel in 22-250 ackley improved with 1 in 8" twist. a 75 gr amax or 60gr vmax is going to be used, i think ;)
    groundhogs beware!!!! maybe i'll use it for deer next year!!!!
     
  13. Fredo0621

    Fredo0621 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2010
    Messages:
    51
    Location:
    NOLA
    This is why you should not trust everything you see on the internet.....There is no way that a .223 would kill something better than a .22-250 when it has a 300+ fps edge using the same components.
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2014
  14. Davek1977

    Davek1977 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,499
    I too call the idea of the .223 killing coyotes "deader" than a 22-250 nonsense. There is no way that given the same bullet out of a similar rifle, that the .223 would kill "better" than the 22-250 which beats it on both velocity and ft lbs of energy. Now, if you made the claim that a 223 shooting 69 gr bullets kills coyotes better than a 40 grain pill out of a 22-250, then we can at least have a conversation. But, everything else being equal, there's no way the ballistically inferior round is actually superior at killing coyotes for some undefined, unknown reason.
     
  15. JDGray

    JDGray Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,131
    Location:
    SW MI.
    Never lost an animal with a 22-250, cant say the same with a 223...
     
  16. splithoof

    splithoof Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,053
    Go ahead and buy it. For a project rifle, you can always go to another caliber that uses the same parent cartridge with minimal or no work to the bolt-face, ramp, magazine, etc.
    My daughter was given a nice Remington 788 in .22-250. After the original barrel was toast after several thousand rounds, we installed a short .308 barrel on it. It makes a very handy, light weight deer rifle that is very accurate. I would imaging the same could be done with the Savage.
     
  17. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,459
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    Ballistic coefficient; a 55 gr .224" bullet will have superior down range velocity retention to a 55 gr .244" bullet.
     
  18. 1948CJ2A

    1948CJ2A Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2011
    Messages:
    330
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    Man if some of you guys are saying a 22-250 is a barrel burner, I'd hate to hear your gripes on the old 220 Swift.
     
  19. Float Pilot

    Float Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,154
    Location:
    Kachemak Bay Alaska
    I have owned, hand-loaded and hunted with both the 220 Swift and the 22-250. The 22-250s did not burn out the barrels and they were super accurate. The 220 Swift only had a slight speed advantage at the cost of accuracy and short barrel life.
    I would still own a 22-250 if I were still hunting wolves and coyotes.
    It does at 450 yards what a 223 does at 200 yards.
     
  20. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,459
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    Sounds like a crappy barrel problem to me.

    The beauty of the .220 Swift is that you can match the top velocities of the .22-250 with a rather sedate load that is easy on brass and barrels. I run 55 grainers at 3,800 FPS. Yeah, a .22-250 can almost do that, but it's a max load. For the .220, though, it's very gentle.
     
  21. cdb1

    cdb1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,082
    Location:
    Justin, TX
    I don't think it matters whether you use a .243 or a 22-250 for most hunting purposes. I prefer the .243 but cannot tell you why.
     
  22. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    When Remington introduced the M788 in 22-250, they sold like hotcakes at around $100, and I did some load development for relatives and friends, and the M788 could shoot the lights out with about any load tried. I later had a Remington 40 XB in 22-250 for a time that was amazingly accurate, and was what you expect from a match rifle.
    My current 22-250 is a rifle that I built myself using a medium 24" Remington 700 barrel that I threaded to fit a pristine Turk Mauser K.Kale action that I finished and fit in a Hogue overmolded stock, and that one shoots under 1/2" for 5 shots all day with the 52gr A-Max.
    The beauty of the 22-250 is the ability to ballistically extend your kill range over the 222-223 cartridges by more than 100yds. It will reach out there.


    NCsmitty
     
  23. itsa pain

    itsa pain member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    With 80 grain bullets the 223 is superior at long range then a 22-250 with lighter bullet. I have a 22-250 with an 1x8 twist barrel and I can push the 80 grain A- Max 3250fps very flat
     
  24. Plastikosmd

    Plastikosmd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    668
    One of my favorites

    Barrel burner? Meh, about the only gun that I have not seen rebarreled is a BB gun. Bunch of heat, pressure, etc, a barrel will wear. I have seen someone cook a 223, then someone else a swift in one range session.
    ( swift broke my heart as I just missed buying it, 60's gun that was a beauty until someone treated it like an AR)
    One of mine?
    1960's gun, round count??? I have 1000+ though it and it was no safe queen based on loads and data that came with it.
    16780f6396d4157dffe29a3d07a97285_zpsabc14a0d.jpg

    Not hard to put 5 nearly into same hole at 100, frankly it gets boring, best was 0.086", not sure where that pic is.
    583ede301c796097466617272376c41e_zpseb328d49.png

    Boring to the point I mainly use it to test new shooting equipt etc. ie like this particular shooting rest

    fcxtest.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2014
  25. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    That's a sweet rifle, and with a Unertl too.


    NCsmitty
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page