Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Is this possible? Or even legal?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by zero_chances, May 6, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zero_chances

    zero_chances Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Acworth, Georgia
    I have been thinking about this for a while now.

    Would adapting the trigger group from an electric paintball marker to a firearm receiver be legal? I have never seen a firearm with an electronic trigger. A high rate of fire would be obtainable but it would still be semi-automatic because you would be pulling the trigger each and every time. Also, this could work well for target shooting because of the very light trigger pull. The mechanics of an electric paintball marker and a firearm are about the same. But instead of using a spring to drive the hammer, these use an air valve and piston. Maybe, just maybe, an electro-magnet could be substituted for the air piston and valve if it was strong enough to set off the softer primers.

    [​IMG]

    website further explaining paintball markers

    http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/212_fall2003.web.dir/Ian_Dixon/electric.htm
     
  2. Special_K

    Special_K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    I have always wanted to take a 10/22 and do this to it!!
    The problem being is that there are modes that allow three round burst and fully auto. Even ramping in some of the boards.

    The best way to do it would to get a 4 way valve, a 3.5 oz Co2 bottle, and a clippard ram. Hose it all together, adjust the trigger and go to town!

    If it is thought to be legal I might try this one this summer and have a pneumatic trigger on a ruger.
     
  3. zero_chances

    zero_chances Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Acworth, Georgia
    I am glad i am not the only one who has thought about this. The ramping/bursts is the only reason why i would presume this to be even considered to be illegal. But if you used an older or cheap gun that doesnt have ramping or burst modes, then all should be good to go. And the things are durable as anything. I have seen them thrown, sumbersed in water, shot with paintballs, and they still work fine.
     
  4. Shadow Shock

    Shadow Shock Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Austin, Tx.
    I have a paintball team and to "walk the trigger" as they say to achieve speeds of up to 40 rounds per second (in a $1500 gun) requires you to remove your hand from the grip and hold the gun with your nonfiring hand. this is not condictive to accuracy, not to mention not very controllable in a real gun (especially like a .308 or bigger). I'm more of a sniper ant take single shots, but even I can get almost 30 rounds per second on a decent gun. What's the point of emptying your whole magazine in under 1 second? and true, you can tune the trigger to make it riddicuously light, but it often causes accidental discharges because you can literally blow hard on the trigger and it will fire. Not to mention, a gunsmith would have to be pretty skilled to make a working gun with an electronic paintball gun trigger
     
  5. Ned Flangers

    Ned Flangers Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    69
    I have thought about this too!
    I pondered the double trigger mechanism in a purely mechanical sense thogh.
    But, after reading your post, why not tap off the gas from the fired round into a reservoir to supply the pnuematic action to the trigger?!!!!
     
  6. The Unknown User

    The Unknown User Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    712
    For the sake of allowing paintball to grow as a competitive sport and not give politicians more ammunition to use against it, I'd say not to try it.
     
  7. SDC

    SDC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,116
    Location:
    People's Republic of Canada
    Since ATF ruled the Akins Accelerator to be a full-auto, I'm sure this would fall into the same category.
     
  8. zero_chances

    zero_chances Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Acworth, Georgia
    I am familliar with walking the trigger and the rate of fire that can be reached. I had a friend who could get his Angel Speed over 40 bps fairly easily. But you did make a good point with the accidental discharges. But why would I want this? Same reason any civilian would legally by a MG or SBS.
     
  9. Special_K

    Special_K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    From my understanding the atkins accelerator used the recoil of the firearm to push the receiver back into the stock and then when it came forward again this would cause the trigger to strike the finger again starting the cycle.

    The idea is to take regulated air and push a ram back and forth to push on the sear.

    The idea of using a ram to trip a sear isn't exactly a paintball thing either. In fact there are very few true pneumatic triggers out there. Lots of electronic triggers but few pneumatic ones.

    That being said, if you have a 1 mm pull that is practically nothing I'm sure you could fire a firearm at a rate of at least 8-10 rounds per second and still be semi-auto.


    Personally, I like the idea because I have most of the parts and its a cheaper route than getting an aftermarket trigger for something like the ruger.

    edit: In this position I Think we should be talking about pneumatic triggers and not electronic ones. The pneumatic ones are not as picky and do not require batteries.
     
  10. zero_chances

    zero_chances Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Acworth, Georgia
    But with the AA, you pull the trigger once, and your finger stays stationary as the gun moves and fires again. Thats the difference here, your finger would be moving to pull the trigger each and every time.



    I have also wondered why there are no double triggered firearms. I find them quite comfortable.
     
  11. Special_K

    Special_K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    A double trigger isn't a good thing for accuracy. If your moving your fingers back and forth like that it would be wildly inaccurate. (Well, at least as firearms go.)
     
  12. The Deer Hunter

    The Deer Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,801
    Location:
    Chairborne HQ, MA :(
    Remington made a target rifle with an electronic ignition. I think you can find it in the special runs section.

    I guess it never really took off.
     
  13. zero_chances

    zero_chances Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Acworth, Georgia
    Are you talking about this?

    http://www.remington.com/products/firearms/special_runs/past_special_runs/model_700_etronX.asp

    Model 700 EtronX
    It says that it used ammunition that has an electrically responsive primer. So maybe that ammo is hard to find or expensive. Or it was the 2,000 dollar price tag of the rifle. Seems like it had some good features though.
     
  14. heron

    heron Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    I thought I read someplace of target rifles with electric triggers . . . long time back.

    Ooops, never mind.
     
  15. The Deer Hunter

    The Deer Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,801
    Location:
    Chairborne HQ, MA :(
    \

    Yes thats it.
     
  16. CypherNinja

    CypherNinja Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    811
    Location:
    Willoughby, Ohio
    Electronic triggers are a no-no according to the BATFE.

    Too easy to convert to full-auto.

    There are probably allowances made for honest-to-God single shots, I seem to remember Hammerli 160 and 162's having electronic triggers.
     
  17. The Deer Hunter

    The Deer Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    2,801
    Location:
    Chairborne HQ, MA :(
    we used to be able to delete our own posts...
     
  18. HeXeD775

    HeXeD775 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    South Central PA
    electroniclly fired projectiles

    Check this out, it was highlighted on "FutureWeapons". It's called Metal Storm...stacked ammunition, fired electronically. no moving parts, if you go to the link below it will take you to their web sites with video. They literally stack multiple projectiles on top of another in each tube. The electric charge fires the entire stack & multiple rounds toward the target.

    http://www.metalstorm.com/

    I think that the electro paintball trigger thing has been in alot of out thoughts but i have to say the more you pull the trigger the less accurate. It would alost have to be designed just to keep heads down, your full autos already do that. as far as an electro fired competition rifle it would really cut down on motion of the trigger pull itself.
     
  19. CNYCacher

    CNYCacher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    1,043
    Location:
    Auburn, NY
    You paintball guys need to get off the idea of incorporating pneumatics into the design. Go purely electrical with a low-draw solenoid to operate the sear and you are good to go.

    Can't wait for ATF to declare the 555 chip a machine gun :)

    Not quite. The electrical charge fires the top round in the stack. The expanding gases from that charge compress the charge below it, which causes it to make contact with the electric rails in the tube, and gets it ready for the next electric pulse. Rapid fire is by a series of pulses into the tube. Rediculous rates of fire achieved by strapping a bunch of tubes together on one firing computer. I think they can go above 1,000,000 rounds per minute (for a very short time).
     
  20. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,993
    Yes, but have they ever explained how to reload it?
    Most likely just replace with a pre-loaded barrel bundle, it is just the taxpayer's money.
     
  21. Special_K

    Special_K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    I can't imagine something like metal storm can be that accurate.
    With rounds stacked like they are the first round has a considerably shorter barrel than the last. differing velocities sending rounds everywhere downrange!


    As far as going purely electronic? I think that Co2 is cheaper than batteries and also more reliable! You have never had to deal with a P.O.S. electronic frame on the fritz. The worst thing that can happen with a pneumatic system is that the most that can go wrong is an O-ring or a Hose which is not likely!

    The 3.5 ounce tank can fit in the buttstock (It would stick out slightly on both sides) but I don't foresee any problems with it!
     
  22. HiroProX

    HiroProX Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2006
    Messages:
    546
    Actually going purely electric isn't that far out of the question.

    See also Remington's EtronX rifles.
     
  23. Special_K

    Special_K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    147
    No, it isn't. But if you want to pay for special primers and an expensive ignition system be my guest.
     
  24. 230RN
    • Contributing Member

    230RN Marines raising the left-leaning Pisa tower.

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    6,632
    Location:
    Calirado
    Last edited: May 7, 2007
  25. MattC

    MattC Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    162
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Please listen to Rob's concern over legal attention. I had a hell of a time being able to advertise for the paintball club on campus for awhile until I convinced them that paintball markers really aren't firearms, and so did not fall under the ban on depicting firearms in any postings on campus.

    But, as pointed out above, yes it's possible. No it's not advisable. If you put any electronic paintball grip on it, no matter what chip you use or how successfully it works, paintball markers will become highly restricted within a year as the Brady Bunch et al. perverts the issue and begins screaming that children can make fully auto machine guns. "Think of the children and enact common sense, reasonable laws!"

    p.s.--40 bps unassisted is utter BS. Human fingers, no matter how great a drummer your friend might have been or whatever else he did to "work up" his fingers, cannot move that quickly. Trigger bounce on the Angel was more likely the case.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page