It's now illegal to post on the Internet anonymously
- Thread starter taliv
- Start date
- Status
Kodiaz
member
Hmm is it almost time to start up the well regulated militia being necessary for the security of a free state thing because I'm not feeling very free right now.
I wonder what the liberals will say about the 1st amendment getting the kind of beating the 2nd usually gets.
Thomas Jefferson your country needs you.
I wonder what the liberals will say about the 1st amendment getting the kind of beating the 2nd usually gets.
Thomas Jefferson your country needs you.
TexasRifleman
Moderator Emeritus
Oh man I'm in trouble... I usually annoy MYSELF! Should I report myself to.....myself?
progunner1957
member
Felony annoyment?
As Edward Abbey once said, "The more corrupt the government, the more numerous its laws."
Great. Just great. Now wer'e all criminals - just what "The Government" wants.
As Edward Abbey once said, "The more corrupt the government, the more numerous its laws."
Flyboy
Member
"Not more than two years." Gee, that sounds an awful lot like a crime punishable by more than one year in prison.
Looks like THR is going to fall apart, now that all the gunnies are going to be gun-less.
Looks like THR is going to fall apart, now that all the gunnies are going to be gun-less.
Turkey Creek
Member
Just when I thought that the Feds couldn't get any more annoying than they already are they surprise me- Is there no end to their lunacy?- Will my grandchildren be able to interact in any way with anyone else without fear of some kind of prosecution?- Methinks it's time to start over again :banghead:
odysseus
Member
This is so dumb, I can barely keep still reading it. Thank's again neo-cons.
What are they thinking? We already have slander, harassment, libel, stalking, and etc. laws addressing true problems. This is patently dumb. It's the government's way of saying it doesn't like how free, free-speech on the Internet is.
Let me ask anyone out there: Doesn't the 1st Amendment protect this kind of speech? I know all speech is not protected, but I am sure speech doesn't have to be authenticated, and impeading speech for this abridges free speech?
On another note: I find commercials on paid cable annoying. Can I get remediation for this annoyance?
What are they thinking? We already have slander, harassment, libel, stalking, and etc. laws addressing true problems. This is patently dumb. It's the government's way of saying it doesn't like how free, free-speech on the Internet is.
Let me ask anyone out there: Doesn't the 1st Amendment protect this kind of speech? I know all speech is not protected, but I am sure speech doesn't have to be authenticated, and impeading speech for this abridges free speech?
On another note: I find commercials on paid cable annoying. Can I get remediation for this annoyance?
just another way to stifle free speech. Now, I personally hold that I won't say anything behinda person's back I wouldn't say to his or her face. So this won't bother me in the least.
You know, I wonder what John Payne, and Ben Franklin would say. They both used pen names to write things that annoyed people. I wonder how the .gov could forget that.
You know, I wonder what John Payne, and Ben Franklin would say. They both used pen names to write things that annoyed people. I wonder how the .gov could forget that.
longeyes
member
My name is...Gladiator.
Wiley
Member
Anyone else pick this up?
Thanks, Arlen. How's the chemo?
lycanthrope
Member
I'm Spartacus!
Flyboy
Member
You jest, but the cynic in me suggests that .gov didn't forget anything.
Brad Johnson
Member
If I annoy myself, who do I call to report it?
Brad
Brad
longeyes
member
No, I'M Spartacus!
Ezekiel
Member
So the next time someone sends me an annoying message from a Hotmail account -- using a name that is not their own -- I can report it to the police to both "discover" who they are [/i]and[/i] prosecute them?
cosine
Member
I'm Spartacus. *drinks Pepsi*
Sorry, just had to do it.
Now, seriously, this is just plain dumb. I am aften annoyed by what I see posted on the Internet, but to make it a crime to annoy someone? Jeez! Man, this is so stupid I can't even rationally counter or say something contructive about such actions.
Sorry, just had to do it.
Now, seriously, this is just plain dumb. I am aften annoyed by what I see posted on the Internet, but to make it a crime to annoy someone? Jeez!
Man, this is so stupid I can't even rationally counter or say something contructive about such actions. That must be a pseudonym.
Kodiaz
member
It isn't stupid it's a total violation of our 1st amendment rights. This is supposed to happen in Cuba or China not the USA.
FPrice
Member
I'm Spartacus.
Or am I FPrice?
Damn, don't you just hate when that happens.
Or am I FPrice?
Damn, don't you just hate when that happens.
cosine
Member
Kodiaz said:
That's why it is so stupid. Nobody on Capitol Hill realizes such or wants to make a stink about that? I wish personal projects, wants, or agendas couldn't be attached to these so-called "must pass" bills. They should be made to introduce a totally new bill for this kind of stupid stuff, so that a ruckus could be made about it.
Okay, I'll stop posting now. I'm still worked up.
geekWithA.45
Moderator Emeritus
No way, dudes. I am like, SO TOTALLY Spartacus.
- Status