SnWnMe
Member
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good sub atomic weasel launcher at your side, kid"
John Moses Browning entry on Wikipedia... sub atomic weasel launcher?!!
- Thread starter torpid
- Start date
- Status
Hemicuda
member
I prefer my SAWL to have the compensated barrel AND the multi-shot capability of the STANDARD capacity 1000 atomic weasels...
but there is some validity in the compact version with the shortened gripframe and the mid-length barrel...
all in all, I'd say get BOTH, you won't be sorry!
but there is some validity in the compact version with the shortened gripframe and the mid-length barrel...
all in all, I'd say get BOTH, you won't be sorry!
Mannlicher
Member
anyone that reads wiki for anything other than entertainment, is probably unable to tell fact from fiction anyway. I get such a chuckle out of internet forum posts, that give attribution to Wikipedia as an authoritative source.
Eleven Mike
Member
Look at Wikipedia as the general concensus on various topics. It's good for getting an overview of a subject one doesn't know much about. While it's open to question, there's no reason it can't be used as a source for an internet discussion. This ain't no refereed academic journal. On the other hand, one should be careful with the more controversial or subjective topics.
If I want to know some basic facts about Joan of Arc, or the Triangle Shirtwaist fire or the Federal Reserve system, Wikipedia is a good start if one doesn't have an encyclopedia handy. Of course, one wouldn't trust one's life or reputation on Wiki, either. I think that's why you see it cited so often. Because people are being cautious and saying, "According to Wiki..." If they fully trusted it, they'd just state the facts as if they were unimpeachable.
If I want to know some basic facts about Joan of Arc, or the Triangle Shirtwaist fire or the Federal Reserve system, Wikipedia is a good start if one doesn't have an encyclopedia handy. Of course, one wouldn't trust one's life or reputation on Wiki, either. I think that's why you see it cited so often. Because people are being cautious and saying, "According to Wiki..." If they fully trusted it, they'd just state the facts as if they were unimpeachable.
Axman
Member
Hey, if you've never taken an SAWL or SAOL to the range you're missing out on some big-time rodent blasting fun!!!
El Tejon
Member
I took my atomic weasel launcher to the range and everyone was looking at me when I was shooting it!
LOL, tH3 d34dly w34s3l, OMG, teenage gibberish. . . .
LOL, tH3 d34dly w34s3l, OMG, teenage gibberish. . . .
Carl N. Brown
Member
Which is more effective, the Browning subatomic weasel launcher
or the Beretta subatomic ferret launcher.
or the Beretta subatomic ferret launcher.
Glockfan.45
member
Hey not nice
and we all know that Gaston Glock perfected the design of the SAWL. Back when Glock first submitted his SAWL for test trials to the Austrian Army he was already in the business of manufacturing cages, water bottles, and exercise wheels for weasels.Sorry but that gave me a good laugh. Hey if we cant laugh at ourselves......
MatthewVanitas
Member
[rolls eyes]
Not this argument again! For cryin' out loud, use the THR search engine, this debate has been re-hashed ad-nauseum!
Mods: can we get a permanent ban on this topic before the BSAWL vs. BSAFL crowd drags this out for another 20 pages?
-MV
Axman
Member
Just wait until the BATFERL (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives and Rodent Launchers) gets wind of this. They just might put a severe restriction on suppressors to muffle the squeal of slinging rodents! Heck, they might even have to merge with the ASPCA.
Hemicuda
member
Has anyone heard if they have released the new improved double-barrel, semi automatic, self-loading dual-ammo, sub-atomic weasel/ferret launcher with the Swarovski crystal diamond/heart stght-bead system yet?
Axman
Member
I'm working on hollow point weasels right now. It's difficult to find good weasel molds to make the ammo but with enough tinkering I might have the patent on JHPW (jacketed hollow point weasels). Then the next item for invention is the 30 weasel magazine. Get your's before the BATFERL or Califonia and Massachusetts gets wind of these "assult rodent launchers (ARL-15)".
I just heard that PETA and the Brady bunch are working with Feinstein on a bill that would ban SAWLs and a number of other rodent launchers that have a magazine capacity of more than 10 animals, or a combination of several different cosmetic features.
In related news, Kennedy just introduced a bill that would prohibit the sale of "armor-piercing" mammals. This effectively bans any ammunition for SAWLs, SAFLs, and most rodent launchers. Basically, anything larger than hamsters would be off limits.
Time to start digging.
In related news, Kennedy just introduced a bill that would prohibit the sale of "armor-piercing" mammals. This effectively bans any ammunition for SAWLs, SAFLs, and most rodent launchers. Basically, anything larger than hamsters would be off limits.
Time to start digging.
SnWnMe
Member
Feinstein pulled a rodent out of Mayor Newsom and threw it in the bay as a symbolic gesture of ridding the city of illegal mammals.
walking arsenal
Member
What i want to know is what is the best powder for reloading a sub-atomic weasel round?
evan price
Member
The problem with SAWLs is that if not carefully loaded, the ammunition becomes bored and is inclined to motivate itself right up your arm, into your shirt.
To prevent this requires the use of a "Shoulder thing that goes up", which is EXACTLY what Carolyn McCarthy does not want you to have.
To prevent this requires the use of a "Shoulder thing that goes up", which is EXACTLY what Carolyn McCarthy does not want you to have.
revjen45
Member
Is it illegal if it launches more than one weasel per trigger pull? I thought weasel breeding developed politicians. Can we blame Rudy Giuliani on JMB?
- Status
