Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kahr .9mm vs Kahr .40mm

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by papadork, Oct 7, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. papadork

    papadork Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    I'm sticking with Kahr but I can't decide on the CM9 or the CM40. I heard that the CM40 doesn't have much muzzle flip like other 40's. Does anyone have an opinion on the CM40? They are both about the same size. I'm thinking what the heck, go for the bigger bang.
     
  2. BushyGuy

    BushyGuy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    634
    Location:
    at the end of the world..
    id go with the CM9 cheaper ammo and better follow up shots :eek:
     
  3. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,566
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    Buy the .40S&W first, and pick up the 9mm later -- it'll quickly pay for itself in practice ammo savings. Assuming a box a week, you are looking at about $7 a box savings cheapest 9mm vs cheapest .40S&W practice ammo, so you have paid for your CM9 is about 15 months.

    That's what I did.
     
  4. skt239

    skt239 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Messages:
    734
    I'd just get the .9mm then check out ammo offerings from makers like Underwood.
     
  5. usp9

    usp9 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2005
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Bowling Green, Va
    FWIW, I don't shoot much .40 and I find the Kahr .40 a bit of a handful. I am not able to shot the .40 quickly at all. Even the heavier all metal Kahrs have a fair amount of recoil compared to the 9mm. I'd suggest that if you're used to shooting .40, then you'll be fine, but if it's a new caliber to you, then the lightweight Kahr may not be a lot of fun.
     
  6. 9mmepiphany

    9mmepiphany Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    18,822
    Location:
    northern california
    Unless you are a regular user of the .40, I don't think a Kahr CM is a good first exposure.

    I'll say that thee Beretta 96 and the S&W M&P40 don't have much more muzzle flip than their 9mm counterparts, but I wouldn't say than about a Kahr
     
  7. silicosys4

    silicosys4 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,376
    I have a pm9, and a pm40. Shooting them back to back, I do notice the pm40's muzzle flip more, and would consider a pm9 a better choice for a gun someone isn't going to shoot a lot. the pm40's muzzle flip isn't extreme though, and the pm9 with hot ammo jumps almost as much.
     
  8. Bozwell

    Bozwell Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2011
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Personally, I'd go with the 9mm hands down. Cheaper ammo, faster follow-up shots and if 9mm won't stop the threat, you need a rifle, not a .40S&W.
     
  9. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    In that little gun, the .40 will hurt on both ends, and you will lose a round.
     
  10. Kahr33556

    Kahr33556 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2012
    Messages:
    210
    Location:
    USA
    get the 9 with some +p Sd loads.
    I have a CW9 looking at buying the CM 9 next.That or a G26.
     
  11. Hit_Factor

    Hit_Factor Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    315
    Location:
    St. Joseph, MI
    I think you heard wrong, the 40 is just plain snotty. Go with the nine.

    Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
     
  12. papadork

    papadork Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Messages:
    3
    Thanks to all for the comments.
     
  13. Esoxchaser

    Esoxchaser Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    360
    Location:
    Motown
    I had a PM40. It is not as snappy as some would have you believe. After all these years I should have known better, and I still just couldn't learn to love a poly gun, so I sold it and got a Sig P938. Roughly the same size & weight but sleeker, more concealable and an extra round. The kahr is a nice gun tho....
     
  14. Warp

    Warp Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    9,545
    Location:
    Georgia
    It's 9mm, not .9mm...and .40 caliber, not .40mm.
    More specifically the 9mm you are looking at would be called 9mm Luger, 9x19, 9mm NATO, 9mm Parabellum, or simply 9mm.

    The .40 is .40 Smith and Wesson (S&W)

    ;)


    I am not a fan of the .40 S&W, especially in overly small pistols.
     
  15. LightningMan

    LightningMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,029
    Lets not forget the PM40/CM40 (5+1) has one round less than the PM/CM9 (6+1). Personally I'd rather have the extra round over a little extra muzzle energy with some added recoil to boot. LM
     
  16. marine 97-03

    marine 97-03 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    884
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    40mm.....wow
     
  17. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,386
    , at least at short range;-)
     
  18. warhwkbb

    warhwkbb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2011
    Messages:
    201
    Location:
    Knoxville, TN
    I shoot plenty of magnums so I am no stranger to recoil. However, in a pistol as light as the PM/CM's, I think 40S&W is really pushing the limit. I find +P a handful in my PM9. One box of 50 and I'm done for the day. If I had the PM/CM40, I don't think I could make myself practice enough to be proficient with it. But that's with my skill-set not yours. YMMV
     
  19. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    14,188
    I had a CW40 and while I didn't feel that the recoil was that bad even with hotter loads, there was considerable muzzle flip and quick follow up shots were a bit more difficult.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page