Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kahr PM Series Recoil

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by jwalker497, Dec 23, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jwalker497

    jwalker497 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    203
    Is there anyone out there who owns or at least shot all three main calibers? The PM9 (9mm), the PM40 (40sw), and the PM 45 (45acp)?? If so, can you please compare the recoil form these gunss and advise whether or not one is to be avoided? The reason I ask is I got to shoot a PM45 with some hot Ammo and man did it kick!! Keep in mind, I like the 45 round and feel it's very controllable, but I was suprised to say the least. My worry is - I cant imagine how bad the PM40 would kick?? Anyone out there get an oppertunity to compare these, at least the 40 and 45?
     
  2. JasonblkZ06

    JasonblkZ06 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    42
    Location:
    Nevada, TX
    I have shot the PM9 and the PM40. Neither is bad, the PM 40 is harder for a doubletap follow up, but not too bad. Might take a little more practice, but I like the .40 for what it is.
     
  3. NWCP

    NWCP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    480
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    I went with a PM9. It has less recoil and is easier to bring back on target after each shot. The PM40 is a nice weapon, but does have a really snappy recoil. Follow up shots aren't as easy to make as with the 9. I haven't had the opportunity to shoot their PM45, but I would assume the recoil is once again less friendly than that of the PM9. All three are remarkable sub compact pistols and each that I've fired has a really smooth trigger. Folks may say what they will about Kahr pistols, but they are well made and their DAO trigger is touch to beat.
     
  4. txgolfer45

    txgolfer45 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Texas
    I've shot the PM9 and PM40. I own the PM9. IMHO, the PM40 recoil is bordering on violent. The PM9 with +P carry ammo is a handful but very manageable. Haven't tried the PM45. It wasn't available when I was shopping. Get the PM9.
     
  5. Guns and more

    Guns and more member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,929
    I call the PM-9 "snappy". It flips up, but is not unpleasant.
     
  6. M1911

    M1911 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,050
    I have a K9, K40, MK9, and PM9. The K9 is fine for an extended range session. The K40 is downright unpleasant for me -- I feel a significant impact in the web of my hand, between thumb and forefinger. The MK9 has more recoil than the K9, but is still less than the K40 and eminently doable. The PM9 is noticeably more recoil than the MK9. The PM9 is not something that you want to put 100 rounds through at a go, but I still find it easier than my S&W 642.

    There is simply no way in heck that I would try a Kahr MK40 or PM40. Get the PM9.
     
  7. coppermouse

    coppermouse Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    74
    I have the PM9 and it's not bad at all, as someone said kinda snappy. 300 rounds through it without a malfunction
     
  8. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,294
    That's a very good description. I installed Pearce grip extensions on my PM9 magazines which aided in recoil recovery kept my grip from shifting.
     
  9. JasonblkZ06

    JasonblkZ06 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    42
    Location:
    Nevada, TX
    The PM40 isn't bad. I like it.
     
  10. musicman

    musicman Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    31
    PM 45 is surprisingly mild with normal rounds, Plus P is a slightly differnt story but more than manageable...but what do you want for a tiny 45
     
  11. 9MMare

    9MMare Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Messages:
    1,085
    Location:
    Outside Seattle, WA
    Interesting! Isnt the MK9 the all steel pistol? I would think that would have less recoil. And what is the composition of the PM9? Thanks very much, this kind of info is helpful...when I've saved, I'd like to get a compact 9mm and I'm leaning towards Kahr. I want the 9mm with the least recoil (that was still a compact)....or at least manageable recoil...I am a person who practices tho, so may be able to compensate for some of it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page