Protected or not, there are plenty of local people will and do "take care of" wolves in their neighborhood.
Between license plate readers, the ballistic forensics the game departments are now using, that's not a good idea. I am "against" the wolves, but I sure would not risk my hunting license, thousands of dollars, and my clean record to shoot a wolf. (I had two come in to my predator call, when calling cougar one day) And, shooting a wolf here and there on occasion isn't going to make much of a difference.
Here is the bottom line. The vast vast vast huge areas of wilderness required to support a wolf population no longer exists. The gigantic herds of buffalo no longer exist. There is no way there is enough habitat for them to exist on our now over populated continent. It no longer exists. Poof. Gone. This is where the "we want the wolves" people are totally and completely ignorant and missing the point. Sincere ignorance. Conscientious stupidity. I repeat, the vast areas of wilderness, like in Northern Canada and Alaska, no longer exist in the lower U.S. We have some "large" areas, but to support wolves without wiping out the deer and elk
VAST areas are required. And, free roaming herds of buffalo help.
Although I'm against the wolves, I don't hate the wolves, and I think to "reintroduce" them, and then subject them to what would be required to control them, is pretty inhumane. Here in Northeast Washington state, they have gunned down whole packs that were preying on livestock, from helicopters, instead of opening up a hunting season on them. The wolf lovers are the wolves worst enemy. The issue will never be solved, and it will never end well.
"Let them be" "They gotta eat"?? That's like letting homeless strangers (the homeless reintroduction act?) enter your house at anytime, and eating your food. Or taking your stuff, because they have to eat, and they need your stuff.
