Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kel-Tec PF-9 vs. Kahr CW9 Comparison

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by wally, Nov 13, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,738
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    Recently picked up a Kel-Tec PF-9, guns that are small for their caliber are a large part of my collection so now that I've shot it a bit thought you might like some comparison photos and a few opinions.
    [​IMG]


    Executive sumary: Since you can usually find the CW9 or (even better CW40) for about $90-100 more than the PF-9, I'd go with the Kahr for the significantly better trigger, marginally better sights, and much better mag release button and slide lock lever.

    The PF-9 is a bit smaller and a bit thinner. In my hand the CW9 is much more pleasent to shoot -- slightly longer grip and ~1/4" smaller girth below the trigger guard makes a large difference for me. YMMV. I generally run 50 rounds a week thru my CW9 as an analog for the PM40 I usually carry and never have an issue with comfort. I had to take a rest after every two mags of the PF-9 and shoot something else for a while.

    Here is a photo of the gripsl L to R: CW9, PF-9, PM40, P3AT
    [​IMG]

    Here is a view form the front:
    [​IMG]

    Here is the top view of the slides, P3AT on top, CW9 on bottom.
    [​IMG]

    Finally a side view of the guns stacked on top of each other with the P3AT on top, CW9 on the bottom.
    [​IMG]


    My Kahr CW9 had to go back for warranty repair before compleating its first box of ammo, but its been fine since. So far, for the first 100 rounds the PF-9 has been 100% -- 50 rounds of my 147gr hard cast lead reloads that are the staple food of my CW9, 25 115gr Blazer Brass FMJ and some Federal 147gr Hydrashok and 147gr Winchester Ranger SXT JHP.

    I'd rate them a toss up accuracy wise, although the better trigger will make the Kahr seem more accurate for most folks. Probably my biggest complaints about the PF-9 are that you have to partially depress the mag catch to insert the mag. Iits a bear to push the button to release the mag (no chance of it happening by accident, a feature not a bug?) -- I have to shift my grip, speed reloads are going to be very difficult (but since I almost never carry a spare mag no real issue for me). And its hear impossible to release the slide with the hold open lever, slingshot is the way to go.

    If money was a serious issue, I'd be comfortable with the PF-9 as the PM40 will cost you what would buy a P3AT and PF-9, but if you can swing it, at only ~$100 more I think the CW9 (or CW40) is a better overall choice if the slightly larger size is not a showstopper for you as its much easier to shoot it well.

    --wally.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,738
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    PF-9 vs. J-frame

    Since its another carry option in this size range here are a few photos of the PF-9 next to my S&W SC-360 .357Mag. Price is about the same if you are willing to buy a Taurus J-frame revolver. The SC360 is my second most common carry behind my Kahr PM40.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    --wally.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. KONY

    KONY Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,161
    Location:
    Fairfax, Northern Virginia
    Great info! Thanks! :cool:
     
  4. scurtis_34471

    scurtis_34471 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Ocala, FL
    How shootable is the PM40? I'm seriously looking for a gun in this size class and am sort of debating between the PM9, CW9, MK9 and Walther PPS.
     
  5. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,738
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    I find the PM40 very shootable with 180gr Winchester SXT. Its a pussycat compared to the .357Mag SC360 with 158gr Hydrashoks :)

    But recoil is stout enough I got the CW9 for practice that was easier on my hand and wallet.

    --wally.
     
  6. scurtis_34471

    scurtis_34471 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Ocala, FL
    If I get a Kahr, it will be 9mm. I'm mostly just skittish because of all the bad feedback I've come across online. It seems similar to Kel Tec: some guns are flawless and some are complete disasters and there is no way to predict when you will get.
     
  7. Euclidean

    Euclidean Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    Messages:
    832
    Location:
    Texas
    Good thread. I personally chose the PF-9 over the Kahr CW series for the reasons you suggested, and I'm not really convinced the Kahr would have done anything for me personally the PF-9 doesn't. The ever so slightly larger size of the Kahr was a deal breaker too, believe it or not.

    The more expensive Kahrs are probably significantly better guns, but to me that's apples to oranges. When you compare the polymer Kahr to the PF-9 I don't see any significant difference for my intended purposes. Others may have different needs of course.

    They really do compare to each other very well, you could think of the Kel Tec as an inexpensive alternative. That's why I think this will be a big seller for them, no one else quite has something like this on the market at that price point.
     
  8. Bobo

    Bobo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Messages:
    906
    Location:
    Central, VA
    Great comparison and photos - thanks!!
     
  9. MrBill120

    MrBill120 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    206
    Location:
    The Cold North East
    I had a Kahr K-9, circa 1998. Loved it. Not a single FTF/FTE. ....but....I'm a G-26 man now. The G-26 carries on the ankle better for me....
    Does anyone know what there connection between Kahr and Sun Myung Moon is???
     
  10. markmc753

    markmc753 Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    158
    Buy a Kahr and you indirectly (though not very indirectly) fund a fairly well know cult -- "The Moonies"
     
  11. scurtis_34471

    scurtis_34471 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Ocala, FL
    The guy who owns Kahr Arms is the son of Sun Yun Moon, the founder of the Unification Church. He donates some of his personal wealth to his father's church, but the company is not owned by the Moonies. Why would I boycot a business just because of the owner's religion?

    That said, I do think Reverend Sun Yun Moon is probably the greatest con artist alive today and is a shining example for all who aspire to fleece the flock.
     
  12. BADUNAME2

    BADUNAME2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,262
    Location:
    Alger, OH
    What, if any, is the difference in percieved recoil between the Kahr, and the Kel-Tec? I've not yet found a PF-9 to shoot, but remember the P-11 as being obnoxious in that department. Recently rented a Kahr PM-9, and was expecting the same or worse, but it was remarkably shootable. Counter guy said a lot of people feel the same way. probably a difference in height of bore axis, or something. Sounded like a reasonable theory to me. So, is there a noticeable difference between the two, with the same ammo?

    ~~~Mat
     
  13. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,949
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    See... we need more of these types of posts.
    Those pics are very informative, almost like Bobo's chart.
    Thanks wally!!
     
  14. ArfinGreebly

    ArfinGreebly Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    11,691
    Location:
    North Idaho
    Short Grip

    It's worth noting that some of the pistols with a shorter grip will not engage all four fingers.

    Which, for many people is no big deal.

    For me, since my third finger doesn't grip real well (knuckle problem), I need to engage the fourth (little) finger.

    I can't do that on the PF-9 without a mag/grip extender.

    If your ability to shoot the gun effectively depends on having all your fingers engaged, keep that in mind as you survey your carry candidates.

    I actually went up a whole size class (to the Taurus PT911 in 9mm) to overcome this. I'm now looking for a compact single stack 9mm in approximately that profile.

    It would indeed be ironic if I had to go with a 1911 format to get a flat-enough gun with a long-enough grip.
     
  15. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,738
    Location:
    Houston, Tx

    I thought I'd expressed my opinion of it in the initial post:
    --wally.
     
  16. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    Great write up.

    I currently have a S&W 340PD and have considered picking up a PF-9, but having seen your comparison I think i'll stick with the 340PD.
     
  17. Corner Pocket

    Corner Pocket Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Messages:
    345
    Location:
    The land of the Alamo!
    Hats off to you, Wally, for some very helpful information. It's posts like yours that add much value to a group such as this.

    Happy shooting! :D

    Corner Pocket
     
  18. peyton

    peyton Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    658
    Thanks for the pictures!! I plan on renewing my CCW when I get out of the sandbox and the size comparisons help me determine what I am going to buy next.
     
  19. jwxspoon

    jwxspoon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2007
    Messages:
    451
    Location:
    Myrtle Beach, SC
    Great info!

    Lately I've found myself alternating carry between the PF9 and my CZ2075. The CZ weighs more but is still a comfortable IWB carry with the right holster.

    jw
     
  20. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    25,290
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    I've fired a 340 with magnums, talk about obnoxious! LOL I don't find my P11 that bad in recoil, routinely put 100 rounds a session out of it. I do have a Hogue sleeve and a mag extension for it, carry it without the mag extention in a pocket.

    What is Kahr customer service like? I've heard nothing, but kudos for KT.

    Wow, now there's something I haven't heard. Weird. I wouldn't NOT buy a Kahr because of that, but I don't consider the moonies a "religion", either. It's a quite scary cult IMHO.

    The stainless slide option for the Kahr (I'm assuming that is stainless) might be worth the extra 100 bucks IMHO, but size is critical in a pocket carry and I find my P11 on edge of being too large. It is quite light. Light is right for pocket carry. The PF9 is slightly thinner and lighter and that's a good thing.

    Great post, thanks! I don't think I'm in the market for either, my P11 serves me well, but I do wanna pick up a P3AT.
     
  21. romma

    romma Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,208
    Location:
    Southeastern,CT
    I have read lots of good feedback too! I have written a fair share of the feedback myself so I know!
     
  22. rjohnson4405

    rjohnson4405 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    262
    Location:
    Dayton, OH
    Very helpful post, again THANK YOU! (not yelling, think singing).

    I must go look at Kahr's site now, I really don't want to settle for 380 (9mm cheaper and better) so the Kahr's seem to be able still be pocket guns in 9mm and since I'm pretty tall (6'4" ish) my pockets tend to be pretty large and I'm thinking a Kahr would fit nicely...
     
  23. jfh

    jfh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    4,872
    Location:
    Maple Plain, MN
    Thanks for your pics, Wally. I'd missed this thread until now--but you've addressed the questions I have about my next carry-type gun purchase very nicely.

    I made an impulse buy earlier this fall of a P3AT--after checking out some of the pro / con threads about Kel-Tec. Although it isn't fully broken in yet, and I have had some FTFs, I'm awfully impressed with it as a BUG. I've had my eye on the Kahrs for years--but elected to get a j-frame when I started to carry this year.

    The one factor I'm looking at now is the trigger guard size / trigger access. Both the Kel-Tecs have smaller access, and I've noticed the difference in handling / shooting them.

    Do you see this as an issue? And, can you add any more about the PF-9? I really am tempted to go buy one, and probably would, save for the lack of reassurance about whether or not the teething issues for it are all sorted out.

    Jim H.
     
  24. poppy

    poppy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    This is one of the best posts I've seen on this forum. I had been considering the PF-9 because of cost and my experience with the P32, but now I'll probably stick with my Kahr's (P9 and K9). Thanks.
     
  25. buzz_knox

    buzz_knox Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,849
    How/why did you take the photo of the revolver while it was loaded?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page