Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kel tec PLR-16 vs. MPA MAC style 9mm/45acp

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by JBrady555, Jan 1, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JBrady555

    JBrady555 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Panama City, FL
    I need a gun to show my ass with, lol. I've narrowed it down to either a Kel tec plr16 or a MPA Mac style pistol. From what I hear both are reliable for what they are. Both have high mag capacities and from what I hear are fun range toys. I understand neither have a real practical use. So if you've owned or shot one or both of these, which would you choose?
     
  2. Buck Kramer

    Buck Kramer Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    683
    And what exactly is "show my ass?"
     
  3. tlatoani

    tlatoani Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    183
    lol. what?
     
  4. JBrady555

    JBrady555 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Panama City, FL
    Just a cool factor gun, thats all I meant. A conversation piece thats fun to shoot. I didn't mean anything bad by it.
     
  5. PoserHoser

    PoserHoser Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2011
    Messages:
    207
  6. JBrady555

    JBrady555 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Panama City, FL
    I'm kinda leaning towards the mpa too after watching a youtube video of a guy melting the bottom part of his forend off of a plr16 after running through 5 30rd mags. Not that I'd ever shoot that much at once but why would you build something like that.
     
  7. tlatoani

    tlatoani Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    183
    chrome AK from classicarms.
     
  8. WC145

    WC145 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,265
    Location:
    Maine
    I've had a PLR-16 for a few years. It's been reliable, fun, and very accurate.
     
  9. Apple a Day

    Apple a Day Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,055
    Location:
    Virginia
    You obviously need a Desert Eagle with a metallic-urine-colored tiger stripe finish. And a necklace to match. Don't forget to hold it sideways.
     
  10. JBrady555

    JBrady555 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Panama City, FL
    And I could get those new homeboy glock sights that mount on the side of your gun so that when you turn it sideways you can still aim it, lol.
     
  11. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,622
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    You understand wrong.

    The MAC style guns are PDW's, and in full auto with their high rates of fire, can be quite effective. Now, a semi-auto civilian version? Just an overweight handgun with crappy ergos.

    The PLR, however, is a very light-weight and highly accurate large handgun that fires a rifle cartridge. Definitely useful. With the shoulder sling, it is practically an SBR that falls under title I regs. I've owned two, sold one when money was tight. I'll never let the other one go, though.

    PLR gets my vote.
     
  12. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,737
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    The "cool" factor of the PLR-16 is greatly enhanced by its awesome muzzle blast and flash. Search for posts here on the PLR-16 and some impressive photos should show up.

    I've got both, the MPA 9mm is cheaper to shoot but I don't shoot either enough for it to matter.
     
  13. TexasGunNut

    TexasGunNut Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    PLR-16 gets my vote. Mine is a blast to shoot. Gets lots of looks and questions at the range. I am told they can keep a one inch group at 100 yards, with a good scope, not really sure about that, but 50 yards with EoTec is less than an inch if I do my part.
     
  14. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,807
    Location:
    Texas
    My choice was the PLR16; I bought mine when they first came out, neat littlte gun and since I have plenty of AR mags it was a plus.
    PLR-16complete.gif
     
  15. JBrady555

    JBrady555 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Panama City, FL
    well i now know what I have to do......I have to buy both guns. Darn it...
     
  16. svtruth

    svtruth Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,702
    Location:
    Bradford, VT
    Intelligent Design

    Often overlooked is the PLR's very clever take-down procedure, very well thought out. Also it is speced for the NATO 5.56, a little huskier than the .223.
    Good luck.
     
  17. TexasGunNut

    TexasGunNut Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    My only problem with the PLR design is cleaning. I find it hard to get a chamber brush in the chamber due to the angle the rod has to be at, other than that great little gun.
     
  18. EAJ

    EAJ Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    485
    Try using a Otis flex cable; works great! :)



    [​IMG]
     
  19. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    If you want an SBR, pay the $200 transfer tax and get an SBR. Then you'll have a gun that is both very cool and somewhat practical.
     
  20. EAJ

    EAJ Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    Messages:
    485
    That's why I actually sold my PLR16. Fun to shoot, but once the novelty wore off, I couldn't find a practical use for it. :)
     
  21. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,807
    Location:
    Texas
    Man I'm glad I don't have that problem! :D
     
  22. USMACHINEGUN.COM

    USMACHINEGUN.COM Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2009
    Messages:
    11
    Location:
    ARIZONA
    they are both completely different guns with different calibers. Neither has a real practical use, one shoots a rifle cal and the other a pistol round. Here is a link to a tricked out MPA 9mm since the previous photos are both Kel Tec-
    http://www.usmachinegun.com/proddetail.php?prod=MPAU-0137

    There are lots options for to add to any MPA gun but they are heavy, blocky type guns in the OEM configuration. The Kel Tec is mostly plastic and most parts are glued in place. I.E. barrel into the upper or barrel nut and the Kel Tec barrels are composed of the cheapest steel there is. We thread the longer version, (TEC SU 16A & SUB 2000 .223) and the shallow depth of the rifling shows the quality or lack of as well.
     
  23. JBrady555

    JBrady555 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Panama City, FL
    thanks for the info usmachinegun.com, I still want both guns but I'm going to get the MPA first and you can expect several accessory orders from me real soon.

    One more question, which MPA has more accessories available, the 9mm or the 45? Which has more accessability to replacement parts? Which is more durable/reliable? Thanks for any info.
     
  24. TexasGunNut

    TexasGunNut Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks for the tip! I am ordering one today. I didn't know those existed, learn something every day.
     
  25. InkEd

    InkEd Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,575
    Location:
    Parts Unknown
    Love my MPA 9mm! Stupid fun!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page