Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Lack of Public Forums at Anti Sites

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Cosmoline, Dec 31, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    I've been looking around various anti-gun sites, and one thing strikes me. Not one of them has anything like a public on-line forum for debate! This fact alone speaks volumes about their mentality and the weakness of their positions.
     
  2. Bahadur

    Bahadur Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    364
    Even According to the New York Times, we outnumber the antis by a wide margin on the Web. Something about the Internet attracting those with "independent" and "libertarian" streaks and all...
     
  3. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,524
    What do they need a public forum for? Sheeple follow, they don't lead. :D
     
  4. spacemanspiff

    spacemanspiff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,067
    Location:
    alaska
    for that matter, when was the last time an anti group held a 'debate'? havent they developed a pattern of popping up momentarily to spout off some 'facts' and 'statistics' and then quickly disappear before they are asked to quantify their statements with evidence?

    i like the how the phrase used in MOHAA sounds in german:
    Sie sind ein Bündel oder Feiglinge!
    actually though, that translates back to english as: "you are a bundle of cowards", so i guess a more grammatically correct sentence would read: "Sie sind feiglinge"; (they are cowards).
     
  5. Calamity Jane

    Calamity Jane Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    157
    Location:
    East TN
    I, too, have noticed the lack of public fora on anti-sites - here's one recent exception, however:

    http://www.michaelmoore.com/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=6

    It's Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine forum. But I warn you, take a preventative antacid before entering. :scrutiny:
     
  6. Capital Punishment

    Capital Punishment Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    144
    Location:
    Pasadena, Maryland
    I see dr. Jones has made his presence known in some threads. :)
     
  7. Boats

    Boats member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    3,705
    Location:
    Oregon
    I have more posts at mm.com in a month than I ever had on TFL in several or 1911forum. I guess I like playing offense better than defense.:evil:
     
  8. Mike Weber

    Mike Weber Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    96
    Location:
    Spokane . U.S.A.
    I've been playing around on the Michael moore site for a couple of weeks now. It seems to me that the bulk of the most rabid anti's have fled the Bowling for Columbine part of the site to other parts of the board. we seem to have them out numbered and out gunned:evil: with facts on the BFC forum. Its definately not the free fire zone that it was a couple of weeks ago. I found an interesting site that is what you might call an Anti Michael Moore site. http://www.moorewatch.com/ this one is worth taking a look at.
     
  9. hipower22

    hipower22 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Spencer Gulf littoral, S.A., Australia
    Why would they want a public forum? They are not interested in the truth, lies and fabrications are bread and butter to them. If they faced the truth it might cause them to think - and thinking ain't one of their strong points. :D
     
  10. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    The otherside's preferred method of debate is having a James Carville type spitting out 1000 words a minute loud enough to drown out all other speakers, who them jumps up at the end and claims victory because the otherside just didn't have a beleivable message.

    This is why TV/Radio and newsprint are their primary method of communications. They think limiting you to "Letters to the Editor" is enough counter response from the masses. The idea of a two-way communication scares the hell out of them.
     
  11. Blackhawk

    Blackhawk Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,882
    They don't want to hear much less be bothered by verifiable facts. Those pesky things to tend to show up on public forums.... :rolleyes:
     
  12. deej

    deej Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    (Occupied) California Republic
    Heaven forbid that anyone be permitted to eavesdrop on their disinformation and plotting.

    From http://www.millionmommarch.org/bbs/index.asp:

    DJ
     
  13. PATH

    PATH Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Location:
    Rockland, New York
    Yes there is nothing like open debate. MMM is anti free speech as well!
     
  14. pax

    pax Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,762
    Location:
    Washington state
    Their forum, their rules. That's not anti free speech. It's property rights.

    I think it's sad that so few of the antis have bulletin boards. While it is a reflection upon them, I think it is also a reflection on us, on the number of people on the RKBA side of things who, even though the facts are all on our side, still find it necessary or desirable to stoop to personal attacks, threats, and insults.

    Yeah, those folks aren't "us." But they represent us, and do it poorly.

    And I think everyone, antis and RKBAers alike, suffer for it.

    pax

    No matter what side of the argument you are on, you always find people on your side that you wish were on the other. -- Jascha Heifetz
     
  15. Nathaniel Firethorn

    Nathaniel Firethorn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,672
    Location:
    Exit 8A, Peoples' Republic of Corzinistan
    The reason that there aren't a lot of anti forums is that the topic would be so immensely, mind-bogglingly BORING.

    - pdmoderator
     
  16. Baba Louie

    Baba Louie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    3,831
    In the vein of "Know your enemy as you know yourself", what if (love those two words) 1800 members of TFL/THR, etc. were to actually join MMM as members and were to infiltrate and control those discussions, tending to agree at first... then discovering the error of their ways?

    I know, I know; "What If" Superman was a Nazi? (My standard line to a "What If" question posed to moi).

    The late Gunslinger of FFF and TFL fame (may he RIP) did just that with either the Ms. or NOW board (correct me if I'm wrong any FFF'ers). Cracked me up to hear him go on about getting in touch with his "feminine side" LOL.

    I'd probably have to assume a nom de plume like "Babette Louise" or some such and see if I CAN get in touch with my feminine side (are you in there honey?)

    Hmmm, Babette, mother of two, divorced, age 47 and I absolutely HATE Guns. (Actually, they scare me, the evil things!) What can I do to help your girls out here? You Go Girl! etc, etc, etc.

    It's funny to think about for a minute or two anyway. Gunslinger is laughing at me right now from his grave, I'm sure.

    Adios
     
  17. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    If it takes the To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar route to gain membership in the MMM, I'll let them keep their private forum. :)
     
  18. SIGarmed

    SIGarmed Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    619
    pax,

    I think the point is its very odd that they would have so many restrictions to post on a board, or not have any real discussion altogether. Why? To keep other idea's out even ones that are delivered in a civil manner. They are trying to push their agenda not do whats good for decent citizens. That speaks volumes.
    Who can be surprised though given who we're talking about?
     
  19. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    I've been limiting my use of the Moore site since the moderators starting shutting pro-gun thread down. Though some pro-gun types are rude, so are some antis. Can you imagine this site or TFL shutting down a thread because the antis were making too many points?? It's unthinkable. I love arguing with antis.

    One interesting thing about the Moore site--most of his fans are Europeans. I'm trying a "soft" approach with them now, but frankly some of the things I've heard from the Germans in particular make me think GW put the WRONG nations on the axis of evil list. North Koreans, crazy as they are, don't want to change my state's gun laws. Neither do the Iranians last time I checked. Europe may be the real enemy of the future.
     
  20. pax

    pax Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,762
    Location:
    Washington state
    SIGarmed,

    Yeah, I hear what you're saying.

    I think, too, that a lot of what drives the anti movement is plain old fear. These are fearful people we're talking about, people who want everything to be under control because they're afraid what will happen if it's not. This is true of the laws they want to pass, and I think in many (not all) cases, it's true in their personal lives as well. It's not so much that they want to run others' lives, but that they are fearful of what would happen if others ran their own lives (an important distinction).

    Anyway, if the driving force is fear, of course they are afraid of what would happen if their board were open to the public. They are afraid of being insulted, threatened, and personally attacked. And, quite frankly, I think past history gives them some reason to be fearful -- given that many of them define "attacked" as, "someone didn't affirm what I said and agree with me."

    pax

    Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
     
  21. Mike Irwin

    Mike Irwin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,956
    Location:
    Below the Manson-Nixon line in Virginia...
    And you're surprised how?

    They don't want debate.

    They want absolute, unconditional acceptance of their position.

    As far as they're concerned, they're right, so there's no room or need for discussion.
     
  22. Capital Punishment

    Capital Punishment Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    144
    Location:
    Pasadena, Maryland
  23. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Leftists are moral and intellectual cockroaches that can't stand the light of day.
     
  24. Black Dragon

    Black Dragon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Lost somewhere in Michigan
    Hey the truth hurts and the anti's want to "feel" good about themselves. Remember, "it's all for the children."
     
  25. braindead0

    braindead0 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,208
    Location:
    Canton, Ohio
    You can't even read the MMM board..much less post.. I've tried some social engineering to get on there (didn't really try much..just took a poke). No luck.

    Perhaps I'll ask my wife to try...write an e-mail to the regional coordinator and say "well, i'd join up but I would like to learn more about your position before doing so"..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page