BoltLover
Member
Yep that is definitely 49.9...i still use my lee every time I reload.
Well, regardless of where the zero in the window in the photo is.
(I already told you it was a camera parallax thing.)
If this old retired machinist can't read it reliably, without squinting and using a flashlight?
And figure it out with 100% certainty?
If I can't figure it out, there has to be a whole bunch of new reloaders out there who have never heard of or seen a vernier scale that can't get it right either!
That's all I was saying.
rc
I'm not, unfortunately, the only scales (non digital) I saw at my gun show were the Lee discussed here, the lesser Lyman ( 500 ) and the lesser RCBS 5-10, both of which I understand are plastic and leave something to be desired when compared to their respective "next step up" models. I only use the scale as a test for accuracy of my Lee Pro Powder Disc's drops. Unless something superior is suggested, I will get a RCBS 10-10 model....On a better note, I did get the last few tidbits to finish my AR 300 Blk Out!I didn't mean to trash the Lee scale this bad in the review.
If that's what you have and are happy with it, great.
But if you haven't used anything else, don't rule buying something else out!!
rc
There is nothing plastic about my 5-10.the lesser RCBS 5-10, both of which I understand are plastic
My bad the lesser RCBS is the 505There is nothing plastic about my 5-10.
It is a solid cast metal base with a solid metal beam.
The 10-10 is the same exact scale with a built-in dust cover.
and 1,010-grain capacity instead of 510 grains.
But they don't make the 5-10 anymore.
I don't know about the other new models they have now.
rc
My bad the lesser RCBS is the 505
http://ads.midwayusa.com/product/75...scale-511-grain-capacity?cm_vc=ProductFinding
It says its made of metal alloy, not plastic. Its quite a bit less expensive, I will have to investigate it and compare to:
http://ads.midwayusa.com/product/41...cale-1010-grain-capacity?cm_vc=ProductFinding
There is also a 502 model which is even less expensive.
I dont mind paying more and crying once if it is a superior unit. Looking at the reviews on Amazon, even the 10-10 goes from 1 star all the way to 5 stars...this is going to take a little while to decide!
Russellc
I even read the instructions. http://leeprecision.com/cgi-data/instruct/SA2056.pdf Now i am more confused. Maybe flip the coin? Thanks RC.So, it's either 50.0, or 50.85, or 50.9?
Yes, my mistake as well, I have never loaded into full double digits (xx.x) and didnt think about that. Im not sure if its 49.9 or 50.9, but I would say the .9 part is accurate.The 5.9 is just a stupid typo. My brain was seeing 5 not 50 since I load for pistols only. But it is a .9 on the end. The Lee weight uses the middle dash, 1 on the 0, 2 on the 9, 3 on the 8, the middle is 9. If the ball is in the 50 grain hole, it should be 50.9
Sorry RC .
Yes, my mistake as well, I have never loaded into full double digits (xx.x) and didnt think about that. Im not sure if its 49.9 or 50.9, but I would say the .9 part is accurate.
Thats all fine and dandy.Also remember its designed to be use the opposite
Thats all fine and dandy.
But who doesn't need to weight unknown weights on powder scales occasionally?
I weight everything from unknown bullet weight, to steel penetrator tips, to primers, to unknown powder charges.
So if there is any doubt reading it when weighing unknown weights?
What good would it be to me, or most any other reloader?
rc
So, what did the 50 grain bullet picture I posted weigh then?
50.0, or 50.85??
rc