Legal Strawman Purchase?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
108
Location
Minnesota, USA
I can legally buy a handgun in private trade and I can legally own a handgun.. I CANNOT legally buy one from FFL at my age. Taking into account those things, would this be an illegal "strawman purchase" if I were to have my cousin get a brand new handgun from FFL then I pay him the money?
 
Short answer, if the buyer is not the bona fide buyer, but is buying on behalf of another person, it is a straw purchase; if the buyer is buying for someone who cannot legally buy the gun it is doubly a straw purchase.

Long answer:
http://www.atf.gov/pub/fire-explo_pub/2005/p53004/index.htm

Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, ATF P 5300.4 -
Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005 (Revised - 9/05)] Page 165

15. STRAW PURCHASES

Questions have arisen concerning the lawfulness of firearms purchases from licensees by persons who use a "straw purchaser" (another person) to acquire the firearms. Specifically, the actual buyer uses the straw purchaser to execute the Form 4473 purporting to show that the straw purchaser is the actual purchaser of the firearm. In some instances, a straw purchaser is used because the actual purchaser is prohibited from acquiring the firearm. That is to say, the actual purchaser is a felon or is within one of the other prohibited categories of persons who may not lawfully acquire firearms or is a resident of a State other than that in which the licensee's business premises is located. Because of his or her disability, the person uses a straw purchaser who is not prohibited from purchasing a firearm from the licensee. In other instances, neither the straw purchaser nor the actual purchaser is prohibited from acquiring the firearm.

In both instances, the straw purchaser violates Federal law by making false statements on Form 4473 to the licensee with respect to the identity of the actual purchaser of the firearm, as well as the actual purchaser's residence address and date of birth. The actual purchaser who utilized the straw purchaser to acquire a firearm has unlawfully aided and abetted or caused the making of the false statements. The licensee selling the firearm under these circumstances also violates Federal law if the licensee is aware of the false statements on the form. It is immaterial that the actual purchaser and the straw purchaser are residents of the State in which the licensee's business premises is located, are not prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms, and could have lawfully purchased firearms from the licensee.

An example of an illegal straw purchase is as follows: Mr. Smith asks Mr. Jones to purchase a firearm for Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith gives Mr. Jones the money for the firearm. If Mr. Jones fills out Form 4473, he violates the law by falsely stating that he is the actual buyer of the firearm. Mr. Smith also violates the law because he has unlawfully aided and abetted or caused the making of false statements on the form.

Where a person purchases a firearm with the intent of making a gift of the firearm to another person, the person making the purchase is indeed the true purchaser. There is no straw purchaser in these instances. In the above example, if Mr. Jones had bought a firearm with his own money to give to Mr. Smith as a birthday present, Mr. Jones could lawfully have completed Form 4473. The use of gift certificates would also not fall within the category of straw purchases. The person redeeming the gift certificate would be the actual purchaser of the firearm and would be properly reflected as such in the dealer's records.

The exception is that a person buying a gun with their money as a bona fide gift to a person who can legally own a gun, the purchaser of the gift is considered the bona fide legal buyer.

However, "Hey cuz, take this money and go buy me gun" would be seen as a straw purchase even if you could legally own the gun.
 
Last edited:
That would be a Federal felony. That is pretty much the definition of a straw purchase under Federal law. Your cousin would be buying the gun for you, and you cannot legally buy it yourself, so it would violate Federal law.
 
I don't know Minnesota law but in the state of Michigan anyone getting a handgun from a dealer or private seller must get a purchase permit from local PD and then register the gun with local PD after purchase. Exception is CPL holders who can skip the permit but still have to register the gun.

Point being if a handgun gets transferred then the transaction must be approved by police, and if they approve the transaction then no it's not illegal.

EXAMPLE:
I am short on cash, so my buddy goes and buys a Pistol because it's on sale for a limited time. He gets a purchase permit... blah blah it's registered to him. If he wants to sell it to me even a day later then I also need a permit and need to register the gun in my name.
 
Hm, not the case where I live. If I am 18, I can legally purchase a handgun in private trade and nobody needs to know. I can also legally own it (of course).
 
It all basically centers around intent. If the buyer (your buddy) buys the gun from a dealer with the specific intent of providing that gun to you for compensation either for the gun itself or for the act of purchasing it, he is a straw purchaser and is violating the law.

If your buddy buys the gun with his own money with the intent of adding the gun to his personal belongings, then his purchase is legal - even if his intent is to give it as a gift to someone else, or with the idea that he is getting a really good deal and might be able to sell it at a personal profit later.
 
What about buying firearms to gift to girlfriends/wives? Still a straw purchase?

Read post #2 again. If you purchase a gun wih your own funds, intending to give the gun as a gift it is NOT a straw purchase. It can be given as a gift to anyone who is not a prohibited person. That is federal law, state laws can vary.
 
Im not going to be the guinea pig but I wonder how many judges would throw out a case involving a techinical straw purchase in which the said gun never once touched the hands of anyone who could not legally possess it.
 
There's actually no reason for anyone to know this is a straw purchase (which it is).
It is like a guy who goes to visit his buddy in a neighboring state. They go out and shoot and each one likes the gun the other has. SO they swap. Illegal? Yes. ANyone care? No.
 
There's actually no reason for anyone to know this is a straw purchase (which it is).
It is like a guy who goes to visit his buddy in a neighboring state. They go out and shoot and each one likes the gun the other has. SO they swap. Illegal? Yes. ANyone care? No.

My cousin is an LEO, he'll probably care.. Then again, besides being family he's one of my best friends, maybe he wouldn't care.

Im not going to be the guinea pig but I wonder how many judges would throw out a case involving a techinical straw purchase in which the said gun never once touched the hands of anyone who could not legally possess it.

Yeah, I can see that, then again I've never stood in front of a judge so I haven't a clue how it all would go down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top