Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Legal Term Sought

Discussion in 'Legal' started by AZ Jeff, Aug 3, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AZ Jeff

    AZ Jeff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    821
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    In the past couple of years, there have been threads here and TFL about when family doctors start counseling their patients on the "health risks" of owning firearms.

    Several times, there has been reference to the legal pitfalls a doctor might encounter by doing so. The term escapes me, but has something to do with "professional boundaries".

    Can anyone refresh my memory on what the legal term is for the risks of giving out advice in an professional area for which one is not trained?
     
  2. R.H. Lee

    R.H. Lee Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,377
    Location:
    CA
    'Boundary violation'?
     
  3. Rockstar

    Rockstar member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,353
    This is an easy one! It's "doctorus stupiditus"!!!!
     
  4. AZ Jeff

    AZ Jeff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    821
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    THANK YOU!!! That was the term I was seeking.
     
  5. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Potential malpractice. :uhoh:
     
  6. GhostRider66

    GhostRider66 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Messages:
    318
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    Not sure but the appropriate legal response is "****" I believe.
     
  7. another okie

    another okie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    "Boundary violation" is probably what you are looking for, but it is a very strong word. Do not use it to a doctor unless you are ready to find another doctor.
     
  8. Tory

    Tory member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    911
    Here's another one:

    "Officious intermeddler"

    NOT a class looked upon with favor by the law.
     
  9. CAnnoneer

    CAnnoneer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Location:
    Los Angeles County, CA
    To be fair, we need to make a distinction between purely medical concerns and political concerns.

    If a physician talks to the patient about how guns are evil and so dangerous that nobody should have one at home, that is clearly "boundary violation." :mad:

    If a physician talks about the risks of gradual lead poisoning by handling ammunition in an unsafe way, or about shooting in poorly ventilated ranges where exhaust gases containing sulphurous oxides, lead oxides, etc, tend to settle, then it is okay. Still, I think regular smoking and alcohol are probably at least a hundred times more damaging than a closed range a couple times a month. Along the same line of thought, physicians then should also discuss the dangers of living in smoggy environments, such as most metropolitan areas :evil:
     
  10. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    Not sure if it's strictly a legal term but I think what you have in mind is "area of professional expertise." That's what says that a mechanical engineer isn't supposed to put his seal and signature on complex electrical designs, for example, or that orthopeadic surgeons probably should not be undertaking heart transplants.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page