Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Legality of selling LEO weapons purchased with department letter in private sale

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Redlg155, Sep 18, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Redlg155

    Redlg155 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    NW Florida
    This question had me wondering a bit since I've been seeing a lot of formerly restricted LEO weapons purchased lately due to the demise of the ban.

    Here is the question..

    An officer purchases a pre ban (or any weapon for that matter) with a department letterhead. This gets the officer a weapon at a substantial discount since he doesn't have to pay FET. Will the future sale of this weapon be restricted to LEO-LEO transfers, or can he/she sell the weapon in a private sale or to a dealer at their discretion?

    I'm specifically questioning the avoidance of FET in the initial purchase and potential resale problems.

    Good Shooting
    Red
     
  2. WT

    WT Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,985
    So you are saying the LEO wants to become an off the books gun dealer as well as wanting to defraud the tax guys in the US government?
     
  3. Hkmp5sd

    Hkmp5sd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,513
    Location:
    Winter Haven, FL
    There is no longer any classification of LEO only weapons. If the LEO owns the weapon, he can sell it to anyone who can legally purchase a firearm. The fact that no tax was paid doesn't effect the sale. I bought all kinds ot things on base in the military without paying tax on them and then sold them whenever I no longer wanted them.
     
  4. gezzer

    gezzer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,052
    Location:
    NH
    When the gun is bought by the individual officer with a letter he pays the FET.

    Only if the Dept itself bought the rifle is there no FET.

    And now it makes no difference if the gun is marked or not the law is gone.
     
  5. Chris Rhines

    Chris Rhines Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,773
    Location:
    Potomac, Maryland - Behind enemy lines!!
    Jeez, when you put it that way, that does sound like a good idea... :D

    - Chris
     
  6. EricOKC

    EricOKC Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    88
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Sounds like a good idea to me! I think i'd want to get to know that guy :D
     
  7. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    I think as long as less than one gun per year sold as such, and as long as the officer had the gun for more than... maybe three months... I wouldn't have a problem with it.

    On the other hand, if the officer is supplimenting his income because of possession of letterhead, then I guess I'd have an issue with that.
     
  8. ScottsGT

    ScottsGT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,987
    Location:
    Columbia, SC
    Make sure it is not a class 3 weapon. I had a friend that got out of the police force and sold his 2 AR's. One was an 11" barrel that he sold not knowing it was a class 3. He bought it with a dept. letterhead and carried it on duty. He had NO ideas of firearms laws :rolleyes: And he was a cop.
    Well, did he ever get worried after he found this out......
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page