Desertdog
Member
Legislation For The 6,000,000+ Legally Armed Civilians Needs To Be Implemented Like The "Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act of 2004".
http://legallyarmed.com/national_law_enforcement_carry.htm
The "Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act" has become law. It is now known as Public Law 108-277. This law helps the U.S.A. be better protected from terrorists and terrorist sympathizers in America. This is beneficial for America since it is believed that terrorists are here in the U.S.A.. If this is the case, would America benefit even more if the law abiding legally armed civilian population were allowed access to every state in America?
The recent release of information by Attorney General Ashcroft regarding financial institutions and plans made by terrorists, shows that they have been in the U.S.A., and are probably still here. Their details regarding financial institutions shows that they were concerned about firearms since they pointed out to their associates the armed guards located within these financial institutions and buildings. What if they thought that most of the people working in these locations were armed. Would they consider their intended targets too dangerous because of such a large armed civilian population? Is this what our founding fathers thought about when they addressed firearms? Naturally they could not in vision in their day what is happening in today's world...or could they?
The British, The Islamic Terrorists, What Is The Difference?
During the time when our country was founded, acts of death and destructions due to the war with England were common place. The American Army of the time was comprised mostly of civilians who volunteered to help defend their homeland. The current war in Iraq has a lot of national guard and reserves fighting there. These are civilians who volunteer they time to help defend their homeland.
The only other time that the homeland of America has been threatened as much as it is today, was when our country was founded. The mode of defense for the armed population at that time was small arms. In the war in Iraq, most of the fighting is with small arms. Except for the technological advances in firearms, little has changed regarding war and defending America. Small arms are still the key ingredient when it comes down to close fighting including urban warfare. Why then do laws exist that restrict law enforcement officers and law abiding legally armed citizens, from carrying their firearms? These restrictive laws do not do anything to discourage individuals intent of committing acts of terror. They only make the odds of committing these acts of terror higher because; there is less resistance for them to overcome, or to cause harm to them before they can complete their act of terror.
Lets Make The Terrorists Job Harder To Fulfill!
We have been told that suicide bombers and the majority of terrorists, do not want to be harmed before they can carry out their acts of terror. We have been told that death is not something they fear or worry about. Well no matter what we have been told, death is a concern to every living thing. Animals and humans go out of their way to prevent harm or death to themselves. Terrorists are no different. They fear that they may not complete their act of terror before dying. They do not want to be killed or harmed before their act of terror is complete. Well, if this is their goal, lets throw a monkey wrench into their plans. Have the majority of law abiding citizens carry a handgun until every terrorist in America trying to kill Americans are DEAD before they can carry out their act of terror! No bullet is going to stop a chemical, biological, or nuclear attack but, it might stop the means of delivery before it can occur. The human delivery system...the terrorist. Some believe that small arms or bombs will be used in America as they are currently being used in other regions of the world. If this does occur, won't all Americans be better prepared by carrying small arms in the form of handguns?
We have been told that we need to change the way we are perceived by the rest of the world for us to win this war on terror. Well, let the rest of the world know that Americans will do whatever it takes to defend their way of life and their homeland. Let them perceive Americans as defiant to the will of individuals who want to kill us because of the way we live. America has always been known as the land of liberty. Lets give more liberty to our own people. Remove the restrictions on where law enforcement officers and legally armed civilians can carry their handguns. Increase access to every state in America for legally armed citizens just like the "Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act of 2004", and show the world that Americans are capable of defending their homeland not only with their military, but with the legally armed civilian population.
Let every Islamic Terrorist know that we will gladly assist them in achieving their main goal;.
to meet Allah!
Please e-mail comments on this article to:
[email protected]
http://legallyarmed.com/national_law_enforcement_carry.htm
The "Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act" has become law. It is now known as Public Law 108-277. This law helps the U.S.A. be better protected from terrorists and terrorist sympathizers in America. This is beneficial for America since it is believed that terrorists are here in the U.S.A.. If this is the case, would America benefit even more if the law abiding legally armed civilian population were allowed access to every state in America?
The recent release of information by Attorney General Ashcroft regarding financial institutions and plans made by terrorists, shows that they have been in the U.S.A., and are probably still here. Their details regarding financial institutions shows that they were concerned about firearms since they pointed out to their associates the armed guards located within these financial institutions and buildings. What if they thought that most of the people working in these locations were armed. Would they consider their intended targets too dangerous because of such a large armed civilian population? Is this what our founding fathers thought about when they addressed firearms? Naturally they could not in vision in their day what is happening in today's world...or could they?
The British, The Islamic Terrorists, What Is The Difference?
During the time when our country was founded, acts of death and destructions due to the war with England were common place. The American Army of the time was comprised mostly of civilians who volunteered to help defend their homeland. The current war in Iraq has a lot of national guard and reserves fighting there. These are civilians who volunteer they time to help defend their homeland.
The only other time that the homeland of America has been threatened as much as it is today, was when our country was founded. The mode of defense for the armed population at that time was small arms. In the war in Iraq, most of the fighting is with small arms. Except for the technological advances in firearms, little has changed regarding war and defending America. Small arms are still the key ingredient when it comes down to close fighting including urban warfare. Why then do laws exist that restrict law enforcement officers and law abiding legally armed citizens, from carrying their firearms? These restrictive laws do not do anything to discourage individuals intent of committing acts of terror. They only make the odds of committing these acts of terror higher because; there is less resistance for them to overcome, or to cause harm to them before they can complete their act of terror.
Lets Make The Terrorists Job Harder To Fulfill!
We have been told that suicide bombers and the majority of terrorists, do not want to be harmed before they can carry out their acts of terror. We have been told that death is not something they fear or worry about. Well no matter what we have been told, death is a concern to every living thing. Animals and humans go out of their way to prevent harm or death to themselves. Terrorists are no different. They fear that they may not complete their act of terror before dying. They do not want to be killed or harmed before their act of terror is complete. Well, if this is their goal, lets throw a monkey wrench into their plans. Have the majority of law abiding citizens carry a handgun until every terrorist in America trying to kill Americans are DEAD before they can carry out their act of terror! No bullet is going to stop a chemical, biological, or nuclear attack but, it might stop the means of delivery before it can occur. The human delivery system...the terrorist. Some believe that small arms or bombs will be used in America as they are currently being used in other regions of the world. If this does occur, won't all Americans be better prepared by carrying small arms in the form of handguns?
We have been told that we need to change the way we are perceived by the rest of the world for us to win this war on terror. Well, let the rest of the world know that Americans will do whatever it takes to defend their way of life and their homeland. Let them perceive Americans as defiant to the will of individuals who want to kill us because of the way we live. America has always been known as the land of liberty. Lets give more liberty to our own people. Remove the restrictions on where law enforcement officers and legally armed civilians can carry their handguns. Increase access to every state in America for legally armed citizens just like the "Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act of 2004", and show the world that Americans are capable of defending their homeland not only with their military, but with the legally armed civilian population.
Let every Islamic Terrorist know that we will gladly assist them in achieving their main goal;.
to meet Allah!
Please e-mail comments on this article to:
[email protected]
didn't even try. 
