As the author of post # 90 I really don't see what is moronic about it. It was an opinion just as yours is an opinion. I like Glocks and carry one every day and would never even consider any single action pistol for self defense such that requires 2 actions to make it fire.Glock reliability and durability rivals that of the most durable and dependable auto loader ever designed and made, the Russian Makarov PM. They share the same principles, less parts equals less problem and totally serviceable by the end user in the field with little required training. Plus universal parts replacement also like the Mak. To me, that is very intelligently thought design for a combat weapon. Like them or hate them they simply work and work well in a very high percentage of the time.
My personal observations is that they are excellent CCW with no protruding and sharp edges like a 1911 or a S&W revolver and I am sure that was not by accident either. I read somewhere that a 1911 is what you show your friends and a Glock is what you show you enemies.
Safeties can get you killed. With a revolver and a Glock there is only one action needed....pull the trigger. That is innovation that seemed to have escaped the John Moses Browning worshipers. But then again, that is my opinion. Que Sara Sear!