Quantcast

Let's see your blued S&W's!!

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Sneakshot92, May 28, 2020.

  1. MaxP

    MaxP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2015
    Messages:
    1,780
    Location:
    Virginia
    Buffalo Bore DG loads.
     
  2. Sneakshot92

    Sneakshot92 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    784
    Location:
    WI
    Ahh. Close. Should have known with you. :thumbup:
     
    MaxP likes this.
  3. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,794
    Location:
    Land of the Pilgrims
    Howdy Again

    I forgot these in the pre-1957 blued 38s:

    38/44 Heavy Duty. Shipped in 1931.

    pl5S1p5cj.jpg




    38/44 Outdoorsman. Shipped in 1933.

    pl6pBgcQj.jpg




    A couple more blued 38s that I forgot about:

    Flat Latch Model 36 Chiefs Special 38 Special. Shipped 1961.
    pmPlM8Wcj.jpg




    Model 36 that shipped in 1969.

    pnVnZOO3j.jpg




    Ooops, forgot another one.

    Model 14-3. Shipped 1974.

    poY3RfpOj.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jun 19, 2020
    Reinz, Kookla, NIGHTLORD40K and 6 others like this.
  4. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,794
    Location:
    Land of the Pilgrims
    OK, let's move on to the 357 Magnums:

    Model 19-3, bought it brand-spanky new in 1975 for $125. Still have the box and all the goodies.

    pmHwhPR1j.jpg




    Model 13-2 Shipped sometime around 1979.

    pnVnFaE9j.jpg




    Model 27. Shipped in 1959.

    pldm9pRPj.jpg




    Model 28-2, shipped around 1973. Note, this one has been refinished, the matte finish is a bit duller than the original finish on a Model 18.

    pnUfAIYnj.jpg




    Another Model 28-2. This one shipped around 1964. That is what the finish on a Model 28 is supposed to look like.

    po403jWfj.jpg




    I think that's it for 357 Magnums.

    Nest, on to the 44s.
     
    bangswitch, Reinz, Kookla and 3 others like this.
  5. shoebox1.1

    shoebox1.1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    646
    Location:
    mckinney tx
    DJ did you show a nice Malloy/ Reed model 15?
     
  6. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    65,285
    Location:
    Alabama
  7. Sneakshot92

    Sneakshot92 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    784
    Location:
    WI
    And what do we have here??
    She looks like she wants me to find a range and give her some lovin.;)
     
  8. orpington

    orpington Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2014
    Messages:
    720
    Unless I missed it, no blued Triple Locks yet. Here's a Target Model that shipped New Year's Day 1918. 20190501_191522_Burst01.jpg 20190501_191837.jpg 20190501_191903.jpg
     
    Reinz, Kookla, 2ndamd and 3 others like this.
  9. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,387
    Location:
    Nostramo (in absentia), Segmentum Ultima
    Oops, see below
     
  10. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,387
    Location:
    Nostramo (in absentia), Segmentum Ultima
    K-22?
     
  11. orpington

    orpington Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2014
    Messages:
    720
    And here's another Registered Magnum; one was posted earlier by someone else. The last photograph depicts the original lanyard ring, which is a rare feature. IIRC, only 5 Registered Magnum revolvers shipped with this feature. 20190518_221850.jpg 20190518_221841.jpg 20190518_221919.jpg 20190518_222120.jpg
     
    2ndamd, Reinz, NIGHTLORD40K and 3 others like this.
  12. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,794
    Location:
    Land of the Pilgrims
    Not a K-22. The hammer is a center fire hammer. And the tiny rear sight adjustment screw says it is not a K-38.

    I would guess it is a 38 M&P Target Model, the precursor to the K-38, which was in turn the precursor to the Model 14.
     
  13. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,794
    Location:
    Land of the Pilgrims
    On to the 44s.

    2nd Model Russian. Shipped in 1875. Caliber is 44 Russian.

    poZxQVGxj.jpg




    44 Double Action. Caliber is 44 Russian. This one has been reblued at some point, as can be seen by the blued hammer and trigger. The original front sight was gone so I had a smith replace it with an old dime. Shipped around 1881 if I recall correctly.

    pmy5zNFej.jpg




    New Model Number Three. Caliber is 44 Russian. Shipped in 1895 as part of a large shipment to Japan. Interesting to speculate about how it got back to the USA, perhaps in a GI's duffel bag after WWII.

    pmiyeOGkj.jpg




    44 Hand Ejector, 1st Model (Triple Lock). Almost no blue left on it at all, which allowed me to get it for a bargain price. Very early, very low SN. Roy Jinks says it shipped in 1907, even though SCSW says they did not ship until 1908. Notice the caliber marking. It simply says 44 S&W CTG, nothing about Special. Speculation is that the stamp saying 44 Smith and Wesson Special CTG had not been made up yet.

    pmKfgwaLj.jpg




    44 Hand Ejector, 1st Model (Triple Lock), Target Model. 44 Special.

    pnc5uYxuj.jpg




    44 Hand Ejector, 2nd Model. 44 Special.

    pofiTQjAj.jpg




    44 Hand Ejector 4th Model. 44 Special.

    pmWMlnKhj.jpg




    That's it for the blued 44s.
     
    2ndamd, Reinz, orpington and 2 others like this.
  14. NIGHTLORD40K

    NIGHTLORD40K Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,387
    Location:
    Nostramo (in absentia), Segmentum Ultima
    *drooling*
     
    Sneakshot92 likes this.
  15. orpington

    orpington Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2014
    Messages:
    720
    Driftwood,

    I didn't know you had a Triple Lock Target Model. When did you acquire it? Any more details, are you willing to provide the serial number or any details about how and where you came to acquire it, and have you lettered it?
     
  16. Viper1357

    Viper1357 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    260
    Location:
    MN
    Not sure exactly how much actual blue/bluing these are (maybe more blue black) but it's what I have....


    SW_R8_new sgts562.jpg

    SW442_416.jpg
     
    2ndamd and Reinz like this.
  17. jmace57

    jmace57 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    933
    Location:
    Texas
    Where do I start - 6 or 7 nickel ones mixed in there!

    the-lot-zpspunjsepd.jpg
     
  18. Gary W. Strange

    Gary W. Strange Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2018
    Messages:
    227
    These two are my favorite rimfire revolvers. Both .22s. The first picture is of my S&W model 18 no dash. It was made in 1958, the first year S&W started giving their guns model numbers. They only made model 18 no dash revolvers for a couple years. This one is in excellent condition. Has some of the prettiest blue I have ever seen. The grips are Culina, English walnut. I have the box, papers and tools for it. I like the pre model number name they called these. The .22 Combat Masterpiece. In my opinion they were true masterpieces. Firearms from that period of time were built and put together like they never will be again and the rimfires from that time were not just truck or knockabout guns. As much effort went into the rimfires as the centerfires. It is just the perfect size for carrying in the woods. Not too heavy, not too long, it is just the right size and weight. You know it’s there but it is not in the way and has enough weight to it to be a good shooter.
    The next revolver is a S&W .22/.32 Hand Ejector, Heavy Frame Target. Some of the earlier made ones, were called Beakeart models, after Phil Beakeart, the dealer that talked S&W into making them. This one was made in 1940, not a true Beakeart. It is an easy 90% revolver. It is an I frame revolver. A bit smaller than a J frame. I always liked the looks of these, the two screw extend grips, gives them a neat look. They are just neat revolvers, you don’t see many of today. I found this one in a gun shop, I Houston, last summer while on vacation. I wish they still made revolvers like these two today. I heard an old timer tell me, years ago, every time S&W added a dash and the number hater the dash went higher, most of the time S&W found away to build them cheaper. I remember a lot of people saying they were done with S&W when they stopped pinning the barrels. I guess I was done with the new S&Ws when they added the lock and put it on the side of the frame. To me the New S&Ws doesn’t look the same and don’t feel the same as older revolvers. I bought a couple with the locks but sold or traded them off. I couldn’t get used to the way the hole, stuck right on the side of the frame. I am glad there are nice older S&Ws to be found in the used market.
    E9F1D76A-E5C5-4A8F-8FCD-465F7C11A031.jpeg 1BEF479F-D5D6-4ECC-BE88-63DBF6055208.jpeg
     
    2ndamd, Gladius and Reinz like this.
  19. Reinz

    Reinz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    Texas
    Model 19 , got it around 1970.

    4D7381E7-7250-4F06-ABCE-FE4142966CE6.png
     
  20. Gladius

    Gladius Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    288
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    A few more...
    2013-01-01 13-23-49_0013a1.jpg 2011-08-03 14-35-04_0010A.jpg 2010-06-15 13-27-38_0001 a1.jpg 2018-11-06 12-55-45_0029a1.jpg
     
  21. SQLGeek

    SQLGeek Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    105
    Location:
    Richmond, TX
    My first, a 27-2:
    PhotoPictureResizer_200112_134051554_crop_4032x2326.jpg

    Here it is with the 28-2 I picked up a little while back:

    20200426_130848_copy_983x498.jpg

    I now need a 29-2 and an early model 586. :D
     
  22. Reinz

    Reinz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2008
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    Texas
    Old crappy pic of my Model 29, sorry. I bought this around 76/77.

    4AEBE039-70F9-4AEA-A1E1-A3A3DF16F09E.png
     
    2ndamd, brunowbe, SQLGeek and 3 others like this.
  23. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,794
    Location:
    Land of the Pilgrims
    Howdy

    If you happen to bump into that Old Timer again, tell him Smith and Wesson has ALWAYS looked for a way to make them cheaper. All the way back to 1857 when they made their first revolvers. (yes, 1857, not 1957). Any company that wants to stay in business must look for ways to cut the cost to manufacture, and S&W is no different than any other successful manufacturing company in that aspect. I could probably site you examples of engineering changes to drive down the cost to manufacture back in the 1860s if I sat down and thought about it.

    By the way, nice 'Bekaert'. I have one just like it. Mine shipped in 1940 too. At the top of the photo is a K-22 for size comparison. The 22/32 Heavy Frame Target at the bottom of the photo shipped in 1923.

    pmRP3rUnj.jpg
     
    2ndamd, orpington, Gladius and 2 others like this.
  24. Gary W. Strange

    Gary W. Strange Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2018
    Messages:
    227
    I realize every firearm manufacturer has had to find was to cut.cost, to stay in business. If you think about it, Ruger caused the end of the Colt Woodsman. Colt just couldn’t make the woodsman at a price to complete with the Ruger auto 22. Glock, in recent times, has cause them all to have to change their ways. We have gained a lot, but we have sure lost a lot. I much rather have the old stuff. Firearms made back in the day, were some fine stuff. You have a very nice 22/32 yourself. To me they are neat little revolvers.
     
  25. Driftwood Johnson

    Driftwood Johnson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,794
    Location:
    Land of the Pilgrims
    It is a never ending cycle. Remington dealt a death blow to the Winchester Model 12 with their Model 870 pump shotgun. They used stamped parts instead of the Winchester machined parts and the Model 12 could not compete in price.

    I prefer the old stuff too.

    "Firearms made back in the day, were some fine stuff"

    It's all relative. I'll bet you a donut if we could go back to 1892 there were guys saying how much better the Winchester Model 1873 was than the Model 1892. The Model 1892 was stronger, lighter, and less expensive to produce than the Model 1873, but us humans tend to not like something new.
     
    Kookla likes this.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice