Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Letter to Armalite (Help Review please)

Discussion in 'Activism' started by ZeSpectre, Feb 20, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    I could use some quick review so I can get this email sent to Armalite with regards to their recent decisions about selling in NY and other anti-rights locations.

    --------------------------------------------------
    To: Mr. Mark Westrom (Sales@Armalite.com)
    Re: Armalite decision with regards to NY and other locations.

    Mr. Westrom;
    The decision of ArmaLIte with regards to continuing to support sales to a "special group" (in this case individual police officers) in states that refuse to recognize the rights of citizens is very troubling and has strong implications for the future.

    In doing so Armalite is further promoting the notion that law enforcement is somehow an "elite group" who should not subject to the same rules as the rest of the citizens of a State/Local/Area; a notion that has seen enormous and unsettling "creep" since the days I was involved with LE organizations. This also serves to widen the chasm felt between an increasingly "militarized" police and the average citizen.

    Additionally, Armalite is significantly weakening the potential impact with regards to Legislators in these anti-rights states. Please consider these two scenarios;

    In the first one both police and non-police citizens are equally impacted by the predations of Legislators on our civil rights. Unable to obtain preferred equipment, grumbling and outright protest rapidly start making their way up the LEO chain. LEO and non-LEO citizens band together to end this foolishness.

    In the second scenario law enforcement is exempted and they look at the ordinary citizens and say "yeah that sucks" while they obtain their rifles and go on with their jobs and lives. Politicians look around and feel free to ignore non-LEO citizens because they are secure behind equipped LEO protection.

    Which do you think will get the politician's attention?

    I understand your desire to avoid risking the lives of LEOs but at this point we are talking about risk being forced on ALL citizens and I consider it morally indefensible to place higher importance on one group than the other.

    In closing, I respect ArmaLite's right to set their own company policies but I am dismayed at the implications inherent in your decision and hope you will reconsider and cease all sales to anti-rights locations. In the interim I will no longer consider the purchase of any ArmaLite products.

    Sincerely
    Mr. Zespectre
     
  2. plodder

    plodder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Messages:
    501
    Location:
    Deep in a bunker behind the cheddar curtain
    Your points are logical, valid and defensible. I would only suggest editing to get it to fit on 1 page. It will have a better chance of being read and acknowledged if it is concise & to the point.
     
  3. ZeSpectre

    ZeSpectre Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    5,503
    Location:
    Deep in the valley
    Thanks.
     
  4. akv3g4n

    akv3g4n Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2013
    Messages:
    428
    Location:
    Hiram, OH
    Here is my proposed edited copy. Just suggestions.

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page