Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Long range targets and 7mm rem. mag.

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by timmyb21, Jun 16, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. timmyb21

    timmyb21 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    Okay, so I have a Ruger M77 in 7mm mag and am having a personal conflict. I've gotten the long range shooting bug thanks to a friend with a Savage 10fp. I know that the 7mag can reach out and touch a target, but the current setup I have I am only comfortable with to about 200m. This is also my hunting rifle and is kind of hard on the recoil. I was told that a new stock could help with the kick due to mine being about 20 years old, newer designs are better. Also, the thin barrel starts to spread out the groups as it heats up. Sooooo...Should I get the new stock, have the barrel replaced with a match custom job, get a new scope and start trying to hit 600m targets? Or should I just save my pennies and buy a new rifle for target killing? Honestly, which would be cheaper, and who should I look at to research a new barrel for the Ruger? Thanks in advance guys...Tim
     
  2. jimmyraythomason

    jimmyraythomason Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    7,384
    Location:
    Alabama
    Long range rifle

    Replacing the barrel,setting the headspace and fitting a new stock will easily cost much more than a new Savage already equipped for long range shooting. It is a personal choice but I would readily opt for a new rifle for target killing and keep the Ruger for hunting. But then that's just me.:rolleyes:
     
  3. loadedround

    loadedround Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    3,343
    Location:
    Valley Forge, Pa
    Timmy: It is my opinion that you would be much better off saving your pennies to buy a new rifle of your choice. By the time you change the barrel, stock, and the trigger plus tuning up the action, you will have more money tied up in your original rifle than if bought a new one. Also consider what happens if go to sell it, you would get less than half if of what you put into it...if you're lucky! Go for a new target rifle of your choice!
     
  4. Quintin Likely

    Quintin Likely Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    898
    Location:
    Relay 3, Target 17
    I agree with the others, I'd buy a new rifle (that Savage model your friend's got is a fine shooting stick for the dollar).
     
  5. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,983
    I don't think I've ever seen a target rifle built on a Ruger action. Not that my 77V isn't accurate, but you can count on Remington, Savage, or Winchester (sob, snivel).

    The Savage factory F-T/R rifle is getting a good reputation in .308; and the Remington 700 Police is pretty dependably accurate. And both are upgradeable almost without limit as your needs require and budget allows.

    Get a GOOD scope.
     
  6. timmyb21

    timmyb21 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    Looks pretty one sided. Old M77 for hunting, (most likely) Savage 10fp for shootin'. Thanks guys...Tim
     
  7. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    Id keep your nice hunting rifle. then get a nice , all jacked up someting , in 7mm mag, and shoot some 180 grainers, at 3000 plus fps. this setup will get you out to 1000 meters.
     
  8. timmyb21

    timmyb21 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    I've heard good things about .300 win mag. Savage makes the 110fp in .300 win mag. Should I look closely at this for 1000m shooting? 1000m seems like such a long way, and to still be travelling at fatal velocity accurately is beyond me...for now. >:)
     
  9. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,983
    Are you in the USA?
    Reason I ask, we don't have many metric ranges hereabouts, we still do things in yards.

    Anyhow, the .300 Magnums are going out of favor amongst long range target shooters. The recoil is enough to affect your nerves in a day's shooting. There are still some in use but I don't think there are many new ones being sold or built.

    The .308 in good loadings, which are available as factory match ammunition, in case you are not a handloader, is adequate at 1000 yards. There are other calibers that will shoot a flatter trajectory with less wind effect, but you just about have to handload to get the full benefit, unless you have a large ammunition budget.

    I don't understand your reference to "fatal velocity", what are you planning to kill out there?
     
  10. timmyb21

    timmyb21 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    Yes I'm in the US, I just have been taught metric and still use it due to my job (medical, radiology). I don't plan on shooting anything other than targets at 1000 yards but just the fact that you're sending a 168 grain hunk of metal fast enough to kill something that far away, and accurately, just still amazes me. Like I said, 1000 yards is still a long way off for me. Thanks for the info on .300mag v. .308
     
  11. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    Hi,

    7RM is a great long-range cartridge. 7 doesn't have "that much" recoil in a 12-14# rifle, but recoil handling is aided by good stock "fit" to your body and shooting positions, and by the use of a muzzle brake.

    Most rifles that have accuracy problems can be "fixed", but it is good to question whether or not the investment of a lot of money in gunsmithing is worth it vs. buying a better rifle to start with.

    -z
     
  12. glockman19

    glockman19 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,699
    +1 You should easily be able to reach out to 1,000 yards effectively with 7mm.
     
  13. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,983
    I lately saw a 7mm on one of the short fat magnum cases; I think a .300 WSM necked down. Kind of stood out in the crowd. I haven't seen a 7mm R.M. target rifle. I only shoot NRA F-T/R, but that is alongside other disciplines with their own ideas of what is needed.

    The leading Long Range cartridge is likely the 6.5x284. At least that is what the US F-Class Team and the US Army Long Range team shoot. I think you can buy factory ammunition. There is a trend to lighter calibers that are easier on the shooters and the gun barrels. Lapua is making a try with the 6.5x47 and the 6BR guys are doing well, along with a whole host of wildcats.

    Oh, by the way, my plain ole .308 target load, a 175 gr SMK at 2650 fps is computed to arrive at 1000 yards at 1217 fps with 576 ft lbs energy.
     
  14. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    Whenever we look at what competitors are using, we need to make sure we understand what rules they are working around and how those rules affect equipment choices. NRA HP prohibits the use of muzzle brakes (and sound suppressors), which is going to favor lighter-recoil calibers.

    7mm Magnums have been used successfully at 1000-yard benchrest:
    http://www.6mmbr.com/gunweek071.html
     
  15. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,983
    1. Right-oh. NRA doesn't allow brakes and 40-60 record shots plus sighters can get a bit wearing with a magnum.

    2. He was shooting the caliber I saw near here, a 7mm WSM wildcat, NOT a 7mm Remington Magnum.

    I don't say you can't get hits with a 7mm R.M. but there are better ways to go than trying to make a match rifle out of an elk gun.
     
  16. George Hill

    George Hill Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,842
    Location:
    Uintah Basin, UT
    Before you buy a new gun, try a Limbsaver Barrel Deresonator.
    They work. Only twenty bucks and they solve most of your problems.
    http://www.madogre.com/Interviews/Limbsaver.htm


    The 7MM WSM is not a wildcat. That's a factory round. Unless he wildcatted the 7MM WSM to try to improve it, and in that case, never mind. But how would he improve efficiency in a cartridge that is just about as efficient as you can get?
     
  17. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,983
    The guy Zak cites .300 WSM necked down and I think the one I saw did, too. Little less overbore capacity.

    Do you use a rubber baby buggy bumper on your barrel? How much difference does it make?
     
  18. marksman13

    marksman13 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,425
    Location:
    Mississippi
    The 7mm WSM is a necked down 300 WSM, but it is a factory loading. I have one and it is actually a fairly popular new cartridge. It's been out for a few years now, but hasn't gained the popularity of the 300WSM. If he is wild catting a 7mmWSM then I want to see how he made it more efficient.:D
     
  19. Jim Watson

    Jim Watson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    21,983
    I guess you could go to the site given and compare his cartridge dimensions versus the factory version.
    I don't care, they all kick more than I want to put up with.
     
  20. trstafford

    trstafford Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    (Olathe) Kansas City, KS
    7 mm Mag was originally designed for 1,000 yd target shooting. It was used to win at Wimbledon.

    If you purchase a target rifle in 7 Mag and keep your hunting rifle, you will only have one caliber of ammunition to contend with reloading, only bullet selection will change because target bullets are not typically good for hunting and good hunting bullets might not give that extra fraction of an inch in accuracy.
     
  21. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    really the 7mm mag, in a 140 grainer, shooting 3000fps, is a bit better at bucking the wind , than a 300winmag shooting 180 grainers, at 3000fps, if my calculations are remembered right, so it is a good long ranger, plus you will have a bunch less recoil. I also recalled a guy who just shot a world record 1000 yd groups at a meet in England , I believe, and he used a 300wsm, necked down to 7mm, and was using either 140 or 160 grainers. If there is a 7mmwsm round out there, i'd be real interested in seeing how this round works out with the benchrest boys.
     
  22. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    Data
    Code:
    _Bullet_           _BC_ _MV_         0     200     400     600     800    1000    1200 | YARDS
    338LM 250         0.675 2950 >    0.00    1.67    6.99   16.47   30.72   50.49   76.65 | wind (inches)
    7RM 180 VLD       0.698 2850 >    0.00    1.69    7.08   16.66   31.06   50.98   77.29 | wind (inches)
    7RM 168 VLD       0.640 3000 >    0.00    1.73    7.23   17.08   31.95   52.66   80.20 | wind (inches)
    6.5-284 139       0.620 3000 >    0.00    1.78    7.49   17.71   33.20   54.84   83.70 | wind (inches)
    300WM 210gr VLD   0.640 2850 >    0.00    1.86    7.78   18.41   34.47   56.90   86.69 | wind (inches)
    260 139           0.620 2820 >    0.00    1.95    8.18   19.39   36.40   60.23   91.90 | wind (inches)
    300WM 190gr SMK   0.53* 2950 >    0.00    2.14    9.07   21.67   41.13   68.92  106.53 | wind (inches)
    308 155           0.508 2850 >    0.00    2.37   10.06   24.15   45.98   77.12  118.86 | wind (inches)
    M118LR            0.51* 2600 >    0.00    2.77   11.81   28.48   54.58   91.64  140.15 | wind (inches)
    
    338LM 250         0.675 2950 >   -0.00    0.33    1.53    3.00    4.73    6.73    9.06 | drop (mil)
    7RM 180 VLD       0.698 2850 >   -0.00    0.37    1.66    3.24    5.06    7.18    9.63 | drop (mil)
    7RM 168 VLD       0.640 3000 >   -0.00    0.31    1.48    2.93    4.63    6.63    8.97 | drop (mil)
    6.5-284 139       0.620 3000 >   -0.00    0.31    1.49    2.96    4.69    6.73    9.15 | drop (mil)
    300WM 210gr VLD   0.640 2850 >   -0.00    0.38    1.69    3.31    5.23    7.47   10.12 | drop (mil)
    260 139           0.620 2820 >   -0.00    0.39    1.75    3.43    5.42    7.78   10.58 | drop (mil)
    300WM 190gr SMK   0.53* 2950 >   -0.00    0.35    1.61    3.24    5.21    7.62   10.57 | drop (mil)
    308 155           0.508 2850 >   -0.00    0.40    1.79    3.58    5.79    8.51   11.88 | drop (mil)
    M118LR            0.51* 2600 >   -0.00    0.54    2.27    4.50    7.28   10.75   15.09 | drop (mil)
    
    338LM 250         0.675 2950 >    2950    2693    2450    2221    2005    1802    1614 | velocity (fps)
    7RM 180 VLD       0.698 2850 >    2850    2607    2376    2158    1953    1760    1581 | velocity (fps)
    7RM 168 VLD       0.640 3000 >    3000    2727    2469    2226    1999    1786    1589 | velocity (fps)
    6.5-284 139       0.620 3000 >    3000    2718    2453    2204    1970    1753    1553 | velocity (fps)
    300WM 210gr VLD   0.640 2850 >    2850    2585    2336    2101    1881    1676    1492 | velocity (fps)
    260 139           0.620 2820 >    2820    2549    2293    2054    1831    1624    1441 | velocity (fps)
    300WM 190gr SMK   0.53* 2950 >    2950    2627    2326    2047    1785    1548    1341 | velocity (fps)
    308 155           0.508 2850 >    2850    2519    2212    1929    1668    1441    1253 | velocity (fps)
    M118LR            0.51* 2600 >    2600    2280    1984    1712    1468    1266    1118 | velocity (fps)
    
     
  23. rangerruck

    rangerruck Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    8,374
    Location:
    Texas, baby!
    thanks for that Zak, very fast of you. I thought the 7mmmag was very likey, I am a bit suprised at the 6.5 , though, thought the 140 grainer would smoke them all,in all categories. I wonder what it would do with a 160 grainer, as opposed to the 7mmmag?
     
  24. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    The 6.5mm 140gr Berger VLD has the same advertized BC as the 7mm 168gr Berger VLD, so those two loads are going to be almost identical (in 6.5-284 and 7RM respectively)
     
  25. CD0311

    CD0311 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    Messages:
    24
    Location:
    Arizona, Iraq
    If you are ging to go on a factory rifle I would choose one of the short mags...

    I'm with you Zak..I'm trading in my 300mag for a 6.5..I have'nt desised on the .260 or 6.5-284 yet thouh
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page