Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Mr. Mosin, Nov 28, 2021.
I trust my LCP, and bought one for my beloved mrs also.
Even though it's been shot quite a bit for a sub compact, its still a gun that I consider a "often carried, seldom shot" gun.
Is this about service life or capacity?
That alone will tend to limit useful lifetime.
Think of all those 'pot metal' (often cast zinc) frames
(or even plastic) holding a steel barrel.
Unless youre buying high-end guns, most of the factory guns are reasonable enough so you wont break the bank in buying a pair.
If youre shooting any reasonable amount in practice, youll spend a lot more on the ammo you use for practice than what the gun costs anyway, especially with the smaller calibers like .25, .32, .380.
In that time, I have had to replace the takedown pin twice, since the head sheared off while shooting. This didn't stop the range session, it just made taking the gun apart afterwards harder. Also, the frame has been replaced once due to a crack around the rear frame pin. This also didn't 'kill' the gun though. At this time, the gun is all fixed up, and ready to eventually put in another 5k rounds!
My Walther PPK has just 1,000 rounds through it so far, and this weekend my trigger bar snapped in half at the range! Thankfully this didn't happen in a life or death situation! But it goes to show you the cheap gun can keep plugging along, while the expensive one can have a disabling malfunction. It's a crap shoot.
So long as the serialized part keeps working, everything else can be replaced.
Most haven't been zinc die cast in a long time. Many of the better mouse guns went to a polymer frame with steel insert which allows more recoil absorption and better service life with less cracking and higher round counts.
Diamondback DB9, M&P Bodyguard, Kahr CW380, Keltecs, Beretta Tomcat, Hi Point, Remington RM380, Bersa Thunder, Beretta Jetfire, Seecamp, SIG P238, Taurus Spectrum, TCP and Millenium, North American Guardian, just for starters.
The old Florida made die cast guns are now mostly collector items in the face of the new materials. Cheaper materials and fabrication with polymer.
If there has been a serious impact in the sales of mouse guns of late, it's caused by the P365, which has even cut short their own sales of .380s and the P938.
I think it's reasonable to say that the smaller and lighter the gun in a given caliber, the less durable it is likely to be. I don't think a precise answer is going to be forthcoming.
With or without parts replacement?
The maximum life of particular examples will likely exceed the expected maximum.
The number will likely far exceed what most anyone will actually fire.
My Walther PPK has just 1,000 rounds through it so far, and this weekend my trigger bar snapped in half at the range![/QUOTE]
Why do I think this PPK is only a couple of years old??? I have a lot of old ones that have never had a hiccup.
If you really want to know, you have to shoot them until you start to get failures. If you follow routine maintenance and change out the RSA's when you should, you will likely have better results than if you dont.
This ….. ^^^^
Most of my old guns that are out of warranty never needed a warranty to begin with. My 100 year old guns work like new.
Yes, brand new Fort Smith, AR model. To have such a major component fail with so few rounds does make me nervous about the metal quality of the new parts.
So they are NOS. It doesn't really prove anything as to their longevity, just that they are old.
The only way you really know if something will hold up, or how far it might go, is to shoot one enough and see. I dont think most people ever really get close to knowing, as most really dont shoot them enough to know. If you do, you will spend many multiples the cost of the gun trying to prove it too.
Probably a good rough estimate, that is near the round count when the frame cracked on mine. However, replacing the whole frame with a brand new one from Ruger was an easy and cheap fix, so I opted to keep it plugging along. Now it's ready for another 5k! The serialized part, in the case of the LCP, is a separate receiver which plugs into the frame. Some guns though, the frame itself is the serialized part, meaning if that cracks like my LCP did the gun is done for.
Only if properly serviced. Their PM cycles, mostly replacement of springs or (if present) buffers, is going to be much more critical. Likewise, exceeding any other limits like over-powered ammo will wear the gun much more than it would on a full size.
The Star PD is a good example. Trackskippy's comment about buying a pair is part of the thinking in a long-repeated quote from Jeff Cooper "carried much and shot little." It was about the PD — at the time a truly revolutionary gun in size and weight for a full-size cartridge. But, it was tiring to shoot and there were worries about longevity. People like Cooper bought a couple of guns, carried one without shooting (but to guarantee it works) and shot one that was never carried for practice. Another was for lightweight revolver shooters; practice with a steel version of the same exact gun. I know some who sent both guns to the same smith to get identical updates to sights, stocks, or triggers.
Anyway, lots and lots of PDs are a little worn out and rattly. A few cracked. But it appears that all worn/broken issues with these guns are the result of not replacing the buffers. Buffers were weird at the time, so it was unclear they had a service life and the factory didn't provide spares with the gun. They were available and those who replaced them with the springs had no issues. But a 1970s alloy framed .45 got plenty worn if you never changed the springs and buffer, yup.
I've put I don't know how many thousands of rounds through the Russian "commercial" Makarov that I bought NiB in 1988 or so. It hasn't even needed new springs yet.
I put about a thousand rounds through a P3AT. Then I gave it to my FiL. It malfunctioned a few times soon after he got it. He cleaned out the firing pin channel and replaced the springs. It seems okay for now.
My WAG, based on nothing in particular, is that sooner or later the metal inserts, or polymer supporting them, or something will wear out on an LCP type pistol. They are small and tightly sprung and made of light materials. 5,000 rounds? Sure. IDC. I just can't imagine them lasting tens of thousands of rounds.
A Makarov or mini 1911 or Colt 1903 or whatever... I doubt if a normal shooter wears one out in their lifetime. It will need new springs eventually, but I don't think that something like 32acp is going to wear out a generously proportioned steel pistol anytime soon.
This 1903 is over 100 years old. It has new grips and was refinished, but the mechanical parts look original and show mild wear. I replaced the springs and it shoots accurately and reliably. It looks like it will be NBD if someone puts a box of range ammo through it once a month for another bunch of decades.
The Makarov is a tank. Good luck wearing one out. It was overengineered for its original ammo, and this one is chambered in the milder 380. It has very few parts, and they look sturdy.
Colt 1903 by Tallball posted Jan 7, 2018 at 12:21 PM
Makarov380 by Tallball posted Jan 23, 2018 at 9:39 PM
Separate names with a comma.