Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Looking for a CA incident...

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by fjolnirsson, Jun 28, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. fjolnirsson

    fjolnirsson Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,746
    Location:
    Oregon, in the Willamette Valley
    I'm trying to find a link to a letter written by the grandmother of those kids in CA who were killed with a pitchfork. As I recall, the kids were well trained in the use of firearms, but had none available due to CA's "lock up your safety" type laws.
    Anybody remember this one?
     
  2. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Nevada, escaped from the PDRK via Idaho.
    This should give you a start.

    In Merced, California, in August 2000, a pitchfork-wielding man attacked and murdered Jessica Carpenter's 7-year-old brother and 9-year-old sister while their parents were not home. Jessica's father kept a gun in the home that was, in accordance with California law, locked in a safe. According to the family, Jessica, age 14, is a very good shot, and had the gun not been securely stored, Jessica would have been able to retrieve it and use it to fend off the murderer.
    The California mandatory gun-lock law helped kill two children in Merced.
     
  3. dasmi

    dasmi Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,781
    Location:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Whoa hold on. California mandates that you purchase a lock or safe at the time you purchase your gun. They do not mandate that it be locked up at all times.
     
  4. Guns_and_Labs

    Guns_and_Labs Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Messages:
    517
    Location:
    Hidden Away in the East Bay, CA
    Well, kind of they do. From Cal DOJ:

     
  5. fjolnirsson

    fjolnirsson Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,746
    Location:
    Oregon, in the Willamette Valley
    Well, not at all times. However, according to the CA penal code, if Jessica had access to a firearm and used it against the intruder, her parents(or owner of said firearm)could have been charged. It would be a gross miscarriage, but the letter of the law allows for such charges. It's a bad law.

    Here's the section:
    California Penal Code, Section 12035 (Deering 1995) (enacted 1991):

    (a) As used in this section, the following definitions shall apply:

    1. "Locking device" means a device which temporarily prevents the firearm from functioning, and when applied to the firearm, renders the firearm inoperable.

    2. "Loaded firearm" has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (g) of Section 12031.

    3. "Child" means a person under 16 years of age.

    4. "Great bodily injury" has the same meaning as set forth in Section 12022.7.

    5. "Locked container" has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (d) of Section 12026.2.

    (b) Except as provided in subdivision (c), a person commits the crime of "criminal storage of a firearm of the first degree" if he or she keeps any loaded firearm within any premise which is under his or her custody or control and he or she knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or legal guardian and the child obtains access to the firearm and thereby causes death or great bodily injury to himself, herself, or any other person.

    The "permission of the parent's" part is a little unclear, IMO. does that allow a blanket permission? Or must permission be given every time the kid shoots? Like most of CA's gun laws, very vague. And, of course, most people don't really know the law. Very few actually read the Penal code, and even fewer can decipher it....
     
  6. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    There are many such laws in the People's Republic of California.
     
  7. fjolnirsson

    fjolnirsson Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,746
    Location:
    Oregon, in the Willamette Valley
    Ain't that the truth.
     
  8. Hipster

    Hipster Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    AZ
  9. Can'thavenuthingood

    Can'thavenuthingood Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    California
    http://johnrlott.tripod.com/bna.html

    "To prevent unnecessary injury or death caused by improper storage of firearms in the home"

    Sounds like the firearm was improperly stored. If she had access, they may have survived.

    If the child is defending her home, age does not matter.

    Prosecution would depend on the zero tolerance zealot acting as district attorney.

    Vick
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page