Armor Snail
Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2013
- Messages
- 530
If you have a drivers license must you no longer walk?
You'll be allowed to do both under the currently proposed legislation. Currently only CHL holders will be able to OC if it passes.Does anyone know if you have open carry, can you still carry concealed in same state?
Thank you for your service.While I spent 22 years in the Army, protecting these jerks right to free speech, it is sad to see and hear these police officers in positions of authority not doing the same and actively trying to take our rights away.
Leon, Ive got 10 acres on a mountain top in the desert you need a 4x4 to get to. You can have it for 2grand right now. Taxes are paid up 90 bucks a year.I wish I had land near Sierra Blanca...I love that part of the world.
OC does come in handy out on the farm or ranch.
Just my .02,
LeonCarr
That's correct. "Gun Control" was originally meant to protect the Ku Klux Klan from armed blacks who might object to being hanged or whipped.It wasn't taken away for lack of being used. It really wasn't meant to be taken away at all--the fairly obvious intent when the law was passed right after the Civil War was to make it possible to prosecute freedmen who were bold enough to carry pistols.
And still outside the point, irrelevant in today's world.That's correct. "Gun Control" was originally meant to protect the Ku Klux Klan from armed blacks who might object to being hanged or whipped.
Why doesn't Texas just introduce a bill for Constitutional carry (CC) instead of OC. We have OC here and I never see it. People just don't want to advertise that they are armed. Same thing will happen in TX.
What people really need is constitutional carry. No permit to carry however you want. Police can't profile you if you look just like every other citizen walking down the street. If they want to stop you that's fine, but they will need a better reason than an OC.
OC just isn't all it's cracked up to be. It frightens soccer moms and causes the police to stop you based on the fact that they are the police and *something just doesn't look 100% right here*.
OC is fine down on the farm but for pavement dwellers it adds up to a right that few will take advantage of.
OC just isn't all it's cracked up to be. It frightens soccer moms and causes the police stop you based on the fact that they are the police and *something just doesn't look 100% right here*.
Hardly irrelevant. It shows "gun control" has always been an instrument of oppression.And still outside the point, irrelevant in today's world.
Well yeah, indeed. Sorry I misinterpreted.Hardly irrelevant. It shows "gun control" has always been an instrument of oppression.
Vote for people who don't look at the Constitution like it's a roll of Charmin would be a good start.So what else can be done to advance this legislation so it goes through as the first step to getting unregulated open carry through in TX?
Short term thinking leads to long term problems. If they thought backstabbing would send them packing you wouldn't have to figure out how to keep them from backstabbing. So why not tell them all that?Too vague and no real plan and not going to address the problem here/now, unfortunately.
At THIS particular time in THIS particular case what is actually being done to get the Texas legislators to follow through without backstabbing the 2A and the people of Texas on this legislation?
When do you expect significant activity towards a conclusion?Right now, the big enemy is time. Letting your Senators know that HB910 is acceptable to you with amendments and that you'd like to see a concurring vote on the bill scheduled as soon as possible is probably the shortest route.
The Texas House did us no favors. By reporting the House version rather than the Senate, the House added unnecessary delay to the process. The Schaefer amendment complicated that even further and the Dutton/Rinaldi Amendment had about 20+ votes from Representatives who had tried to block or sabotage HB910.