Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

lowest rings possible?

Discussion in 'Shooting Gear and Storage' started by greyling22, Jul 27, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. greyling22

    greyling22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,341
    Location:
    East Texas
    I am looking for the lowest weaver rings. Doesn't have to be the VERY lowest, but low. I have these leupold rifleman vertical split rings that midway calls .326 rings height, http://www.midwayusa.com/product/752178/leupold-1-rifleman-vertical-split-rings-weaver-style-medium-matte so I bought some burris zee low rings midway calls .130 rings height. http://www.midwayusa.com/product/701259/burris-1-zee-weaver-style-rings-matte-lowThey show up and are the exact same height. grrrrr. $25 wasted. I guess they are measuring different places. I wish that had been clearer. Anyway, I need lower rings. Anything lower out there?

    I have a short mag scope I am trying to place on a marlin 336 so rings placement is both odd and specific. I am stuck with using a picatinny rail so any DNZ or talley mounting systems will not work. Has to be weaver rings.
     
  2. Haxby

    Haxby Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    994
    Leupold rifleman horizontal split lows are low.
    Old fashioned Weaver lows are low.
    I don't know if either is appreciably lower than what you have now.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page