Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

M1A vs. M1A Socom vs. M1A Scout Accuracy

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Mr.Blue, Sep 18, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mr.Blue

    Mr.Blue Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    523
    Location:
    Limbo
    How much more accurate is the 22" inside of 300 yards or so? Is the Socom capable of sub MOA out to that range? What about the Scout?
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2011
  2. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    What I've read suggests that the accuracy of M1A rifles roughly follows this list from most to least accurate:

    22" match barreled, glass bedded models
    18" Scout model
    22" "loaded" (medium barrel, not bedded)
    22" standard models
    16" SOCOM
    16" SOCOM II with quadrail

    The idea of a SOCOM being sub-MOA at 300 yards is laughable. You would be lucky to get a glass bedded match barreled M1A to be sub-MOA at 300 yards. It is possible (for the glass bedded match barrel) but not easy. For some reason the Scout models seem to do quite well on average. But if you want sub-MOA you would do far better to look at another platform (namely AR-10 or bolt action).
     
  3. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,528
    Location:
    Alabama
    1996 was the last year the USMC shot the M14 as an across the course rifle. That year I talked to the Armorers and their standard was a ten shot group at or less than 3" at 300 yards.

    I think they shot using a cradle.

    People are very lucky to shoot under a MOA at 300 yards, wind for one thing, the slightest change of wind, and poof!, you are out.

    National Champions never shoot as well as Internet Commando's, so internet shooting standards are somewhat inflated.
     
  4. Oxide

    Oxide member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    Coventry
    Um, MOA is range independent, so it has exactly the same chance of being sub MOA at 100 as it does at 300. Perhaps you mean sub 1 inch groups at 300 yards (1/3 MOA), which would indeed be a laughable notion from a SOCOM.

    My standard M1A 22" shoots under 2 MOA with non premium commercial ammo.

    Edit: Not assuming effects from wind, etc that multiply with range.
     
  5. skipbo32

    skipbo32 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2010
    Messages:
    657
    my scout will out shoot my standard at 100yds by a half inch or so. out to 300yds...i dont know. if you are looking for sub moa accuracy and you have a socom....you need to look else where.

    from my experience with standard weight barreled M1As.....the 18" is real nice and will be very accurate.....but once you get out the the 300yd range as you mentioned....i believe the 22" will stay more accurate at that range and beyond.
     
  6. Averageman

    Averageman Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,439
    Location:
    Texas
    When shopping for my M1A I did a lot of research and for the money the Scout Squad is your best deal in my opinion.
    Thanks
    A/M
     
  7. Jason_G

    Jason_G Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,874
    Location:
    Louisiana
    It's because the barrel is shorter, and therefore stiffer, I'd imagine. You do give up some velocity, and therefore range, though.

    Jason
     
  8. fragout

    fragout Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2010
    Messages:
    654
    Location:
    TBD
    After owning and shooting the 3 you mentioned, my M1A Bush rifle would out shoot both the Std, and the Socom, but not by all that much, and out to 300yds you mentioned and then some.


    FWIW...... My Socom started out as a Socom II, and did shoot better once I removed the rails up front, and replaced them with a std hand guard. The rails are clamped to the bbl (Same as the scout mount), and in my case...had an adverse effect concerning consistent accuracy. ( I for one would be interested in what other M1A owners have found, regarding the scout mount). IE....... bbl harmonics.

    As they come from the factory, all have iron sights only. The 3 you mentioned all sport different front sight posts. They vary when it comes to height and width. The difference in height correspond with the differences in bbl lengths. The widths on the other hand have the most effects when it comes to acquiring a target. The Socom has a rather wide front sight post, and while this feature works rather well (in conjunction with this rifles larger rear sight aperture) for close quarter shooting, it makes it very challenging when it comes to the type of actual precision your referring to.



    There are other factors to consider when it comes to this type of rifle as well.....with the end goal of said rifle cycling smoothly, and with all moving parts returning to the same spot every time it is being fired....... to make it short and simple.

    Sub MOA at 300yrds?


    If you are serious about an actual sub MOA rifle then look here....
    http://www.gaprecision.net/

    George and company can make it happen. I haven't had the opportunity to speak with him recently due to my current job overseas right now, but he has built precision rifles from the M14/M1A platform. Not sure about the sub MOA requirement of yours however. Look at his website above and see what he has. If he says one of his rifles can do it, then it is the truth.;)


    The M1A std/Scout/Socom do not fall into this category. They are built to be extremely reliable/work in all environments/climates/weather conditions semiautomatic "battle/MBR" rifles, and cover this aspect very well from my experiences with them.

    FWIW..... The M14 works just fine in the role of DMR at work:)

    If you get one and shoot it long enough to "out shoot your own rifle", you can always look at additional options at that time.

    11B
     
  9. Mr.Blue

    Mr.Blue Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    523
    Location:
    Limbo
    Thanks. I haven't bought one yet, but I'm in the market for a semi auto .308 rifle.
     
  10. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    For accuracy, you can't beat the AR-10 styles, and for accuracy per dollar you can't beat the DPMS .308 models, particularly the LR-308 (24" SS barrel) and LR-308B (18" heavy c-m barrel). I'm not saying they are the best all-around, only that they are regularly the best for accuracy. Either one of those could reasonably be expected to be slightly sub-MOA (perhaps .9 MOA) with appropriate match ammo. Separately, Rock River claims 1 MOA for their .308 models (LAR-8) although I don't know if's well established that they reliably shoot that well. At the pricier end there are very nice options from LMT, KAC, Larue and Noveske.

    I own both an LR-308B and a Springfield "loaded" M1A, and I've previously owned another loaded M1A, so I'm not speaking purely from reading.

    Is sub-MOA a requirement? There are a lot of nice rifles that are great in all other ways but just won't regularly do sub-MOA, including most of the M1A models, as well as better FALs.
     
  11. X-Rap

    X-Rap Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,628
    I have the Scout Squad with the Burris Scout Scope, it is no precision target rifle but it fits its niche quite well. I think barrel length is relative to bullet stabilization and maximum velocity not accuracy. There are some very accurate 14" contender pistols and my 30-30 won't quite do MOA at 300 but it will hold under 5". I haven't really pushed my M1A1 from the bench yet, I guess it needs to be done.
     
  12. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,528
    One should remember the most significant criteria for the military (and law enforcement) of the weapon is reliability. The weapon must work each and every time the trigger is pressed. Accuracy takes second place. To make a military weapon super accurate means tampering with reliability. The weapon may become a prima donna such that if certain conditions are not satisfied (special ammunition, bedding condition, cleanliness) are not fulfilled, that it will not function reliably. Other concerns include parts interchangeability. The more specialized the part, the less likelihood that available spares are available. Thus, there is a tradeoff between accuracy and reliability.
     
  13. Oxide

    Oxide member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    Coventry
    While this is true, that is where real engineering comes in. It is quite possible to make a 100% reliable, accurate weapon. Maybe not eyeball at 500 yards accurate, but definitely accurate. It's also possible to make a 100% reliable weapon that is "battlefield accurate" or less. It's possible to make prima donna tack drivers, and it is possible to make total trash.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page