This is an on topic story. A situation that an armed citizen could actually find himself in:
The would-be victim told police that the boys had pistols, but he was also armed - and fired at them outside of his Houston apartment complex.
mol.im
This is surely going to be a very emotionally charged case.
I missed it in your story, but found it in another that the man and his significant other were both the intended victims, not just the man.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/3-young-...HdJEjiFqra5L5V97ka6q0l3gsCJ5t9NHnQ5TmOk25PlqA
A woman told ABC13 that she had fallen asleep on the drive home, and her boyfriend opened the vehicle door to carry her inside when several armed boys surrounded them in a robbery attempt on Christmas night.
So there was at least one other witness, so not the victim's words against the robber's.
-----------------------------
Outside his home? One youngster shot multiple times? Those optics are bad no matter how it plays out in the court of public opinion and the grand jury. I wonder if the kids got off any shots - who shot first….was this a running gun battle, parties all know one another …. a lot to sort out
It does sound bad....for the youth. You are correct. A bunch of armed boys trying to rob a man and his girlfriend after at night. They ambushed him at his parking spot, almost like they were waiting on a victim. Yeah, sounds, pretty bad for the youth.
Doesn't really matter who shot, first, if they were trying to rob him and it was after dark as well. Does not matter if they knew each other.
Let's see, the man and his girlfriend were the victims of attempted robbery by 4 armed youth. He shot 3. Cops find wounded youth and weapons at crime scene and then 2 more wound youths and a 4th, uninjured youth, show back up to the crime scene and are summary taken into custody. So far, nothing reported sounds like bad optics for the would-be victim except for the bleeding hearts worried about the youth. As for the grand jury, not likely to be a problem in Texas if the events are as described so far.
That's true. However in the media environment we live in now cold, rational judgement isn't a factor.
So far, the media seems to be doing just fine. Many of the outlets aren't even calling robbery and victims (man and girlfriend) to be "alleged."
Now, if we learn that the would-be victim did stuff like Ersland in 2009, or if all the guns at the crime scene were planted by the victim, then there could be trouble, but so far, no such information like that has come forward.
And if we are worried about the poor tykes, youth gangs are nothing new. Here is where a group of 3, 11-16, robbed a bank in Houston earlier this year (Carl mentioned above, but here is a link).
The juveniles, ages 11, 12 and 16, were caught on camera robbing a Wells Fargo bank March 14, the FBI said.
www.nbcnews.com
Of course, we are now left with 4 youths who will have some new street cred after this is over, especially 3 of them. They will have more after juvie. What will be interesting is how this affects their lives. Will they continue in a life a crime?