Marlin 1889

Status
Not open for further replies.

.45Guy

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
2,303
Well, I just got home with a Marlin 1889 manufactured in 1893 for less than the cost of a used Hi-point. She is ugly as hell on the outside, but locks up tight and has a great bore. Will be trying her out with some of the anemic CAS loads that advertise a MV of 700 FPS.
 

Attachments

  • 0204122140.jpg
    0204122140.jpg
    49.4 KB · Views: 51
Well, I detail stripped it, attempted the electrolysis method to kill the active rust, and replaced all the springs. (An adventure in itself.) I got it all back together yesterday, and took it out with a few of the Ultramax CAS loads. There is only one word to describe it: FUN! The anemic little CAS loads sound about like a PCP airgun; that is until they ring steel.
 
Think you might have something more than you think... Standard barrel length on the 1889 was 24 inches. Your rifle looks to me like it has a longer tube. (Marlin offered barrels over standard length - up to 32 inches - at a dollar an inch.) Might want to measure yours. Special order rifles carry a significant
increase in value Folks at http://www.marlinowners.com and http://www.marlin-collectors.com have a wealth of information available.

Round barrel or octagon? And what kind of sights does it carry? The bottles kind of obscure a good view of the old horse.
 
Air, it is a 24" octagon. The bottles are rather strategically placed to hide ugly spots. One, the pitting near the muzzle, and two the boogered screw head from when I got a little P/O'ed after the third time taking things apart to get the piano wire replacement mainspring to work. I sliced my thumb, and instead of walking away, I kept going. Not the best laid plan.
DSCN2545.gif
DSCN2546.gif
 
Son of a gun! I'd have sworn that had a longer than standard barrel. Good honest old 1889 nonetheless. Enjoy!
 
I haven't attempted it, but I'm pretty sure it is 15. After doing the requisite ciphering, 14 and 1 in the chamber.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top