Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Marlin 60 and the upcoming AWB?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by texgunner, Dec 31, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. texgunner

    texgunner Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    223
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I just read a provision in Feinstein's new AWB that would ban the sale, manufacture, importation and transfer of:

    "Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can except more than 10 rounds;"

    If I'm reading that correctly my Marlin 60 with it's 14 round fixed tube magazine would be an NFA Class III firearm. Seriously?!

    God, I really hope the good Senator's AWB bill fails. :cuss::
     
  2. texgunner

    texgunner Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    223
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Sorry gents, that should be Marlin in the title. I'm not very good at typing on a smart phone. :eek:
     
  3. Texan Scott

    Texan Scott Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,184
    Location:
    The Texas Hill Country
    "Upcoming"? It's not "upcoming"... it's being proposed, but it's not gonna happen.
    Write your Congresscritters, help the NRA fund, and quit worrying like it's inevitable.
     
  4. Yo Mama

    Yo Mama Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,873
    The Marlin 60 is a perfect example of why the bill stands the biggest chance of defeat in committee. IMO, as a few have discussed, if the bill really only targeted ak and ar type firearms, it probably would have passed. They went for broke, and it's not going to settle well when everyone's 10/22 is targeted.
     
  5. Hillbillyz

    Hillbillyz Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    201
    I think I heard/read that tubular magazines were not included in the madness that is that proposal.
     
  6. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,949
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
  7. texgunner

    texgunner Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    223
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Well that's good. The website I was reading didn't include that last part.
     
  8. 45_auto

    45_auto Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,168
    Location:
    Southern Louisiana
    Yeah, everything will be fine since it's not going to affect your gun .....
     
  9. berettaprofessor

    berettaprofessor Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,897
    Location:
    Kansas
    That was dripping with sarcasm...in case anyone isn't sure. Nice point, 45_auto!
     
  10. ApacheCoTodd

    ApacheCoTodd Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,609
    Location:
    Arizona
    If it happens as an overlay to California's type of ban - I wouldn't count on the above given the effect of the Cal AWB on the Henry holding more than 10 in the tube.
     
  11. phil dirt

    phil dirt Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    321
    Location:
    Northwest
    Pardon my stupidity, but how should one define "fixed magazine"?
     
  12. ApacheCoTodd

    ApacheCoTodd Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,609
    Location:
    Arizona
    Magazine: An ammunition storage and feeding device within or attached to a repeating firearm.

    Fixed: Neither removable nor detachable without tools.
     
  13. statelineblues

    statelineblues Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    836
    Location:
    In PA
    Posted by texgunner:
    It already is in New Jersey - the original Marlin Model 60 had a 17 round fixed tube magazine. A court challenge went all the way up to the NJ Supreme Court and it was found to fall under the NJ AWB, so all older Model 60's are banned.

    Thanks to NJgunforum.com.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2012
  14. ball3006

    ball3006 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,874
    Location:
    Texas
    The early Marlin 60s..

    had 17 shot tube mags. Some of the early tube mag rifles will shoot 22 short so you can cram 20 or so rounds in them. How long does it take to empty a tube mag 22 rifle? Not long and no recoil to condend with....chris3
     
  15. texgunner

    texgunner Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2006
    Messages:
    223
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I also have two ARs and three pistols with mags that hold more than 10 rounds. I was going through my collection and was curious about my M60 after reading what I saw. I have 20+ mags for those ARs and pistols so I do have a lot to lose. Your sarcasm really is not warranted.
     
  16. Deer_Freak

    Deer_Freak Member.

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    662
    Location:
    North Carolina
    There are provisions in Fienstein's bill for 22 rifles with a tubular magazine. Well, it's not a bill just yet. It is the ramblings of a paranoid lunatic who managed to get a carry permit despite her illness.
     
  17. ApacheCoTodd

    ApacheCoTodd Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,609
    Location:
    Arizona
    Of course she'd go that way as her CalAWB exempts rimfire tube feeds as well. This is part of their "See, we're being reasonable..." tactic.
     
  18. MAKster

    MAKster Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    2,231
    California's AWB requires ARs to have a fixed magazine but it's a stupid requirement since the "tool" used to detach the magazine (bullet button) is as simple as the tip of a .223 cartridge or a pen.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page