Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

marlin 795, peep or scope?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by mdub, Jan 5, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mdub

    mdub Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    i picked up a marlin 795 22lr over the holiday and I want to put some kind of improved sighting system on it. I really like the idea of putting a peep sight on it but i know i can go cheaper by getting a scope.

    I'd be using this mostly for target and plinking, maybe Appleseed if one ever comes back to the general area.

    I don't mean to stir up the pot with this post, so it it gets out of control please shut it down.
     
  2. Hunterdad

    Hunterdad Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,873
    Location:
    Syracuse, NY
    I put a scope on my 795 and couldn't be happier with it.
     
  3. threoh8

    threoh8 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    154
    Location:
    Lubbock, Texas
    Which do you prefer?

    For general shooting, I prefer a good aperture receiver sight and a post front. GI-style protective wings are OK, but not necessary. I do like to have no-tool elevation and windage adjustments at the rear sight. I've used the Williams Foolproof with target knobs on several rifles, and assorted pure target sights on others.

    Sometimes, though, it's nice to have a clear, magnified view of the target. My bull-barrel 10/22 has a variable that works well enough.
     
  4. travisd

    travisd Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Messages:
    333
    Location:
    South Dakota
    I put a Bushnell rimfire 4x32 on mine
     
  5. Steel Horse Rider

    Steel Horse Rider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    2,105
    Location:
    Loveland, Colorado
    I think the type of aiming device used for general plinking and recreational shooting is more a matter of want than need. I prefer the aperture type rear sights with a ball post or hooded front sight for general shooting at less than 300 yds, beyond that or for plinking on prairie dogs I prefer some magnification to allow better shot placement. I find scopes are usually detrimental to target acquisition for plinking. Just my $.02.
     
  6. Inebriated

    Inebriated Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,681
    Location:
    NC
    I put a 3-9x on it that I had laying around. I like it a lot.
     
  7. mdub

    mdub Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    Thanks for sharing your experiences. I realize most of what is making this decision difficult for me is that i'm being cheap. I often have difficultly with what i call being "efficient" or not spending too much but buying what will work most effectively.

    i think what i want is the tech-sights, but i know i can get the Berska Plinker for about half the price. But for a scope my better sense tells me to buy something better like a rimfire Leupold or Nikon, but that is putting some serious investment into a $90 rifle.
     
  8. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
  9. Inebriated

    Inebriated Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,681
    Location:
    NC
    I've got a Tasco somethin-or-other, and it was $30 at WalMart. Keeps zero, and gives good options (3-9x). But that UTG looks pretty cool... Might get one to throw on the WASR or something. I imagine it could hold up to the light recoil.
     
  10. mdub

    mdub Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    15
    henschman,

    the leapers is interesting, but it seems to be more of a rifle scope than a 22, do you think parallax is something i should care about?
     
  11. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    I think it is a PERFECT .22 scope! In fact, that's about ALL I would use it for... I wouldn't put a scope that is that cheap and made by that manufacturer on any center fire that is intended for any kind of serious use.

    Parallax is nothing to worry about... it is only an issue if your head is positioned inconsistently in relation to the scope from shot to shot. Just make sure you have a consistent sight picture, which comes from having a consistent shoulder pocket, turkey neck, and cheek weld... Appleseed will teach you more about that! ;) Anyway, no scope, even one with an adjustable objective, is truly "parallax free," and you can't make up for poor fundamentals with fancy equipment. Just learn how to shoot properly, and parallax will not be an issue.
     
  12. gidaeon

    gidaeon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    332
    Location:
    south east MI
    I ran tech-sight peeps on my marlin 795 and shot rifleman over my first appleseed weekend. I was able to find tech sights used, maybe you could too? After a few more appleseeds I changed it over to a 3-9 AO scope and my wife often shoots that and she and both then accomplished our best scores that way. The rail doesn't go back as far as I'd like and many 795 rails are cut in a canted manner.

    If you go with a scope skip the rings that don't stay put and use a one piece leapers mount for whatever height you prefer. No joke, the guys on rimfirecentral forums love them and the big long piece stays put! Good price too.

    Both options have their place. If you already have other scoped setups I vote tech sights. Shooting irons well is more satisfying than doing such w/ a scope :neener:
     
  13. Mauser lover

    Mauser lover Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Location:
    SD!
    I have had a barska 3x-9x on my Marlin .22 for a couple of years now. Nice and clear, had no problems with it whatsoever, but I do use Weaver rings.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page