Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

McMillan vs. Accuracy International

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by DocHarman, Oct 2, 2006.

?

McMillan vs Accuracy International

  1. McMillan

    32 vote(s)
    38.1%
  2. Accuracy International

    52 vote(s)
    61.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DocHarman

    DocHarman Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    29
    Location:
    Lewisburg, West Virginia
    If you were building a rifle in .308 (off of an remington 700,) would you chose a professionally bedded McMillan A5 or an Accuracy International chasis?

    All comments are welcome!
     
  2. L.Puckett

    L.Puckett Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    39
    Location:
    Mid-TN
    Doc,

    I wish I had a good answer for you. I have 2 of each since I can't make up my mind either. LOL.

    My best suggestion is to get down behind each one (somehow) and dry fire each for several minutes and see which one you prefer. To me they both are very comfortable.

    My observations though are: the AICS is more of a prone stock (not exclusive though), the A-5 is better for all positions. Beware the "saddle" cheek piece on the A-5's versus the adjustable pillared type. The saddle will put your eye a little more off the bore center line and with a critical eye relief scope (high power) it will not be quite as comfortable.

    Both stocks should be bedded to obtain the best accuracy.

    LP
     
  3. IV Troop

    IV Troop Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    307
    AICS is out of buisness. I have an A5 Mcmillian and prefer it but it is all in how it fits You not me.
     
  4. Mute

    Mute Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2003
    Messages:
    962
    Location:
    Behind occupied territories. CA.
    I like both stocks but I prefer AI, YMMV. Also, AI is not out of business. They had some financial issues but they are back up and running. Tac Pro Shooting Center is their primary distributor here in the U.S.
     
  5. SILENTSOUL308

    SILENTSOUL308 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    50
    one vote for mcmillan, I have an A5 that I love, but sadly I cannot say I've ever used an AI. The AI's look pretty cool though :)
     
  6. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    AI is not out of business. The AICS is in very limited supply or unavailable, though, supposedly due to the war in Iraq. I have NO IDEA if that is accurate, that is just what I heard.

    AI is still around, though.

    Mike
     
  7. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    AICS vs. a McM stock comes down to personal preference and ergonomics. Once you add a DBM and bed it, they are about the same cost anyway.
     
  8. ALS

    ALS Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    226
    Location:
    PA
    Again it is personal preference. My opinion McMillan make one of the finest guns out there. That isn't just my opinion but Col. Norm Chandler Sr. of Iron Brigade Armory's also. If I didn't like my 3 Chandler's so much I would own a few McMillan Bros rifles.:evil:

    Accuracy International makes one very nice gun.
     
  9. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    I thought we were talking about stocks???
     
  10. boonie

    boonie Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    53
    What is the consensus on bedding an AICS type stock?

    I've seen some sources say that it needs to be bedded, and others say that it doesn't.

    I've always thought that bedding was to help eliminate shifting of the receiver in a soft wood stock, and that the aluminum chassis would eliminate this problem.
     
  11. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    It's not required.
     
  12. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,452
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
  13. DocHarman

    DocHarman Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    29
    Location:
    Lewisburg, West Virginia
    Thanks for the comments thus far. First, I was under the impression you did not (or could not) bed an AI. Anyone have a definite answer to this? Second, the AI will actually be cheaper, if I do not have to bed it.
     
  14. L.Puckett

    L.Puckett Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    39
    Location:
    Mid-TN
    DOC,

    Zak knows AI's better than most folks and I agree, bedding per AI is not necessary.

    The man that builds my best rifles is Terry Cross, and he feels that there is an accuracy gain in using a small amount of bedding in the rear and near the recoil lug. His rifles shoot amazingly well, so I go with his recommendations.

    I would think that you could start without and somewhere down the line if you want have it bedded.

    LP
     
  15. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    Is that "not necessary" as in:

    1. Will do nothing to benefit accuracy?

    or

    2. still might do something small/minor to benefit accuracy, but you could get away without it?

    My inexperienced opinion was that using the chasis system made bedding completely unneeded, and that bedding might actually make things worse, since you're fiddling around with the stock/receiver interface (and maybe even de-floating the barrel), and the whole point of the chasis was to make the interface as rock solid and simple as possible (but, like I said, I'm inexperienced in this regard).

    So...which is it? Any idea?

    Mike
     
  16. Jonathan

    Jonathan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    Messages:
    227
    Location:
    Montana
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    No, it's not my action or test. 25 in-lb on the rear bolt.
     
  17. DocHarman

    DocHarman Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    29
    Location:
    Lewisburg, West Virginia
    Price difference

    I was researching McMillan prices, and there prices are pretty high. I am looking at a $475 for the stock, with at least $250 dollars in upgrades and another hundred (or $200) to get it bedded.

    The AI chasis is $750 for the whole sha-bang, if I don't get the folding stock.

    Decisions, decisions!!!
     
  18. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    The vast majority of AICS users just screw the action onto the chassis, shoot, and get great results.

    Terry also knows what he's doing.
     
  19. kieran

    kieran Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    80
    AI are most definitely not out of business. right now, demand is far outstripping supply.

    i'm a tall bloke with 'long' hands. there is something about the AI stock's thumbhole which is more comfortable by design. i prefer the non-vertical grip as well, compared to the 'cornerpiece' grip of the a-5.

    it does come down to small considersations. the AI stock is more expensive initially, but if you try one and like it, you wont need to replace it. though you might end up buying more. ;)
     
  20. Erud

    Erud Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2004
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    MN
    I was asking the same question about a month ago while looking to re-stock my 700P. I was not able to test either stock and I decided on the AICS 1.5 based on reviews and other info I found online. Price was also a factor, and the money saved on gunsmithing to bed the action and install a DBM tipped the scales to the AI. I have been very happy with it so far - without bedding I have seen a slight accuracy increase over the factory HS Precision stock. Tac Pro had them in stock when I ordered and I had it to my door in about 4 days. Resale value on either stock should be pretty good, so if you are unhappy you can probably get most of your money back.

    Good luck,
    Erud
     
  21. Sogmanzulu

    Sogmanzulu Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    NY
    Any thoughts...

    I have the 700P in .300 Win Mag, and am interested in the AI Chasis. The price seems right, but I have others are trying to influence me to buy American. I like the way the AI looks over the McMillan, but I have never held either in my hands. Any coments on the AI's quality?
    :confused: :banghead:
     
  22. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,452
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    Terry built my last rifle. He does indeed know what he's doing.

    Don
     
  23. thertel

    thertel Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    61
    I'm biased as I work for TacPro, but I do like the look and feel of the AICS over the McMillan units. The supply of AICS's has been very short for the last little bit, due to quite a few reasons but they are definently still being made and imported.

    Thomas
     
  24. Sogmanzulu

    Sogmanzulu Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    5
    Location:
    NY
    Thomas,

    I called TacPro yesterday inquiring about the AI chasis, and I spoke with a lady who asked me about the PSS being built before 2007. She stated that the recoil lug is different on the newer PSS rifles. I bought my .300 Win PSS in 2002, but am thinking about buying a new PSS in .338 Lapua (if I can find a dealer that has one). I wanted to be able to swap the stock back and forth between the rifles. Any idea if this would be possible?
     
  25. thertel

    thertel Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2006
    Messages:
    61
    Thats a good question, I didn't know about the recoild lug being different on the 2007 PSS rifles, I'll ask Bill when I get a chance about that for you
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page