Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

mentioned in the past, that this could come to your state, read on

Discussion in 'Legal' started by alan, Dec 28, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. alan

    alan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,598
    Location:
    sowest pa.
    See the page 2 article, 10 January issue of Gun Week www.gunweek.com, I believe there is a week or so delay between hard copy publication, and same appearing on-line.

    Anyhow, the piece is entitled California Lawmaker Files Ballistic Imaging Prtoposal. Does this surprise anyone? Another legislative boob also wants to enact registration of long guns (rifles and shotguns). If that is accomplished, looking at recent California history, will confiscation be all that far behind??

    Keep your eyes and ears open, as California is often billed as "the model to be emulated by others". I could never quite understand why, but as readers are likelt aware, it is so described.
     
  2. PATH

    PATH Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Location:
    Rockland, New York
    Withany luck California will sink into the sea and take the anti-gunners down!
     
  3. RAY WOODROW 3RD

    RAY WOODROW 3RD Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Beverly, N.J.
    Already voted on and passed in NJ the same time they passed the smart gun bill in 2002.
    I think the Balistic fingerprinting needs to be voted on by the other house though befor it becomes law. It starts out voluntary and then will shift into mandatory I'm sure.:banghead:
     
  4. alan

    alan Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,598
    Location:
    sowest pa.
    Ray:

    Looking at the record, past performances that is, do you think there is any question re how "the other house" will vote on ANYTHING with connotations of "gun control"?
     
  5. Mustang

    Mustang Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23
    The ********** Atty Gen just buried a report showing how grossly ineffective ballistic fingerprinting is. This report confirms an earlier report showing the same thing. They just want to harrass, annoy, and take gun ownership apart piece-by-piece.

    I saw a signature line once that said something like: "When it's time to hide your guns, it's time to use them." I agree.
     
  6. Cal4D4

    Cal4D4 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    629
    Location:
    SoCal
    Look at it this way. When things really get desperate, we know where to go for once fired brass. (Trying hard to put a good spin to this)
     
  7. RAY WOODROW 3RD

    RAY WOODROW 3RD Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    335
    Location:
    Beverly, N.J.
    alan

    Alan, we are working on that problem as we speak. We are organizing and getting ready to kick some butt!

    If that fails, what's your neighborhood like?:what:
     
  8. Tady45

    Tady45 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    117
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Well, think of it this way. It will create a few more highly paid Gov jobs to manage this nonsense in a State with a $35 billion dollar deficit. Bumbling bureaucrats, who can't agree on the color of S@#%




    Larry
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page