Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Military Times Tests Various Collapsible AR Stocks

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Justin, Feb 4, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Buttstock Bashfest: GearScout finds out just how far tough talk goes.

    What makes a good collapsable stock? One that’s rigid, offers a good cheekweld surface, has a solid, simple locking mechanism and the ability to hold up to bumps and drops inherent to battlefield conditions.

    Solid lockup can be had across the board, but look for a secondary friction lock if you get annoyed by rattling. Though, that rattle also equates to a tiny amount of play in the system and could have an effect on the rifles accuracy when taken to extremes.

    Sling attachment points should suit your carry and shooting style. Tube tops should be smooth and fit your face. That goes for the hairy among you, interruptions in the cheekweld surface will pull beard hair and cause a loss of concentration. Of course, weight and size are constant considerations, and modularity fits here, too. Some stocks have removable storage that can be pulled to save ounces if not needed.

    Click article link for the whole interesting read.
     
  2. HKGuns

    HKGuns Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,396
    Location:
    Bora Bora
    Boy, not many of them appear to be very good.
     
  3. Dr.Rob

    Dr.Rob Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    14,886
    Location:
    Centennial, CO
    Amen to this. That is my ONLY real complaint about the std. Colt M-4 stock is the little hole that rips the hairs out of my beard. I tried pac-skin on it but if you move the stock to far forward the charging handle can pull up the pac-skin. Why that hole is there? I don't know I suspect it's drilled all the way through as part of the Mfg. process.
     
  4. Z-Michigan

    Z-Michigan Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    4,047
    Location:
    Michigan
    It's a decent test, but most of the stocks are just fine, even near the bottom. You don't actually hear about most of those breaking in real use.

    Not certain but I believe the stock is simply molded and the hole is not needed for anything drilled. Some buffer tubes have numbers etched on the top to tell you the stock position. My guess is that the hole is there so you can read those numbers.
     
  5. jpwilly

    jpwilly Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,892
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
    Why wasn't a standard 6 pos stock tested against the rest?
     
  6. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,365
    vast majority of collapsible AR15 stocks i've seen broken were from "pogoing" and firing heavy recoil cartridges

    can't speak to military dropping their rifles, but dropping a gun in most competitions is instant DQ. if someone drops one more than once, i'm going to start suggesting different hobbies.
     
  7. -v-

    -v- Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,217
    JP - It was. It was the M4 DS Arms stock, which by all appearances is your standard plane-jane 6-position M4 stock. Its the 2nd one written up on the list.

    I believe the hole on top of most collapsible stocks is for the installation of the locking mechanism into the stock. Not sure though.
     
  8. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    +1

    Only dead AR stocks I've seen are from pogoing.

    I think this test would be more meaningful if the used a rifle and not a dead weight. Dropped from different angles to test side force impact.
     
  9. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,638
    Location:
    SW MO
    Most stocks in military use can be broken regardless. If the stock didn't, then the buffer tube would be the next weakest link. You can shoot a busted stock, you can't shoot a busted buffer tube.

    With fixed, there's a lot more engagement at the back of the receiver, I imagine it would take 1000's of drops to damage something - likely at the butt plate where it seems to crack or split.

    What it does go to show is that if you make something more complex, it has a higher likelihood of failure. If absolute reliability and extreme durability is paramount, then don't use a collapsible stock. Or, live with it. It's a matter of choice, not a hierarchy of moral puritanism.
     
  10. jpwilly

    jpwilly Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,892
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
    V, thanks for pointing that out missed it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page