jad0110
Member
Shot placement. Weapon reliability and convenience (does it work and will you carry it?). These are IMHO, the first and foremost factors in selecting a defensive sidearm. Once you have found a particular platform that meets your requirements, select a load that gives at least X amount of penetration. The FBI minimum is 12", so that can be used as a benchmark.
So in that regard, a 22 for some people can meet most of those requirements, though I'm not sure about penetration depth, that's probably kinda dicey with a 22. I would not be above using a 22. I certainly would not want to get shot with one. The biggest problem I have with the round is that it is a rimfire, and rimfires tend to misfire more than centerfires.
My mother is just now looking into a gun for protection. I've taken her to the range once, and from what I've gather thus far, she is extremely recoil sensitive. I even think my father's all-steel 9mm Baby Eagle will be far too much for her. So a 22LR is probably going to be the best option for her; it certainly beats nothing.
As for felt recoil between 380 and 9mm, it depends on the platform. I can barely hold onto a tiny Kel-Tec P3AT in 380, but that isn't a fair comparison to the somewhat larger/heftier 9mms. I personally find the recoil of a steel 380 and a steel single stack 9mm to be about the same, but I've met people that sware the 380 has less felt recoil and vice versa. Just goes to show that felt recoil is highly subjective, and what feels good to one may not feel good to another. How a particular gun fits in a particular set of hands has a big impact on how recoil feels.
With careful load selection, the 380 can be a very viable choice. So can the "lowly" 32 ACP.
My primary defensive handgun calibers are 38 Special and 45 ACP. I am comfortable with either, but both are handgun rounds. Power is sacrificed for portability. I carry one or two everywhere I can (even at home), but when at home I have a 12 gauge nearby that I can access fairly quickly. And when I prove my AR to be reliable enough, that will be an option too.
So in that regard, a 22 for some people can meet most of those requirements, though I'm not sure about penetration depth, that's probably kinda dicey with a 22. I would not be above using a 22. I certainly would not want to get shot with one. The biggest problem I have with the round is that it is a rimfire, and rimfires tend to misfire more than centerfires.
My mother is just now looking into a gun for protection. I've taken her to the range once, and from what I've gather thus far, she is extremely recoil sensitive. I even think my father's all-steel 9mm Baby Eagle will be far too much for her. So a 22LR is probably going to be the best option for her; it certainly beats nothing.
As for felt recoil between 380 and 9mm, it depends on the platform. I can barely hold onto a tiny Kel-Tec P3AT in 380, but that isn't a fair comparison to the somewhat larger/heftier 9mms. I personally find the recoil of a steel 380 and a steel single stack 9mm to be about the same, but I've met people that sware the 380 has less felt recoil and vice versa. Just goes to show that felt recoil is highly subjective, and what feels good to one may not feel good to another. How a particular gun fits in a particular set of hands has a big impact on how recoil feels.
With careful load selection, the 380 can be a very viable choice. So can the "lowly" 32 ACP.
My primary defensive handgun calibers are 38 Special and 45 ACP. I am comfortable with either, but both are handgun rounds. Power is sacrificed for portability. I carry one or two everywhere I can (even at home), but when at home I have a 12 gauge nearby that I can access fairly quickly. And when I prove my AR to be reliable enough, that will be an option too.