Mossberg 500 or Winchester 1300?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know - rentals aren't big in my part of the country. Another possibility is that even up here in frosty New England people at ranges, at least private ranges, are generally very generous about letting a fellow member handle a gun or even fire it, to get a feeling for how the gun fits and handles. At least that's true at the range I shoot at, with people I've come to recognize as regulars over the years.
 
Last edited:
Right you are, post edited.

In my view, the biggest difference between the 500/590, the Winchester1200/1300, and the Remington 870 lines is the position of the safety.
 
Madwell- This is exactly how I would do it. The combo you speak of is exactly what Im looking at. It runs $280 here.

JNewell- Thats true. However, we dont have a local shooting range. There isnt one for 100 miles in any direction. This means I wont know anyone and they wont know me. Also I have no idea what sort of atmosphere the place has and the type of people who frequent it so I would rather not have to count on that.
 
i own both mossberg(6 model 500 and 2 835s and a 935 wfs)
as well as the winchester 120 and 1300's
i perfer the winchesters and abuse my 500's(beatup in duck boats etc)
 
washambala, I too reside in Flagstaff. I also possess a 1300 defender. You are welcome to shoot it, just provide the ammo.

You know what's funny? I've owned an 870 wingmaster, 500, 870 Norinco clone and a Maverick in addition to the 1300. The damn Maverick was the smoothest and most comfortable of them all, though admittedly it was an older gun. The point is you're not going to go wrong with either one. Both are fine shotguns.

Every now and again our local Big 5 gets Hawk 982s. You can't beat them for the sale price. Mine is beastly.
 
In my view, the biggest difference between the 500/590, the Winchester1200/1300, and the Remington 870 lines is the position of the safety.

For the most part, I agree, and, though the location of the safety is not a deal-breaker or a deal-maker for me, it is an important consideration. I have owned many pump shotguns in my life, including a Winchester Model 97, an Ithaca Model 37, a Mossberg Model 835, a Marlin Model 120, a Smith & Wesson Model 3000, a Remington Model 870, a Smith & Wesson Model 916 (briefly!), a Benelli Nova, a Winchester Model 1300 and a Browning BPS and, with the exception of the Smith (aka Nobel) Model 916 :)barf:), I've liked them all in one way or another.
On pump shotguns, I prefer a tang-mounted safety over all other locations. If I can't have a safety located on the tang, I much prefer a cross-bolt safety mounted on the front of the trigger guard (ala Winchester Model 1300) to one mounted at the rear of the guard (as found on the Remington Model 870), the reason being I find it much more natural to move my index finger from the front (where I stow it in preparation for the flush of a bird) to the trigger, rather than having to move my finger to the rear of the guard and then forward to the trigger. It should be noted that I have rather large hands with long fingers and I'm therefore able to easily reach a front mounted safety. People with shorter fingers might well find the rear mounted cross-bolt safety easier to access.
Accordingly, the pumps that I currently own reflect said predilections: a Browning BPS with a tang mounted safety and a Winchester Model 1300 and a Benelli Nova with front-mounted crossbolt safeties.
Deciding between a Mossberg Model 500 and a Winchester Model 1300 may well come down to nothing more than where you want your safety positioned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top