Mossberg lever action .30-30: Why discontinued?

Google savage mod 99. Well built and accurate as were most pre 1970 firearms. They have increased significantly in price recently but are still around.
 
I owned by s Mossberg 464 Levergun .. Trapper , Brushgun it had a nickel type finish , 16.5 inch barrel .actually a great carbine … Im not sure why I traded it off .. some bad decision 🤣
 
I would probably buy one if I ran across it. Marlin and Henry are overpriced but I've bought them any way. I don't like Rossi's little toggle safety so I ain't buying one of thiers.
I read Rossi either needs work out of the box or would benefit greatly from work out of the box. I don't know if that is true or not.
 
All Winchesters? I know they moved production to Japan but don't know when they did that.
Well, I honestly haven't bought a "new" Winchester in quite a while , they may have improved. But if we're including .22lr levers, then Browning actually has the smoothest one I've ever used and a really short stroke too.
 
It hit the market in 2008.
Thanks for jogging my memory on that date. I recall seeing the advertising upon its introduction. I would have been taking a serious look at them if I hadn't already inherited a .30-30 Marlin lever gun from an uncle. Which backs up that previously mentioned theory that the market was already pretty saturated with Marlins & Winchesters and it can be difficult for a new competitor to break into an established market.
 
Ruger resurrected the Marlin name and took over the market.

How? I have yet to see a Ruger-made Marlin on the shelf. They are not producing the Marlin level quality and quantity that they were known for. Back when I bought my first Marlin, it was 300 bucks compared to the 1000 Henry. Now, Henrys are the cheaper rifle by comparison to the new Marlins. I do not see them being able to compete on the lever action market at the price point they sell at.

I really wish Mossberg was still in the market for levers. A laminated SS lever gun for the price of the old Marlins? Yes please. I have hunted them on Gunbroker only for them to go for thousands of dollars. Way over their original price. I like pretty lever guns a lot. But I like to have one I can beat up and never feel bad about.
 
They were actually made in a suprising number of calibres. Several were proprietary cartridges but they were also made in 243 308 356 and 30/30
Actually, .358win.

Not .356 Winchester, a rimmed version chambered in the Winchester M94 Angle Eject Big Bore, and a few in the Marlin M336.
 
My friend has one chambered in 30-30, shoots very well, he picked it up used when he was hunting a 22lr lever action when levers were cheap, $250 for both. We had a lever shoot recently and someone had a Savage 99 in 308 so I can say I've seen one. My first lever was purchased in the mid 70s for $99, a Marlin 35 with gold trigger, when they had rebates on them in the early 2000s, I bought a long barrel 45-70 for $300 minus the rebate, since then I found a big loop Winchester 30-30 and a Ted Williams 30-30 with a shorter barrel. I like shooting levers and feel I have to where a plaid shirt and wool hat when I pull them out. If I found one in 12ga I might look into another, maybe 44mag, 444. A good marketing maybe would be offer a pistol and lever in the same caliber so new buyers wouldn't have to search around.
 
I remember these - seems like they were only offered very briefly.
Mossberg 464.

I wasn't in the market so I didn't look at them very hard, but of course there was no shortage of people saying what it wasn't (Marlin/Win). Consequently it didn't last long.


I think, as others have alluded to, that they jumped the gun a little bit (pardon the pun). Probably would have been a lot more successful if offered maybe 2 or 3 years later; a lower price point wouldn't have hurt either. Of course this is incredibly easy to say in hindsight; nobody knows the future and the gun crowd can be a notoriously fickle and persnickety bunch.
 
So...

We're surprised - for some reason - when in a market which saw the demises of Winchester AND Marlin, two companies which are synonymous with "leveraction rifles," due to low market demand, also saw the demise of a Mossberg leveraction...?
As far as Marlin goes, I have to think Remington buying them out and quality going downhill had something to do with it. I don't know how much, though. The Remington made Marlins acquired the nick-name Remlins. During that era, the pre-Remington, used Marlins jumped up in price.

Was it the Marlin plant in CT that employees vandalized when they learned their company would be moved?
 
...I think, as others have alluded to, that they jumped the gun a little bit (pardon the pun). Probably would have been a lot more successful if offered maybe 2 or 3 years later; a lower price point wouldn't have hurt either. Of course this is incredibly easy to say in hindsight; nobody knows the future and the gun crowd can be a notoriously fickle and persnickety bunch.
I want to say they were priced slightly less than Marlin but I'm not sure.
 
Back
Top