Likely scenario is another depression, or terror attack.
I am going to go way out on a limb with the perfect firearm for SHTF.
.357 revolver (preparing for flames)
My rationale:
1) SHTF is not battlefield combat. No need for a 30-06. No need to shoot 400 yards.
2) If you need to run (literally, or figuratively) a revolver is half the weight of any rifle, and so is the ammo.
3) If you need to hunt, the .357 can, and has, taken any creature walking North america. One if my customers has taken several deer, past 100 yards! There is a post on this site of someone who took a Bison with a .357! It isn't hard to find stories online of rangers shooting Grizzlies with a .357 (not that I would recommend that) Or you can shoot rabbits without totally obliterating them.
4) Concealabilty. You can walk around stealthily, or overtly, carrying with ease! Do you want to hide it on your hip as to not alarm anyone? Or do you want to open carry as a deterent? It can always be at your hip, with no sling to fuss with.
Admittedly, it is not the perfect tool for any situation. It is sort of the "Swiss Army Knife" of weapons that will get the job done in most situation. I'm not saying you should trade in your AR's for a revolver.
BTW, the great Bill Jordon tells of a border patrolman named Sam Mckone, who had a fire fight with a contrabandista at 200 yards. The BG had a 30-30, Mckone had a .38 Special! With some well placed shots, Mckone won the fight! [Jordon, 1965]. I am not saying you should feel good about taking a pistol into battle, I am just supporting my theory.
I am going to go way out on a limb with the perfect firearm for SHTF.
.357 revolver (preparing for flames)
My rationale:
1) SHTF is not battlefield combat. No need for a 30-06. No need to shoot 400 yards.
2) If you need to run (literally, or figuratively) a revolver is half the weight of any rifle, and so is the ammo.
3) If you need to hunt, the .357 can, and has, taken any creature walking North america. One if my customers has taken several deer, past 100 yards! There is a post on this site of someone who took a Bison with a .357! It isn't hard to find stories online of rangers shooting Grizzlies with a .357 (not that I would recommend that) Or you can shoot rabbits without totally obliterating them.
4) Concealabilty. You can walk around stealthily, or overtly, carrying with ease! Do you want to hide it on your hip as to not alarm anyone? Or do you want to open carry as a deterent? It can always be at your hip, with no sling to fuss with.
Admittedly, it is not the perfect tool for any situation. It is sort of the "Swiss Army Knife" of weapons that will get the job done in most situation. I'm not saying you should trade in your AR's for a revolver.
BTW, the great Bill Jordon tells of a border patrolman named Sam Mckone, who had a fire fight with a contrabandista at 200 yards. The BG had a 30-30, Mckone had a .38 Special! With some well placed shots, Mckone won the fight! [Jordon, 1965]. I am not saying you should feel good about taking a pistol into battle, I am just supporting my theory.