Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Mounting a scope on a Marlin 336

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by sdra2007, Dec 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sdra2007

    sdra2007 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    36
    I just picked up a new Marlin 336 in 30-30 the other day and I'm looking to mount a scope on it. My question is, what height mounts do you guys who have 336's with scopes on them use? And do you take off the rear iron sight to get more clearance?

    I was looking at this scope base/rings:http://www.midwayusa.com/eproductpage.exe/showproduct?saleitemid=173325

    Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.


    And just for fun, here's a picture of my new rifle. :)

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2008
  2. 351 WINCHESTER

    351 WINCHESTER Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,050
    Mount it as low to the receiver if possible. This will probably require removal of the rear sight.
     
  3. MilsurpShooter

    MilsurpShooter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,541
    Location:
    Under a rock somewhere
    Even if you don't remove the rear sight definitely look into buying one of those hammer extenders. I've an old 336 in .35 Remington with a Weaver K3 scope on it. Without the hammer extender and with gloves on it makes it kind of tricky to drop the hammer.
     
  4. greyling22

    greyling22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,339
    Location:
    East Texas
    +1 on the hammer extender. I mounted my scope low low. but it is a fixed power job with a small lens.
     
  5. jhansman

    jhansman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    949
    Yes, removing the rear sight will give you a bit more clearance (taps out easily with a brass punch), and depending on the objective size of the scope you get, you may be able to get away with low rings. I had a Leupold 40mm on mine and it took mediums to clear the barrel.
     
  6. Asherdan

    Asherdan Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Messages:
    527
    Location:
    Hoss Country /USA
    I've used low rings with the 20mm objectives, medium with 32mm through 40mm. Last 4x32mm I had on didn't require removal of the rear sight.

    As others have said, get it as low as you can go and add the hammer extension if necessary.
     
  7. foghornl

    foghornl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,403
    My Marlin 30AW (same as 336, but came bundled w/sling) has a 4x32 in medium rings.
     
  8. Sulaco

    Sulaco Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I put a 1.75-3x20 in low rings on mine and it worked very well (with a hammer extender). I used a sight blank where the rear sight was but you can just as easily fold it down.
     
  9. TIMC

    TIMC Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,793
    Location:
    Texas
  10. rob b

    rob b Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2008
    Messages:
    30
    Location:
    Maryland
    I have these left over from my old 336 they are new
    they use leupold/burris style rings
    if you want them I could do $20 a set shipped
    I have 3 sets
     

    Attached Files:

  11. Nhsport

    Nhsport Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    581
    I know this is not what you are asking but.....



    Before you jump into the scope and all it intails consider a set of peep sights. You are actually mounting the new rear and ueing the existing front.
    A peep is much easier and more accurate than the open factory sights.
    The peep is a huge leap if your eyesight is not real good . The peep costs only slightly more than the rings would cost . The shape of the stock on a lever gun is perfect for the peep , not so good for the scope.
    Many of us consider peep sights to be "right" for a lever gun and a scope to be "funny looking"

    If you are set on an optic keep it as low as possible and forget about the "see thru" mounts, they are horrible to use and cause all sorts of problems
     
  12. SwampWolf

    SwampWolf Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,922
    Location:
    North Central Ohio
    I couldn't have said it better, Nhsport. Receiver sights (Williams or Lyman) and no stinking "see-thru" rings.
     
  13. avan47

    avan47 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Messages:
    134
    Location:
    Del Rio, TX
    Mine has a Weaver base and low rings. I use a Leupold 1-4 VX II, and it still has the rear sight. The Peep sight is a good idea if your eyes will still let you use iron sights. Mine don't. The scope is in the way when you carry the rifle at its balance point.
     
  14. woof

    woof Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,571
    Location:
    central Ohio
    Has anyone tried a red dot on a 336?
     
  15. jdh

    jdh Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    956
    woof,
    Yes, didn't like it and went back to open sights. Couldn't get a proper chek weld and see through the reddot.
     
  16. ECVMatt

    ECVMatt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,384
    Location:
    Yonder
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page