My Armalite AR-10 experience

Status
Not open for further replies.

ny32182

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2003
Messages
5,838
Location
Clemson, SC
Background: I've owned a number of factory and home build AR15's from bottom to top tier manufacturers and am very familiar with the AR15 platform in general. For quite a while I've wanted a reasonably priced but decent quality AR10 type rifle that was as close as possible in spec to a scaled up M4 clone carbine such as the Colt 6920. The lack of standardization in the .308 AR world always kind of put me off, but years ago, I came close to buying a 16" Armalite. The only thing that really kept me from it was the proprietary magazine, vs. everything else on the market. I recently discovered that they now make the AR-10A model, which uses the standard SR25 type magazine. I guess they have been doing that since 2013. Not sure how I missed it before, but within 24 hours of discovering that and getting some updates on the current AR10 product line, I bought a "Defender" model off Gunbroker, model DEF10. On paper it fits my vision for what I wanted as closely as anything I have ever been able to find. It appears to be a good solid, "mil spec-ish" (not really such a thing, but... again, my goal was scaled up 6920) rifle for a good price.

I picked it up a few days ago and here I will post all my thoughts on it and initial experiences with it.

///////////////////

Out of the box impressions:

1) I like it.
2) It feels.. well.. like the scaled up AR15 carbine I wanted.
3) I had read before that there might have been some issues with the finish on some rifles made many years ago, but not so here, the finish looks like a top notch milspec type finish throughout.
4) My only two "gripes" before taking it apart: Castle nut not staked, and the gas block is held in place by threaded screws. I knew the latter before I bought it, so that wasn't a surprise. I might look into gas block options in the future.

/////////////////////

Initial breakdown and cleaning:

1) ALMOST everything inside looks just as beautiful as it does outside.
2) Trigger group appears to be 100% AR15
3) Buffer tube is M16 milspec diameter, but longer than that of an AR15.
4) It has a standard H3 bufffer. The spring is longer and heavier due to the longer tube.
5) BCG is obviously massive compared to an AR15, but goes together identically. There is a small firing pin spring that is not present in an AR15. I assume since the firing pin is bigger, they figured it would be too dangerous if completely free floated, but that is speculation.
6) Carrier and gas key are chrome lined, as is the barrel. Gas key looks to have a good solid staking job.

OOPS:

And now the downside: The back end of the barrel, outside of the chamber, has some marks on it that look as if a tool of some sort hit it during manufacturing. They are deep, and the metal around the marks is raised. I have never seen anything like it on any AR15. I'm afraid they would cut into the front face of the bolt if I fired the gun. After a couple emails with Armalite, they agreed that the upper should come back to the factory, and it is on the way back shipping tomorrow. I assume replacing the barrel is the only option. Here is a picture of the marks:

20160609_091546.jpg

I know this sounds odd, but I'm actually undeterred about the overall quality as everything else appears beautifully constructed. Obviously I'll reserve final judgement until I get the upper back and shoot it, but I'm changing a bunch of stuff on the lower now for me as a lefty (I'll post pics) and everything is fitting great. Looking forward to shooting it.
 
So far I've installed the following AR15 spec parts with no issues:

-Seekins Ambi selector
-CTR milspec stock
-Magpul aluminum trigger guard
-MIAD 1.1 grip for AR15/AR10... fits great

Here are some comparison pics to a similar AR15 lower.

Both stocks are fully collapsed; you can see the difference in buffer tube length:

20160615_222116.jpg

20160615_222127.jpg

20rd mag in each:

20160615_222158.jpg

Here is a top view with key trigger components aligned next to each other.... you can see how the AR10 receiver extends both forward and back from the AR15 receiver.

20160615_223056.jpg
 
Did it leave you with temporary PTSD, a quivering pile of jelly on the floor? Was your shoulder broken? :D --sorry, just referencing that ridiculous "my AR15 experience' article from earlier this week :p

Nice rifle, sorry about the breechface --almost looks like a bolt-face embossed on there, doesn't it? Maybe the wrench/tool they use to torque on the extension, or something?

TCB
 
Definitely, it was very traumatizing....

It kind of looks like that at first glance, but the marks are not actually spaced out like the bolt lugs, and the lugs are flat, and these marks are skinny and deep... no way the bolt could have caused them.
 
You have a B model AR10. If the rifle was shooting well, all I saw were tool marks on the face of the barrel. I would have kept shooting it. But that's just me. The B model was the result of the 1994 Gun Ban that limited all new magazines to 10 rounds. The 20 round magazines were converted M-14 magazines. The last I knew, Armalite had plenty of the B model magazines in stock.

kwg
 
It is definitely an A model. Note the installed PMAG.

I did not fire it at all after receiving it, just cleaned the factory preservative off.
 
I bought an Armalite ar15, and the castle nut was not staked on it either. I didn't notice until after a couple range visits (I'm new to platform). Should I check torque on nut, then stake it ?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
 
It is definitely an A model. Note the installed PMAG.

I did not fire it at all after receiving it, just cleaned the factory preservative off.

You are correct. I read the part about "priority magazines' and didn't check the pictures.

My faux pa.

kwg
 
I bought an Armalite ar15, and the castle nut was not staked on it either. I didn't notice until after a couple range visits (I'm new to platform). Should I check torque on nut, then stake it ?

Personally I wouldn't worry about it unless it comes loose.
 
Another interesting thing I discovered is that the rear takedown pin detent comes in from the bottom rather than from the back. I guess they did this since coming in from the back would require a longer channel for the detent/spring than there is on the AR15. There is no reason this couldn't be done on a standard AR15 lower from what I can see:

20160615_192942.jpg
 
The upper was returned yesterday with a new barrel and bolt, and everything appears fine. Looking forward to shooting it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top