Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

My BMG in 3D!! (6 pictures)

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by TheArchDuke, May 1, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    The exclaimation points in the title made this thread sound more exciting than it is. This is one of the first models I have ever made. I haven't taken any classes yet so if any of you are into 3d modelling...be gentle.

    Also, as you can see from the pictures, I use the "personal learning edition" of Maya. Please excuse the huge watermarks.

    Anyway...



    Ma Deuce
    [​IMG]


    Frightening
    [​IMG]


    Full box of ammo. Ready to rock and roll!
    [​IMG]


    Wire-frame over shading so you can see the edges better
    [​IMG]


    side view
    [​IMG]


    Wireframe.
    [​IMG]



    As you can see from the last wireframe image, there's nothing inside. I wonder, does anyone have any links to images of the internal workings of the Browning Machine Gun? It might be fun to model and animate all of those moving parts. Maybe when I get more experience in Maya.


    Anyway, tell me what you think!
     
  2. EAWOK

    EAWOK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    10
    That is pretty cool.
     
  3. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    Thanks a lot
     
  4. garrett1955

    garrett1955 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    some where in america... (Wis.)
    Be proud of that. did you teach yourself how to use maya??

    looks good man!

    I will look for internal structure for you!

    keep up the good work man!

    I love to look and cad work, and what not.
     
  5. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    Yeah I've taught myself what little I know. And there's a lot more that I DO know but can't actually do.

    Based on my talks with my future 3D teacher (current web teacher) I'm doing almost everything wrong. The way I model is inefficient I guess. Can't wait to re-learn it the right way.


    Thanks for the kind words!

    Do you know maya at all?
     
  6. garrett1955

    garrett1955 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    some where in america... (Wis.)
    I know, well knew how to use Auto CAD. I used it for a semester in H.S.
    Now that I have my first year of college in I will be taking an Engineering Graphics, and Mechanics class. kind of to test the waters to see if I want to keep going in that direction. I have no major picked yet.

    but when we used Auto CAD in H.S. we did a lot of 2D, and some simple 3D. like gears, and pullys, they did look nice though!
     
  7. garrett1955

    garrett1955 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    some where in america... (Wis.)
  8. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    Wow those are better than the pictures i found. Thanks a lot!


    This is going to be tedious! :what: haha
     
  9. Owen

    Owen Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,958
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    garret,

    Sounds like you HS was a little behind the times.

    Current practice is to do the models first, and the saftware generates the 2d views on it's own, often dropping and arranging the dimensions on the sheet.

    The current major packages for engineering are Pro/E and SolidWorks.

    Maya is an artistic package, and not an engineering package, correct?
     
  10. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    Yeah it's for artists. I don't know if people use it for engineering design as well though. It seems a little over-powered for that. Why would engineers need realistic hair physics and mentalRay?

    The engineering aspect of 3D isn't anything I really thought about until this thread. It's very interesting. I'm going to have to look into it some more.
     
  11. Owen

    Owen Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,958
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    Actually it's probably underpowered for engineering.

    err, how about wrongly powered.

    It probably doesn't have a detailing module (for making blueprints), a PDM package, export to FEA packages, and so on.
     
  12. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    Yeah the physics engine probably couldn't handle all of those little collisions. But man it would LOOK great! haha.
     
  13. Justin

    Justin Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,285
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    Man, this brings back memories...

    Maya's a good program, but I wouldn't use it to do engineering type stuff. Better off to use Pro/Engineer or Solidworks for that stuff.
     
  14. Owen

    Owen Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,958
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    If you like 3d modeling, and can wrap your head around PDM systems, and can suffer through detailing drawings, there is all kinds of work out there.
     
  15. TheArchDuke

    TheArchDuke Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    511
    Location:
    San Diego
    Well I'm in school right now working on my bachelor's degree in graphic design and multimedia. But I'm going to look into the engineering aspect 3D too. Mechanical things facinate me. That's a big reason why I got into guns.
     
  16. CatsDieNow

    CatsDieNow Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    353
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    I did a double major in computer graphics and mechanical engineering technology. I was intending to go into animation, but that whole 9/11 recession thing made me very glad I did the engineering portion of it.

    The big three CAD packages are Pro/E, CATIA, and NX (what used to be Unigraphics). Solid Works is a medium capability package, but a good one. AutoCAD doesn't get nearly as much play as it used to with the feature-based modeling packages availible now, however, I think Autodesk bought Alias so they should integrate nicer. (Meaning you could use AutoCAD to do the modeling and then import into Maya).

    Maya does get used in the engineering design world especially by those who do industrial design and styling. Although the CAD packages are catching up quickly, nothing does fluid, organic shapes better than "artistic" software.

    Oh, and beware of teachers who are telling you that you did everything wrong. (Ask Justin about one DR Short and see if he can keep his language up to THR standards :p ).
     
  17. thumper723

    thumper723 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Messages:
    391
    Location:
    Lost somewhere in time!
    What happened to SDRC I-DEAS? When I worked for a Ford Supplier, we had to use it natively.

    Also GMI Engineering & Management Institute (nka Kettering University) used it in the Engineering Curriculum.
     
  18. CatsDieNow

    CatsDieNow Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    353
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX
    I believe SDRC is now part of UGS (NX) since about 2000.

    Most big prime contractors (such as the one I work for) will require their suppliers to use their particular flavor of CAD software - it saves a huge headache for us if we don't have to worry about data translation. Well, actually, it merely minimizes it...never goes away completely.
     
  19. Owen

    Owen Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,958
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    I used SDRC in College. I think, like Catia, it is used heavily in certain industries, and it isn't used at all outside of that industry.

    AutoCAD still owns the architectural market.
     
  20. Labinnac

    Labinnac Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    121
    Location:
    Earth
    When Owen was talking about detailing engineering drawings I bet he was thinking of me. I've used Pro/E exclusively since 1996. I learned to use it back in college. I've been cursed ever since...

    I've played with Maya & 3DS Max and found both pretty cumbersome to learn on my own. I started playing with Zbrush not too long ago and I think that is a far easier program to use.
     
  21. Owen

    Owen Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    5,958
    Location:
    Georgetown, TX
    Labinnac,

    You say that like I have never been chained to a desk for 8 months, trying to figure out if I can use the magic note, or not.

    You know that's not true. Heck, you know that's why I'm not there anymore.
     
  22. Labinnac

    Labinnac Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    Messages:
    121
    Location:
    Earth
    On the contrary, I know that you know.

    Your suffering has ended. :)

    Mine lingers on. :(

    Don't let either of us discourage you. Like any job it has ups and downs. For the most part it is on the upside though. :D
     
  23. CypherNinja

    CypherNinja Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2005
    Messages:
    811
    Location:
    Willoughby, Ohio
  24. garrett1955

    garrett1955 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    some where in america... (Wis.)
    owen

    I did not know you are to draw it in 3D first??

    I guess that how our teacher tought us...

    oh well it was for the experience I guess.

    I also thought Maya was more for artists and what not.

    I know at the university level they teach a lot of solid works, but Auto CAD is still a huge part of what they teach.

    IDK what kind of engineering I would like to get into. I love mechanical things. how stuff works, Improving, and inventing.

    my options are endless. lol
     
  25. BHPshooter

    BHPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,451
    Location:
    Utah
    That's very nice!

    One suggestion -- the ammo box looks like a .30-cal box, the M2 (as you know) is .50-cal, and feeds from a bigger ammo can.

    I sure wish I knew how to do that kind of stuff...

    Wes
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page