mgregg85
Member
so school buses are as bad as airlines now?
Pathetic. I'm looking forward to having kids, except for crap like this.
mpmarty: That's the way it works now. The one who actually throws a punch, regardless of the circumstances, is the one who's going to be in more trouble.
Folks, it might be a mistake to paint all public schools/administrators/school boards with the same broad brush.
Several people warned you not to expect to find a rational administrator. Apparently you chose not to believe them. It has been discussed on this forum numerous times in the past that merely uttering the 'G' word is often now cause for detention, suspension, or even expulsion ... despite the old nursery school rhyme that "words can never hurt me."Intune said:She did call me back in about five mins with the name & number. I am sitting here in utter disbelief & fuming. I want to get the exact story (from my son’s perspective) this afternoon.
Also focus on WHO created whatever "disruption" there was. Your son was not arguing with the bus driver, he was engaged in a private discussion (in a public place) with a friend. He could not, by definition, be "arguing" with the bus driver when he was not addressing her.Joe Demko said:Concentrate on whether there was actually a disruption that threatened the safety of the passengers, not the first or second ammendments.
Several people warned you not to expect to find a rational administrator. Apparently you chose not to believe them. It has been discussed on this forum numerous times in the past that merely uttering the 'G' word is often now cause for detention, suspension, or even expulsion ... despite the old nursery school rhyme that "words can never hurt me."
Remember -- bullets don't kill. The 'G' word does.
You are correct, but that's what they are designed and intended to do, for reasons as stated by Joe Demko. That's not the problem. The problem is that educational administrators have increasingly adopted policies of zero tolerance for actions which are not inherently intolerable.cyclist said:Zero tolerance policies remove any consideration of circumstances, any discretion, any point of incident judgement.
I’m right there with ya AB.I don't necessesarily agree with it, but I can accept a degeree of logic for zero tolerance of firearms in the possession of students on school property. But when zero tolerance for firearms is expanded to include zero tolerance for pictures of firearms, or the use of words connoting firearms, then the policy is flawed.
Students were asked to stop having conversations about guns.
Maybe you don't know enough public schools. I can assure you that your broad statement does not apply to every school and every situation. I am an elected school board member and former board president. Good, well written policies are useful, not gospel. There are still reasonable people in administration and on school boards who will consider all aspects of an issue and act reasonably. You're probably more likely to find them in the rural heartland than the urban districts.In all honesty, every public school I know of has no-tolerance policies and the administrators always stand behind them regardless of the circumstances or how stupid the offense.
Below are the consequences for receiving a bus incident report.
1. Verbal/Written Warning
2. Write bus rules
3. Suspension from bus
Take comfort in these two words: Home Schooling.
I've been a public school teacher for 34 years, and there's no way I'd place my kids in government schools. Today as I left school, two 6th grade girls were in the office, bruised and bleeding, after being attacked by a group of older girls.
both of them are still teaching and complaining they do not get paid enough-$55,000 a year each. And these are the people we have teaching our kids and they are highly regarded as wonderful teachers.