Craig, I most certainly respect your thoughts on the matter, I've read a good many of you posts throughout the years. The practical side of the article for me, and I'll qualify myself as a hunter first, plinker second, was the attention paid to the chamber and first several inches of barrel ahead of it. All else equal, I feel keeping this portion clean and free of build-up that can accelerate pitting makes great sense.
What I might point out is that my cleaning routine at the range amounts to a .17 cal long pistol rod with coupler and .22 cal nylon brush (stiff black brush) inserted from the breech and run in/out a dozen times or so. From there, a .17 cal rifle rod, coupler and .22 cal brush run 2 or 3 times the length of the barrel followed by a pair of dry patches to push out the gunk.
I save true cleaning for the end of a session which adds JB Bore Shine (not paste) followed by a dry patch and then, depending on the rifle, 10-20 rounds of my intended ammo to re-lube the barrel. It does take a bit longer and won't gain much if any accuracy, my purpose is seeking to preserve the current accuracy and consistency. I agree the BR shooters are a whole other breed of obsessed (sorry guys) that I don't fully understand.
300 rounds of soft lead .22lr bullets won't do anything to smooth out the bore of a .22 rifle.
I agree completely. Too soft and too slow. The smoother the barrel from the manufacturer, the less likelihood that lead and other material will stick. Does that mean we should all lap cheap .22 factory barrels? Not necessarily. A barrel can be accurate while still being rough but when it will be accurate; from the standpoint of round count, can vary widely. Lapping not done by an expert may actually reduce accuracy as true lapped barrels are first lapped then cut to length, then chambered and crowned. Unless a barrel is truly hideous and accuracy is poor from the start I wouldn't suggest attempting to lap more than a few strokes if at all.