Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Need some Good ole' 1911 advice.

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Greg8098, Dec 30, 2007.

?

Which would you buy. Cost being equal.

Poll closed Jun 27, 2008.
  1. Springfield Loaded ( stainless )

    54 vote(s)
    77.1%
  2. Kimber Stainless II

    16 vote(s)
    22.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Greg8098

    Greg8098 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    300
    Location:
    Bossier City, Louisiana
    I know this topic has probably been beat to death, but I need to decide on which 1911 style pistol that I will buy for the new year. I have narrowed my choices down to the stainless Springfield Loaded and the Kimber Stainless II . Both cost about the same in my area give or take a few dollars. I have heard some bad things about Kimber, but I know that the internet has a tendency to exaggerate things sometimes. Need some good advice from people with actual experience. Once again thanks.
     
  2. AndyC

    AndyC Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,581
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Springfield > Kimber ;)
     
  3. sturmgewehr

    sturmgewehr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    932
    Location:
    Indiana
    There are at least 100 reasons to avoid current Kimbers. You would be far ahead of the game if you went with a Springfield. I would suggest you look at the TRP or Operator models.
     
  4. steelyblue

    steelyblue Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Messages:
    527
    Location:
    Rio Grande Valley, Texas
    Most everyone that I know in the real world (friends and people at ranges) like Kimber better. This forum surprises me by all the anti Kimber rhetoric. I know a lot of law enforcement officers and avid shooters with 30+ yrs of experience that like Kimber. I have nothing but good things to say about Kimber, but I have had an SA Champion, a Milspec, and a fullsize loaded model that had issues. All issues were taken care of and the guns were sold. I will never buy another SA.
     
  5. hondapro

    hondapro Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    11
    I just got a loaded springfield (PX9151LP) and Iam very pleased.
     
  6. sturmgewehr

    sturmgewehr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    932
    Location:
    Indiana
    It's not just this forum, it's pretty much universal. Kimber's quality is suffering as of late.

    When the top 1911 gun smiths like Yam, Vickers, Hackthorn and Lau all agree and say that Kimbers quality stinks, you have to listen. These guys are the top authorities on 1911's.

    Read the link supplied then come back and dispute the pictures and quotes form the top smiths.
     
  7. Grizzly Adams

    Grizzly Adams Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    576
    Location:
    Central Alabama
    Go with the Springfield!
     
  8. bearmgc

    bearmgc Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,057
    I wouldn't give up my Springer Loaded for anything, its that good.
     
  9. txgolfer45

    txgolfer45 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Texas
    I think you will find that the older Kimbers were awesome handguns. The II version isn't looked upon as favorably.

    Therefore, the sentiment that the Springfield is a better choice as the Kimber I's are harder to find.
     
  10. MarshallDodge

    MarshallDodge Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,287
    Location:
    Utah, USA
    I have a Kimber Custom Target, a Gold Match, a Springfield Champion and a Loaded model. My Kimbers are the older pre series II models.

    Pros and Cons:

    I paid more for the Kimbers.

    The fit and finish on the Kimbers is better than the Springfields.

    The Kimbers are more accurate than the Springfields. I think this is because of two reasons. 1.The trigger on the Kimber is lighter but this is no longer the case with the new series II guns. 2.The barrel fit is better on the Kimber.

    Both have been very reliable.

    Springfields come with Novak sights. I really like Novak sights. :D

    That being said, my next 1911 will not be from either company. I am currently looking at STI or building my own on a Caspian.
     
  11. Ken Rainey

    Ken Rainey Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    590
    Location:
    MS
    It seems that when Kimber went to the series II pistols that trouble just followed - mostly due to trying the external extractors - but also some instances with the new safety system. They went back to internal extractors and solved those issues even though some of them ran fine, mostly the full size models. The new safety system just incorporates more parts and procedure to deal with - just more things that "could" go wrong or cause issues in most peoples books. Most 1911 fans just prefer the pistol without the firing pin safety systems added, me included, even though I've never had a problem caused by them.

    I prefer the pre series II pistols. Kimber makes some models without the new safety system and these are the ones I would look at if wanting to purchase a new 1911 style pistol between the two companies that you are considering.....OR, you could always just watch the internet gun sales and find a pre series II model! ;)
     
  12. steelyblue

    steelyblue Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2007
    Messages:
    527
    Location:
    Rio Grande Valley, Texas
    Sturmgewehr, I did not dispute crap! If you could read the post before you quote it, I was simply giving my own opinion and experience. I have read many of the posts on this site discribing Kimber shortcomings and they seem valid enough. The guy that started the thread was asking for real world experience and I gave mine.
     
  13. sturmgewehr

    sturmgewehr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    932
    Location:
    Indiana
    I think you need to look up the definition of "rhetoric".

    Your choice of words does in fact suggest you are disputing the comments made by myself and others about Kimber. You posted this after my post which implies that my comments were less than accurate or somehow exaggerated for the purpose of deceiving the OP.

    Don't get mad at me because you choose your words poorly.
     
  14. Big Boomer

    Big Boomer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,052
    Location:
    Texas
  15. wditto

    wditto Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    513
    Location:
    DFW
    he had four that had problems but he likes them ?
     
  16. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    i say get the sa. i am kinda partial to them i own 3 sa handguns one being a 1911 i have never been disappointed with them, plus they are backed by the best customer service you could imagine. i have the mc operator and i love it, i couldn't be happier. plus with all the issues that i have heard and read about in regards to the kimbers, from reputable sources i would stay away from them until they get things sorted out.
     
  17. Zach S

    Zach S Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,515
    Location:
    Western NC/East TN
    I read through page 4 of the link posted above, and I'm happy that all my kimbers were made before they came with the "II" stamped into the slide...

    And the most I paid for any kimber was $650, maybe $675 for a compact. I paid $500 for my carry gun:D

    I have limited expeirance with the series II guns, most of that being with three, two with broken slide stops (replaced with chip parts), and one with a broken safety (that was sent back to kimber). So I wouldnt reccomend one. These werent my pistols, they belonged to shooters at the range I frequent.

    Every series I've fired was a dream to shoot, the four I own have several thousand trouble-free rounds through them, one with 10k+.

    If you see a used series I pistol on the shelf, I'd reccomend it. If not, I'd reccomend the SA loaded.
     
  18. Zach S

    Zach S Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,515
    Location:
    Western NC/East TN
    Oh, this reminds me of a phone conversation I heard a while back, forgot all about it till now:

    "Hi Dennis, this is Jeff."
    "From On Target?"
     
  19. chakup

    chakup Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2005
    Messages:
    122
    Location:
    Eugene, OR
    I'd go Springfield over Kimber anyday.
     
  20. Dobe

    Dobe member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,583
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    If you could find a pre Series II, I'd say go with Kimber over the SA, if not then go with the SA.
     
  21. Geno

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,847
    They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well, here is the equivalent of 14,000 words then. See the 14 pictures in post #27, my not-so-"Pro" "Custom" Shop Kimber:

    http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=275388&highlight=Kimber+Quality

    Dennis, from Kimber's "Custom" Shop packaged it back up, and sent it right back to me stating it was within spec. :barf:
     
  22. biscuitninja

    biscuitninja Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    353
    Wow Doc....
    that is some pretty compelling evidence. Just sending that to the BBB would completely screw with Kimber. I believe that other small custom shops will be able to pick up the slack. Too bad though, Kimber has some very pretty pistols. But if they don't work well... you know what they say about Italian sports cars...
    -bix
     
  23. weisse52

    weisse52 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,341
    Location:
    Bountiful, Utah
    Which would you buy. Cost being equal.......

    Colt...then the SA
     
  24. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I prefer the Springfield. If you're like alot of gun owners, you'll eventually want to personalize your pistol. From what I've found, Kimber has some proprietary parts (like the sights) that aren't totally compatible w/ all other aftermarket 1911 parts makers.
    I'd go w/ models above the Loaded tho, becasue they are made in the USA ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page