Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Need some legal info

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Warren, Sep 17, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Warren

    Warren Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,454
    Location:
    Northern California
    Inexplicably The Wife received a photo of a pair of politicians running for POTUS and VPOTUS in the mail.

    If she allows me too I'll take the photo and put some holes in it, in a safe manner of course.

    What I was wondering is it still legal to use pictures of people as a target?

    I know there was some controversy when someone used a picture of Hitler as a target. So I need to know what the law on that sort of thing is.


    Thank you,

    H2L
     
  2. Graystar

    Graystar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,756
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Depends on the state. In Mass...no. Dunno about cali. The guys at the range should know.
     
  3. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    I would advise you not to shoot up the pictures - especially at a public range. Someone could get the idea that you were threatening the candidates in question, and the next thing you’d know the Secret Service would be hammering on your door. What happened after that could be big trouble. Shooting at printed targets that depict universally despised individuals such as Hitler is O.K.
     
  4. Chipperman

    Chipperman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,572
    Location:
    Essex Co, MA
    It is perfectly legal for individuals to shoot pictures of people in MA. This is a law that is often misunderstood.

    The law actually says that MA Gun Clubs that have their own FFL cannot allow shooting of targets that resemble human forms. There are only a few Gun Clubs in MA that have their own FFL's, so the law does not affect very many people.
     
  5. answerguy

    answerguy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    881
    Location:
    Bay City Michigan
    I don't think it helps your candidate win an election to have someone shooting up a photo of his opponent. Makes us all look bad.
     
  6. geekWithA.45

    geekWithA.45 Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,040
    Location:
    SouthEast PA
    You mean the candidate in question doesn't fit this category? :neener:
     
  7. Warren

    Warren Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,454
    Location:
    Northern California
    Just to be safe I won't put holes in it in public.
     
  8. joab

    joab Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,830
    Location:
    Ocoee, Fla
    As far as I know, Im pretty sure I read it somewhere, but I may be wrong. Cali does not allow targets depicting humans
    Your pic could very well get you into a whole lot of trouble especially if the RO disagrees with your political views
     
  9. Stebalo

    Stebalo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    312
    Location:
    Texas
    Many ranges specifically ban political targets. There are stories floating around of secret service agents making visits at ranges after such activity occured. They don't take it lightly. I wouldn't do it. Use it as a dart board at home.
     
  10. Mark in California

    Mark in California Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2004
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Eureka, CA
    Federal law does not allow you to shoot at pictures or otherwise anyone under the protection of the Secret Service. I know for a fact the Secret Service would not be amused, and would consider you as a threat. If reported, you can expect a visit from a Secret Service Agent, with a warrent for your arreast. I have seen Secret Service Agents show up to investigate someone for threatening the wife of the President, and the Federal Code removes all privacy protections (State and Federal) from anyone who would in any way threaten the President, Vice President, their families, and anyone running for the above jobs who has Secret Service protection.
     
  11. Waitone

    Waitone Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,406
    Location:
    The Land of Broccoli and Fingernails
    Not that I disagree with the idea of not using images of politicians for target practice. SS has a really tough job and there are far too many nutcases out there. I think it entirely justified to ban shooting at images.

    That said, in the good ol' days it was images of a diety that was banned.

    Interesting that we have move from baning images of diety to banning the abuse of images of politicians.

    I wonder if maybe some kind of psychological transferrence just took place.
     
  12. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
    Probably not.

    Biblically, it was worshipping of "graven" images that was proscribed. I suspect most politicians and candidates would be only to happy to have their images worshipped, and I doubt the Secret Service would have a problem with it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page