Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New 7.62x40 WT - .223 necked up to .308

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by bds, Aug 24, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bds

    bds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,680
    Location:
    Northwest Coast
    In September issue of Shooting Illustrated, they discuss Wilson Combat's new 7.62x40 cartridge that's essentially .223 necked up to .308.

    Primary benefit is the need to only change your AR barrel and magazine while being able to use all other existing components.

    125 gr bullet out of 16" barrel produces 2400 fps.

    Any thoughts and/or comparison to 6.8 SPC shot from same 16" barrel?.

    Article also hinted heavier bullet loads for suppressed fire application ...
     
  2. Michael R.

    Michael R. Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    290
    Location:
    the people's republic of illinois
    i do not own a rifle in 6.8 but here are my thoughts. in my reloading manual, the maximum velocity for the 6.8 spc with a 115 grain bthp is 2579 fps. but with a 125 grain bullet i would feel that the 7.62x40 wt would be a little faster than the 6.8 spc.
     
  3. Michael R.

    Michael R. Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    290
    Location:
    the people's republic of illinois
    also, those figures were taken from a 24 inch barrel, confirming that the 7.62x40 is superior to the 6.8
     
  4. 68wj

    68wj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,654
    Location:
    Upstate
    It's a good option is you want to keep your 5.56 mags and bolt. Fired 5.56 brass is common but has to be formed and .30 cal bullets are plentifull.

    Performance from Wilson Combat's own ammo:
    7.62x40 WT
    110 gr. Sierra HP, 2425 FPS - 16" Barrel
    110 gr. Sierra HP, 2525 FPS - 18" Barrel
    125 gr. Nosler Ballistic Tip, 2350 FPS - 16" Barrel
    125 gr. Speer TNT, 2400 FPS - 16" Barrel

    6.8 SPC
    95 gr. Barnes TTSX, 2850 FPS - 16" Barrel
    110 gr. Hornady BTHP, 2700 FPS - 16" Barrel
    110 gr. Barnes TSX, 2700 FPS - 16" Barrel
     
  5. Breakmyfootoff

    Breakmyfootoff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    107
    How does this compare to 300 aac blackout? It sounds really similar.
     
  6. 1stmarine

    1stmarine Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,599
    Location:
    On the road again
    For the best possible ballistics with the same bolt look at the 6x45.
    The best bullets translate to flatter shooting and more energy at all ranges.
    The only advantage I see with the blackout and wisper is the subsonic option with 220gr bullets. Can also do with the AK round.
    shoot often, shoot safe.
     
  7. Pigoutultra

    Pigoutultra Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    Near Fort Dix, NJ
    Are you referring to the wildcat, or the 6x45 Kimber?
     
  8. 1stmarine

    1stmarine Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,599
    Location:
    On the road again
    6x45 offspring of the .223 rem. basically the .223 rem necked up to 6mm.
    Last weekend I got....
    90gr SMKFMJ ... 2780fps.
    87 Hornady Amax.... 2792fps
    100gr SGK....2675fps.

    Cannot do more at the moment, anyway to be honest, I am already very happy but I am still researching with a new barrel and ball powders. I am also building an ACC blackout for subsonic mainly and will compare with the 7.62x39 also subsonic.

    I am documenting here and will start another one for the ACC as soon as I can get to it, in case anyone is interested...
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=564287
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2011
  9. sixgunner455

    sixgunner455 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,912
    1stmarine, did you have a typo on that 100gr 6mmx45 load? It looks like you went from just under 2800 fps for the 87 and 90 gr loads to just over 1600 fps for the 100 gr.
     
  10. 1stmarine

    1stmarine Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,599
    Location:
    On the road again
    yes it is 2.6K sorry that! and Thanks!

    Also I forgot I have two new barrels. One arrived today and one on its way... I am going to try 24" with superformance powder and a lower Rate of twist.
    Sorry to the OP I don't mean to hijack this thread so anyone with interest in .223 offsprings any learning's I am sharing the best I can as time allows.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2011
  11. Zak Smith

    Zak Smith Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,037
    Location:
    Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    Anything in .30 caliber based on the .223 case and limited to AR-15 magazine COAL will be substantially identical to .300 Fireball, .300 Whisper, .300 Blackout.
     
  12. 1stmarine

    1stmarine Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,599
    Location:
    On the road again
    That is what I think. Even with the VLD magazines that allow a substantial increase in COAL you will be limited by chamber specs and the design of the case itself that needs a good portion of the massive bullet (For AR-15 I mean) to be properly seated to assure good tension. Not much meat on the brass there.
    So, like always, we go up but gravity pull us back where we were before.
    Simple physics.
     
  13. gotzero

    gotzero Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    42
    The Wilson round needs new magazines I believe.

    The shorter rounds make a little more sense to me. Use the stock mags, create the .300 necks from the wider part of the brass, great subsonic performance, etc. I do not have one but I decided to get a barrel, it would be nice to replace as little as possible.

    The disingenuous comparisons from mfg's are getting very old. No one is going to use lower velocity rounds out of 24" barrels...
     
  14. sansone

    sansone Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,173
    Location:
    north florida USA
    this makes perfect sense to me. I play with loads for .243 anyhow and putting a 90gr pill on top a .223 case just seems "right"
     
  15. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,454
    Location:
    SW MO
    The affect of increasing bullet diameter in the same case allows the base to be exposed to more pressure. That increases the amount of kinetic energy it "absorbs" and puts more power downrange. It also expends it more quickly because of more frontal area and potentially less efficient shape. The heavier bullet is also affected by drop to more significant degree, delivering less effective range. Friction and gravity overcome it earlier.

    There is no "superior" in choosing the ballistics of a bullet - you pick the one that dynamically meets the taskings for that job, in range, impact, penetration, etc. Given equal barrel lengths and bullet weights, the .30x.223 will generally have less range and more power than 6.8SSPC, and that cartridge will generally have less range and more power than 6.5G. That is a generalization, it will get picked to death by fanboys, but the harsh reality is that when you baseline performance factors like barrel, weight, and OAL of the cartridge, you get that.

    Whatever, understand what the cartridges OPTIMUM application is, and don't make more of it than it is. It can either do the job well, or just do the job - nothing morally wrong with middle of the pack performance - but it CANNOT be the answer to all applications. It WILL run short at one end or the other of it's power curve, and another cartridge exists to easily better it.

    Go fanbois all over it and claim "superiority," and a true appreciation of what it can really do will get buried in a rising tide of nitpicking. No cartridge is "superior," it just has more power or speed at a certain time in it's flight, and might offer some advantages in logistic outside it's ballistic envelope. Performance is purchased in dollars, what one shooter decides for himself is his business.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2011
  16. Pigoutultra

    Pigoutultra Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    Near Fort Dix, NJ
    I do like the idea for this cartridge, but it has been done before. Not much new here 'cept for a new name.
    That being said, I like it when companies try to reinvent the wheel, so to speak, they just might make it better.
     
  17. bds

    bds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,680
    Location:
    Northwest Coast
    Well, I have a 20" Bushmaster HBAR and 16" .308 Saiga. Happy with both in accuracy (1-1.5" @ 100 yds).

    I thought about 7.62x39 or 6.8 SPC 16" upper and saw the 7.62x40 WT article.

    Looks like it's a No-Go and I prefer to have a complete upper that I can swap out.

    Thanks for the comments!
     
  18. helotaxi

    helotaxi Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,218
    The 7.62WT is different than the .300AAC and the Whisper. The case is longer and has a higher capacity. It was designed to perform better than the other two with supersonic loads using lighter, shorter bullets. The Blackout and Whisper were designed primarily with subsonic performance in mind.

    Wilson does use a modified magazine for their round. They are Lancer or Tangodown (don't remember which) with the internal ribs ground down. The ribs in normal AR mags intrude too far into the mag body for the .30 cal bullets to stack correctly. The solution with the Blackout and Whisper is to seat the bullet a bit deeper, but the longer case of the WT eliminates that option.
     
  19. dom1104

    dom1104 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,366
    in my mind...

    the WT round is for making major in USPSA.

    The Blackout is for general use / suppressors.

    Special mags are the downfall of the WT round.
     
  20. bds

    bds Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    13,680
    Location:
    Northwest Coast
    I may consider shooting 3 gun in the future with a 16" upper. What is the general consensus among 3 gun shooters?

    Thanks.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2011
  21. kentucky_smith

    kentucky_smith Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,686
    I use plain GI 20 rounders just fine at full capacity. 30 rounders can't quite get that many in there.
     
  22. CMC

    CMC Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    224
    Location:
    Florida
    If you are buying a complete upper and only looking at 100 yards I myself like the 30 remington AR , It requires a new magazine and it is a single stack.
    Mine is very accurate even with factory loads and if you reload you can load the Sierra 135 BTHP for fun and you can load it to about 2550 fps from a 22 in barrel.
    For hunting I use the Nosler 150 gr ballistic tip and it does have some punch.
    Here is a link on an NRA article on reloading the cartridge.
    http://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/handloading-30-remington-ar/

    Good luck
     
  23. GunTech

    GunTech Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,878
    Location:
    Helena MT
    Another solution to a non-existant problem.
     
  24. helotaxi

    helotaxi Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,218
    All problems were solved back in the late 1800's. There have been hundreds if not thousands of cartridges designed since then that were solutions to non-existent problems.

    Reality is that it fills a very small specific niche. Not a problem, but a narrowly defined desire. Of course I personally consider unfulfilled desires a problem but maybe that's me. This one isn't my particular desire, but apparently it was for someone.
     
  25. Tirod

    Tirod Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,454
    Location:
    SW MO
    If you want to hunt with an AR, and 5.56 is illegal in your state, big problem. You have no choice but an alternate caliber. This could solve the problem, and Wilson has done sufficient research to expect a profit can be made.

    Magazines are caliber, action, even brand specific. Most aren't interchangeable between different pistols, or rifle to rifle. It's just the unique nature of the AR that makes shooter require it - and if it's not 5.56, a different mag is no big deal. Experienced gun owners know that is part and parcel to the whole hobby.

    There was a time when almost no American owned a .30 gun, and there will be a time when most won't. It's base diameter is on the extreme large end of working intermediate calibers - the US hasn't ever used it for that except the M1 Carbine, and that's a stretch. In foreign use, the caliber is noted for mediocre performance - it's largely an addiction to tradition, not ballistics, that keeps it popping up in new cartridges.

    Reducing the base diameter makes for a more aerodynamic bullet - I see the under 7mm as having the sweet spot in ballistic performance in the AR mag length. The .308 lost the fight keeping it's place in assault rifle use, most cartridges were just too powerful for what was needed. Now it's time to accept that the .30 is just too large a bullet in the AR.

    It doesn't mean somebody can't sell a few while the public takes it's sweet time figuring it out.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page