New Ad From The Brady Campaign

Status
Not open for further replies.
nooooo don't take my assault clips!!!!! oh wait, I don't have any, nevermind

It's bad when we have to be able translate "anti" grammar to defend our rights....

I would figure that if they were going to try to ban something they would at least make the effort to understand what they are against....but I guess there really is no hope...
 
I'm scared to go home with my extended mag...er, uh evil assault clips just lying there, waiting to slay me ruthlessly...

That's why it is important to keep them locked up in a safe when you are not using them.
 
I have no problem banning assault clips. I didn't see any in the video, but whatever. Though I will urge the president to take care of more pressing items ATM. But ban them later.
 
I love how these hacks are on the forefront of trying to change our language and thereby directing the narrative. Rush talks alot on how the left renames things in order to change/charge emotions. This is their M.O.

Whats next? "Tell president Obama to ban 'murder sticks', 'genocide gear'?"

Im surprised they didnt use a Hello Kitty pink AR15 with a Beta mag.
 
[/Facepalm]

If they want to be taken seriously, they need to at least use real words and phrases. :rolleyes:

So I suppose chalk one up for us! :)
 
If they want to be taken seriously, they need to at least use real words and phrases.

Their point isn't to be taken seriously by anyone that knows, their point is to get the emotional, illogical masses and the ignorant soccer moms with nothing else to do making noise.

Flagged as spam.. (fraudulent)

Oh heck yes. :D

Added my flag.
 
Funny thing is, I can empty a 32 round magazine a heck of lot faster than 16 seconds. I guess if they knew that, they'd really be freaking out.


-Matt
 
Maybe they use the word "clips" because if they used the word "magazines" people might think they were trying to abolish publications.

The target with the little girl reminded me of the scene in Men in Black when Jay shoots the little girl target instead of the alien targets because she is the greatest threat.
 
Did you see the groups in that video? It looks like that guy needs a clip that big because he shoots so terrible it takes him 30 shots to neutralize a single threat.

So I have a new theory, big clips are great because they are for terrible shots... what we need to get rid of is those pesky 5-shot clips because people carrying those tend to be dead-on with their first shots.
 
I don't know why, but I find it a bit funny that the guy in the ad shot 17 rounds, the standard capacity for a Glock 17, from a supposed high-capacity "assault clip".
 
Last time I checked the 1st Amendment applied to the US Govt's restriction of speech. Is Youtube or the Brady Bunch the US Govt?

The video is inflammatory and feeds the fears of the pro-gun rights groups and anti gun individuals equally which means its right on target.


It was figuratively speaking, sir. However, last time I checked repression was the same as infringement.
 
Here is Lars Larson educating Paul Helmke on the difference between a "magazine" and a "clip" (time index :27 to :48)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMNMihiUW3w

Helmke, idiot that he is, still manages to get it wrong even after it's been explained to him. Anybody who is this ignorant on a particular issue should be summarily dismissed when offering his position on that topic.
 
Anyone know where I can get silhouettes like that? I've never seen them before. You think if I called Brady they'd be able to tell me where to get them? Maybe they have some extras they'll just give me...

That's about all I took from this video.
 
Funny thing is they had to buy an "assault clip" just to make the add. Wonder if they smashed it after? lol
 
It was figuratively speaking, sir. However, last time I checked repression was the same as infringement.

So does THR fall under the same category? They restrict your freedom of speech. I feel so repressed everytime I post here. LOL

:eek:

Demanding 1st Amendment protection from youtube makes no sense. No one is repressing or infringing on anyone. It is very easy to defend those who you agree with it is the test of ones principles when you can defend those who turn your stomach. Freedom only works if it applies to everyone equally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top