My wife has had a CZ-75B in 9mm for quite a while. Since I taught her to shoot it I became familiar with it and basically fell in love with it.
Based on my experience with my wife's CZ I decided to get a CZ-75B SA in .40 S&W. As it turns out I've never made a better decision regarding a pistol.
For the longest time my only .40 S&W gun has been a Glock 22. To make a long story short I've never been very good with it. I can make 2" to 3" ragged holes all the way out to 15 yards with my wife's CZ and my Sig P220. At 25 yards from an isocoles position I can keep the bullets in an 8" circle with both of those guns (my accuracy just seems to go to hell in a hand basket at 25 yds). With the Glock though I've never been able to get better than minute of man at 25 yds (B-27 target) or groups better than 4" to 6" at closer ranges. I had to be at three yds with the Glock to make the same type of ragged hole I do with the CZ and Sig out to 15 yards. I always figured the problem was a combination of the rather snappy .40 S&W and just piss poor skill on my part.
Well I'm here to tell ya it ain't piss poor skill on my part. With the CZ I'm now shooting the .40 S&W with the same accuracy levels I get with my wife's CZ and my Sig. In fact at 25 yards I am keeping the .40 rounds in a 6" circle which is pretty darn good for me and better than the other pistols I shoot.
After switching back to the Glock and getting the same poor results I used to get I'm betting the problem is the trigger. I never realized just how much the Glock trigger sucked until I had another pistol in .40 S&W to compare it to. Oh I knew the trigger couldn't compare to that of my wife's CZ or my Sig but had no idea that it could be the cause of such poor shooting on my part with the .40 S&W. The CZ SA trigger is very crisp and requires 3.5 lb pull to break (I think I got lucky here). The difference in perceived recoil between the Glock and the CZ is negligible (prior to shooting the CZ I believed that the perceived recoil difference would be considerable as the CZ is a much heavier weapon - turns out I was wrong). The negligible difference in recoil is one more reason I believe the problem with the Glock is the trigger.
The Glock always went bang when I pulled the trigger, was easy to maintain and was relatively inexpensive but it's going to get traded at the first opportunity. In fact one gunshop has already told me they'll give me $300 for it. Wonder what I should buy next?
Based on my experience with my wife's CZ I decided to get a CZ-75B SA in .40 S&W. As it turns out I've never made a better decision regarding a pistol.
For the longest time my only .40 S&W gun has been a Glock 22. To make a long story short I've never been very good with it. I can make 2" to 3" ragged holes all the way out to 15 yards with my wife's CZ and my Sig P220. At 25 yards from an isocoles position I can keep the bullets in an 8" circle with both of those guns (my accuracy just seems to go to hell in a hand basket at 25 yds). With the Glock though I've never been able to get better than minute of man at 25 yds (B-27 target) or groups better than 4" to 6" at closer ranges. I had to be at three yds with the Glock to make the same type of ragged hole I do with the CZ and Sig out to 15 yards. I always figured the problem was a combination of the rather snappy .40 S&W and just piss poor skill on my part.
Well I'm here to tell ya it ain't piss poor skill on my part. With the CZ I'm now shooting the .40 S&W with the same accuracy levels I get with my wife's CZ and my Sig. In fact at 25 yards I am keeping the .40 rounds in a 6" circle which is pretty darn good for me and better than the other pistols I shoot.
After switching back to the Glock and getting the same poor results I used to get I'm betting the problem is the trigger. I never realized just how much the Glock trigger sucked until I had another pistol in .40 S&W to compare it to. Oh I knew the trigger couldn't compare to that of my wife's CZ or my Sig but had no idea that it could be the cause of such poor shooting on my part with the .40 S&W. The CZ SA trigger is very crisp and requires 3.5 lb pull to break (I think I got lucky here). The difference in perceived recoil between the Glock and the CZ is negligible (prior to shooting the CZ I believed that the perceived recoil difference would be considerable as the CZ is a much heavier weapon - turns out I was wrong). The negligible difference in recoil is one more reason I believe the problem with the Glock is the trigger.
The Glock always went bang when I pulled the trigger, was easy to maintain and was relatively inexpensive but it's going to get traded at the first opportunity. In fact one gunshop has already told me they'll give me $300 for it. Wonder what I should buy next?