Walt Sherrill
Member
GRIZ22 said:You've also brought up NJSP had issues with extraction and ejection when testing S&Ws. Uh...maybe there was a problem with them too. You also seem to be alleging NJSP has some extraction and ejection conspiracy going on.
I'm the one who explained some of the details about the North Carolina Highway Patrol (NCHP) having problems with their M&Ps in .357 SIG. I first heard of the problem from my son, a Master Trooper (a rank) and later followed the story in the media (online and in newspapers. It was not a secret. My son is pretty proficient with most weapons, and never had problems with his M&P.
In the case of the NCHP (S&W) handguns, it did prove to be a "gun" problem rather than an ammo or shooter problem, but unlike the model of the SIG P229 used by the New Jersey State Police (NJSP), the M&Ps the NCHP used was NOT a variant of the standard M&P model -- it was just your standard M&P in .357 SIG. Production of all M&P models (and guns using the same basic design) running the .357 SIG round were discontinued soon after that debacle. Even the new M&P2, which is a revised (and arguably improved weapon) isn't presently available in .357 SIG.
We don't even know the caliber of the NJSP guns that were having problems. The fact that the suit says the NJSP has switched to Glock 19s (9mm) suggests that the SIG guns were probably 9mm, but we don't know that. Unless the P229 variant used by the NJSP is no longer being produced in that caliber, we don't know that the problem is similar to the S&W problem (which seems to be a structural issue).
I suspect that SIG will buy back the guns in question, just as S&W did, lick their wounds, identify and fix the problem for that P229 variant, and continue making and selling handguns. People seem very willing to rush to judgment, nowadays, about all matters, not just gun matters. There will probably be a head or two rolling at SIG here in the U.S....
(Did you notice in the details of the suit, that the NJSP paid $1.6 million for the guns, and roughly $800 thousand for the holsters!? While I'm truly ignorant of the cost of double or triple retention duty holsters, that still seems high!)
Note: I'm NOT a SIG fanboy. I have only one SIG -- a GrayGuns-upgraded P228 that I'm trying to sell, and its both accurate and lovely to shoot. While it's a very nice gun, I've come to realize that SIGs DO NOT* fit me well -- I generally shoot other gun better. I don't blame the gun, as SIGs appear to fit a lot of shooters VERY WELL.. (I must note, too, that a SIG P-210-6 I owned some years back remains the best-shooting, most-accurate handgun I've owned. A S&W 52-2 was a close second.)
*Those two words were omitted when i made some changes to the paragraph. Changes the meaning entirely!! Duh.
Last edited: