New RIA.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The link just gives the gun's description; no photos. I went to RIA's website and not even a mention of it there. Would be interesting to see how if it's a Colt Government .380 copy or something slightly different.
 
That is pretty neat, actually. It's a 380acp, but it looks like the first small 1911 pistol in 380acp that has a straight pull trigger. I'll have to see about getting one at some point. Thanks for the headsup.
 
MikeJackmin

Thanks for the link. Would be interested in one if it's the size of the Colt Government .380. Will go very nicely with my Colt Mustang and SIG P238.
 
I'd be down for one of these if the price is right. I like the .380. I like RIA. As long as it feeds well, I'll pick one up.

I've been in the market for a comfortable to shoot yet concealable .380 for awhile now.
 
I have a Browning BDA in .380 made by Beretta. But I'd really like to handle one of these. I wonder if they will be like the Colt Mustang.
 
RI is coming out with a new gun every time I look at their website. I still want one of those 22tcm's before anything else, I am surprised they didn't make it at least 8+1 or 9+1, in 380.
 
This 380 craze has gotten me confused. It's as if they all sat down and decided to push the 380, after everyone went to 9mm. I don't get it. As a guy who did carry a 380 for almost 20 years, from early 70's to early 90's, why are we going backwards now. The only reason back then was that 9mm guns were too large to carry comfortably, we had the walther ppk's, then if you went to 9mm it was a Hi power, or a S&W 59 or 69 after that.
There just were no small 9's or everyone would have grabbed one. Instead we had 5 shot 38's or magnums.
Now that we have all there nice compact little guns, why are they pushing us back to the 380, which may be a tiny bit smaller, but kicks more than a 9 does.
Plus they are half as powerful. It seems like it's just to make us spend money, there is no other reason that computes. They both make the same size hole is about all they have in common, and maybe if you had a human target right in front of you it might not matter ,but in real life situations it does matter. Why would one chose a 380 over a 9mm given you can get a gun in either for about the same size and cost, and the selection of ammo is far greater in 9, and less expensive. It seems like a marketing ploy more than good sense. Perhaps the TCM might even have more potential in a small gun, although someone said that you need a longer barrel for that round to work properly. 2000 FPS, is something to be reckoned with if it expanded enough to do damage, the temporary wound cavity has to be pretty darn massive.
 
There's a ".380 craze" because there's a market for them. People want them, they'll buy them, so the makers will make them. Cha-ching.
 
it would seem to be the natural progression for RIA to make a gov't or mustang type .380. the price will undoubtedly be very economical judging from their other base guns.
 
I don't have a real use for one. I already have a Mustang and a Sig. However, at the right price I would likely get one just because a miniature 1911 is kind of cool. I've almost bought one of the llamas just because they are neat little guns. I wouldn't mind seeing a "tactical" version of this with improved sights. That is the one thing that makes me prefer the sig to the mustang. I'll definitely be watching this.

However, this is the RIA I'd like to buy first though:

View attachment 699987
 
RIA is producing a double stack race gun??? Just WOW. Didn't see that one coming. Actually it makes perfect sense considering how popular practical shooting is in the Philippines.
 
I like RIA products.
The also have a proprietary cartridge, the 22 TCM. Basicly a 223 cut down in a 1911 platform. Cant wait to try it.
 
I see a real opportunity there if they can get that round to work right out of a 3 inch barreled gun, if it had stopping power. I must assume if the AR does, this should also, but where is the dividing line in barrel length to where it works as intended, possibly 4 inches?
 
I see a real opportunity there if they can get that round to work right out of a 3 inch barreled gun, if it had stopping power. I must assume if the AR does, this should also,

I'm not sure equating the 22 TCM's "stopping power" to that of an AR makes any sense at all. The parent case is a .223 case but it has been shortned significantly.

The .22 TCM is said to send a 40 grain bullet 1800 FPS. A .223 will send a 55 grain pill in excess of 3200 FPS. There are .223 loads that make in excess of 1000 FT/lbs of energy more than the .22 TCM. Long story short a .22 TCM doesn't get anywhere near .223/5.56 when it comes to terminal ballistics and making any assumptions about .22 TCM performance based on an AR doesn't make any sense. It is more comparable to the 5.7x28 cartridge. You can read ad nauseam about the "stopping power"/terminal ballistics of the 5.7 round. I wont touch that here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top