Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New S&W 642...A Little Bummed

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Phydeaux642, Jul 26, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    Well, I picked up my new 642 sans lock Wednesday. I was thinking about selling the other 642 I have with the lock, but I really hate to sell any guns right now. What to do, what to do.

    Then it dawned on me. Keep the other 642 and practice with it then carry the no-lock 642, shooting it occasionally. I would keep the same grips on them both so the feel would be the same. Sounds good.

    Tonight I went to the range and ran about 55 rounds through it. Uh-oh.This one shoots about four inches high at seven yards, while my older 642 is about right on the money. Now it would be silly to practice with the one and carry the other since they shoot differently. I know this is really a "get off me" gun, but at seven yards they should be closer than that.

    Dang it.:banghead:
     
  2. loneviking

    loneviking Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,023
    Location:
    Carson City, NV.
    Take it to a good gunsmith and get the front site adjusted so it shoots on target. If I remember right (big 'if), I think the front site would need to be filed down a bit to put the gun on target.
     
  3. 38 Super Auto

    38 Super Auto Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    Northern Indiana
    If you shorten the front sight, you'll raise the point of impact.
     
  4. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    There was a smith at the range and he said he would have to raise the front sight with a little welding and file the rear sight notch out a little. Cost - $45.00. I just hate to have to do that right out of the box. I wonder who test fired this one?
     
  5. .38 Special

    .38 Special Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Orange County, CA.
    I have a nickeled Model 21 .44 Special. It would not eject. I traced the problem to nickel build-up in the chamber mouths. A few minutes with a file sorted it, but I do not understand how this gun could have passed inspection. The gun also leaded badly, which was due to .427" ball end diameters with a .431" bore. Also fixed, but also disappointing.

    I bought a Model 22 TR in .45 Auto. Case heads drag on the recoil shield to the point that the gun cannot be cycled double action. This will be fixed under warranty -- there is warranty repair shop within driving distance -- but again I do not understand how this gun could have made it out of inspection.

    I am still a fan of S&W and intend to buy more, but it seems to me that they need to step up their quality control a bit, especially considering how much they are charging these days.
     
  6. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    At 7 yards (21 feet) I would expect the trjectory to be going up, as the sights are usually regulated to shoot to point-of-aim at 20 yards. Be that as it may, changing ammunition might bring the shots closer to where you want them without altering the gun. Do some experimenting.

    To add: If I did decide to alter the revolver, I wouldn't weld up the sight. A better way would be to remove the front sight and mill a dovetail in the rib. A dovetail-style sight could be installed that had a higher blade, and the base driven in the dovetail to correct for windage (if that was necessary). You could zero any load you wanted to use, at any distance.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2008
  7. The_Shootist

    The_Shootist Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,585
    Location:
    Richmond Tx, CSA
    Dunno

    I took my new 642 to the range on Friday and was all over the target at 7 yds. I was using 130 grn ammo and really wasn't used to the trigger. My groups did tighten towards the end of the session but by then I was out of ammo.

    Today I'm going back with 150 rds, this time of 158 gr standard pressure stuff (likely Monarch from Academy - my M85 likes it). I'll concentrate more on trigger pull and sight picture.

    I wouldn't panic or consider altering the revolver for awhile - took me 400-500 rounds through my M85 before I had it dialed in to 3-4" grps center of target at 7 yds.

    I have alot of respect for how tough it is to master a snubby and this one being smaller and lighter and brand new will take some getting used to. Great excuse for range time and ammo expense tho' :evil:
     
  8. wuchak

    wuchak Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    596
    Location:
    Shawnee, KS
    If the new one is no lock then am I correct in assuming that it's used? If so it's possible that a former owner had the front sight shortened.

    What is the difference in the trigger pull between them? If the no lock has a lighter pull than the one with the lock that could explain the difference. That extra trigger weight could be causing the barrel to drop a touch when fired. It only takes a smidge for a 3" difference.

    I'd contact S&W to see what options they can offer.
     
  9. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
    No, this is a brand spanking new 642 without the lock. It's part of the run of 4,000 that S&W did for RSR. There are some still available to dealers.

    I am going to take both guns to the range next weekend and shoot them side by side with the same ammo and see what they do.
     
  10. zinj

    zinj Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    862
    Location:
    Midwest
    I'd send it back to S&W and have them make it right.
     
  11. 351 WINCHESTER

    351 WINCHESTER Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,039
    You were shooting at night. That could be the problem. Low light. Try it in the daytime and maybe different ammo before you do anything drastic.
     
  12. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655

    I was shooting at an indoor range that has plenty of light. I shoot at this range pretty much exclusively, so, the conditions are the same year round.
     
  13. cocojo

    cocojo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    NH
    First I would try different types of ammo. Some guns like one weight while other like another. I would NOT file or add anything without first trying different ammo. Some guns need some breaking in on the rifling, when it smooths out, it changes the point of impact. Glock are know for this. Many shoot to the left when new then smooth out and shoot to point of impact. My Colts where made in the 50's and 60's when 158 lead was what they sighted these guns in for, but both my guns shoot 125 Nyclads with tight groups and to point of impact.
     
  14. Downrange

    Downrange Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59
    Location:
    VA
    I hope we don't start to see lots of QC issues with these no-lock guns. I have read that S/W basically bolted up a bunch of their old stock parts to make them...

    Let's hope this is an outlier and not a trend.
     
  15. The_Shootist

    The_Shootist Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,585
    Location:
    Richmond Tx, CSA
    Nod

    Yeah - I put another 150 rds of 158 gr standard pressure through mine today. Seems to shoot 2-3 inches to the left and about 3 inches high BUT concentrating can deliver some 4" grps at 7 yrds POA. Takes some concentrating though.

    Hope I''m still (at 270 yds total) in the dial in phase of this revolver. I've got two boxes of my carry load (BB Standard pressure .38's - a VERY accurate load) arriving for testing and 1000 rds of Ga Arms 158 gr +P round on order. As well by next weekend, I'll probably be shooting with some Secret Service grips I ordered from Eagle Grips.

    If improvement in minimal then I might even try some Pachmayer Concealment Grips, which I have on both my SP 101 and my M85, with excellent results. If those don't work, then i'll be bummed out. :uhoh:

    This revolver is just too easy to carry not to give a rigorous dial in period, but eventually you have to face reality. It would be ironic if I went back to my M85 or SP 101 for carry - those two revolvers I have absolute confidence in my ability to be accurate with.
     
  16. woodsltc

    woodsltc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    Tennessee
    IMO, "Old Fuff" and "cocojo" gave you the correct advise before you do anything else. Look for the simple solution first!!

    Don
     
  17. HB

    HB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,329
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I don't think that trajectory would be that extreme, but different ammo might help. It seems like you are on the right track.

    HB
     
  18. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    STOP~!

    My suggestion is- DO NOT SELL ANY PERSONAL FIREARMS RIGHT NOW~!

    The political race is "up in the air" at best; and NO ONE can clearly see
    the outcome of the November Presidential election. If anything, we need
    to be buying more firearms and stockpiling plenty of ammunition~! ;) :D
     
  19. weisse52

    weisse52 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,341
    Location:
    Bountiful, Utah
    There is NO excuse for a brand new Smith to be shooting like that. If I was you I would dump that POS ASAP!






    Just send it to me and I will get rid of it for you.....:evil:


    I would have loved to have gotten my hands on one of those. I would do what I needed to do to get it shooting to POA. Your idea of shooting one and carrying the other sounds perfect.
     
  20. Phydeaux642

    Phydeaux642 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,655
  21. Rugerlvr

    Rugerlvr Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,145
    Location:
    Utah
    weisse52, run, do not walk, to FBMG in Draper. As of this morning, they had 2 of the no-lock 642's available.
     
  22. Rugerlvr

    Rugerlvr Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,145
    Location:
    Utah
    btw Phydeaux, Crimson Trace grips would solve your aiming problem... :D
     
  23. weisse52

    weisse52 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,341
    Location:
    Bountiful, Utah
    Thanks. On my way to FBMG! I was looking for an excuse anyway.
     
  24. Turk

    Turk Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    201
    Location:
    USA
    I recently purchased a 642 for my wife's CCW (when I can finally convince her to take the classes). Shooting GD 125 LEO ammo it shoots on once you get used to the trigger which is very heavy. I have A CT sight on it and it really helped in dry firing this heavy trigger. I plan to send it off to lessen the the trigger pull. I wanted the DAO but this puppy has heavy trigger pull.

    Turk
     
  25. Rugerlvr

    Rugerlvr Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,145
    Location:
    Utah
    So, wiesse, did you get one?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page