Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New SA58 Para FAL -- first impressions and pics

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by iamkris, Jul 17, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    As I mentioned in a previous thread, my DSA SA58 Para FAL was delivered late last week after 20 weeks on order. I filled out the paperwork over the weekend and picked up the rifle today. http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=288159&highlight=sa58+para

    I'm always excited by a new toy and this one especially, as its brother, my DSA StG58A, is my go-to rifle...even over my M1A, PTR91 or AR15s. This one hs the potential to be my undisputed champion, go anywhere, do anything rifle. Here's a first few pics.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    In addition to the standard stuff, I ordered these upgrades to the rifle:
    • SAW grip
    • Extended safety selector
    • Handguard rail
    • Phantom flash hider
    • Extended bolt hold open
    • Extended mag release
    • Sand-cut bolt carrier
    • Para tactical aperature sight
    • Extended Extreme Duty scope mount
    • EoTech 511

    First impressions:
    • Dang, but this thing is handy. While it isn't really much shorter than other full size rifles I have, the weight distribution is all in the center making it FEEL more compact
    • All controls are extremely crisp in function
    • The trigger is the nicest I've ever seen on a FAL. Fairly light, crisp let off. There is a fair amount of travel and creep in the first stage...overall much better than I expected.
    • The build quality is typical DSA...flawless machining and finishing
    • The Extreme Duty scope mount is very nice...good build, clear T markings...a high quality piece and seems rock solid
    • The font Beligian style handguards are a little cheaper in material than I thought...they have a gap at the top
    • The handguard rail was a bit of a disappointment since it cost $25...I could get the same thing for less than $10 from CDNN
    • FALs are beautiful EBRs

    Ever wonder how big some of these rifles are in comparison to one another? Here's some size comparisons to a standard sized StG58A, an M1A, a PTR91 with a collapsible stock, a folding stock AK and an M4-gery. The Para compares very well in size...and it's an FAL so it is superior :D

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Hopefully I'll get out to shoot it this weekend...range report to follow
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2007
  2. camslam

    camslam Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    741
    Location:
    Chilling Out in the Valley of The Sun
    Sweet gun and sweet guns. I'll be getting a DSA FAL SA58 later this year and I am stoked. I'm still trying to decide between the full size or carbine, but I think I'll come out a winner either way.

    Give us the follow up after taking it to the range.
     
  3. cameron.personal

    cameron.personal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    369
    Great post, awesome looking FAL!

    I am very interested to read how it shoots, especially in regard to zeroing.

    Here is mine...

    [​IMG]

    Cameron
     
  4. JonB

    JonB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    Tampa
    Love those FAL's. I really need to get one of those. Nice looking rifles gentlemen.
     
  5. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    cameron.personal

    What kind of scope is that? I have the EoTech on it now but the idea of a little bit of magnification when needed for longer range is appealing, while still retaining the dot for close up work. I've seen good stuff about the IOR scopes but they are quite spendy ($850-1200+). One of the decent-looking alternatives (if you don't need the CQB rangefinding recticle) is this Burris which runs around $500

    1-4 x 24mm Black Diamond

    [​IMG]

    3P#4 Illuminated recticle (I like this one)

    [​IMG]

    3P#4 E-Dot (also nice)

    [​IMG]
     
  6. jagdpanzer347

    jagdpanzer347 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    744
    Location:
    Southwest Ohio
    Congrats on a fine rifle and a fine collection, Kris. I know my DSA STG58C was well worth the wait. For my next project I'm looking to put together an Izzy-inspired light barrel. At some point I surely would like to get a Para, and a G1 and......... man, those FALs can be addictive. Enjoy your new rifle and happy shooting.

    -jagd
     
  7. cameron.personal

    cameron.personal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    369
    I have the IOR Valdada (from DSA for $695) 1.1-4 x 26 with the illuminated CQB reticle.
    This reticle is similar in design to the ACOG allowing (at 4x) range finding and BDC out to 800 meters.

    Here is the reticle...
    [​IMG]

    A buddy and I got one each for my FAL and his middy AR and they are awesome scopes for the price, a friend has they more expensive Leupold SPR 1.5-5 and I think the IOR is a great value in comparison.

    http://www.valdada.com/vn/ior/03k Just be aware that Valdada's website sucks and doesn't show the correct reticle options.

    Here it is on DSA's site http://www.dsarms.com/prodinfo.asp?number=VT11426CQB

    [​IMG]

    So far I am VERY HAPPY with the scope.
    Cameron
     
  8. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    Wow! DSA is selling them for less (by about $150) than SWFA...that puts the IOR back in the running. I really liked that scope but couldn't see dropping that kind of coin...still, $700 for a scope is WAY mre than I've paid in the past. What is the rangefinding recticle calibated to? Are those holdover bars?

    Some more impressions now that I've played with it overnight
    • I was originally going to put a vertical grip on this...I don't think I will. Something about the weight distribution says that this rifle needs to be handled in a traditional manner on the forearm.
    • Based on that, I'm going to move the rail up to the side to mount a weapons light. Hopefully that will solve the "gap" at the seam of the top of the handguards
    • The folding stock is AWESOME...rock solid.
    • The cheeckweld with the folding stock for iron sights is excellent. I'm adding a ITC cheeckpiece to get the proper weld with the EoTech
    • FALs are beautiful EBRs
     
  9. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,083
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Nice weapon, nieghbor. Buy them cheap and stack them deep.:)
     
  10. Gunfixr

    Gunfixr Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Messages:
    84
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    I have a vertical grip on my shorty and like it, but it's personal preference. However, that rail looks awful far forward for a grip, you'd have to have gorilla arms to reach the grip.
     
  11. Coronach

    Coronach Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    11,109
    How fast is it for CQB use? The IOR scope, I mean.

    Mike
     
  12. BigSoundRacing

    BigSoundRacing Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    202
    Cameron,

    Thanks for the suggestion on the scope - been trying to decide what to place on the FAL and that really looks nice.

    Ordered my second from DSA yesterday.

    Be safe, BSR
     
  13. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I've only had the opportunity to shoot a couple FALs, but from those experiences, I'm sure you'll enjoy this new addition! Congrats & I look forward to seeing pics from you first range session.
     
  14. cameron.personal

    cameron.personal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    369
    Very, the horseshoe reticle is great.
     
  15. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,766
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Beautiful rifle iamkris. Best of luck with it.

    Good choices on the options. I have a bunch of those parts on my FAL too.

    Is that a 16" or 18" barrel?

    That DSA alloy lower makes a huge difference with a shortened barrel. I added one to my 17", changing over from a full stock on a surplus Imbel lower. The difference in feel and balance was night and day.
     
  16. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    Thankee. It's a 16"

    Well, I was going to cut out and break it in on Friday afternoon but a vendor just called and gave me 4 tickets, 10 rows up, just behind home plate for the Cubs game on Friday afternoon. I'm taking my kids.

    I'll shoot it this weekend.
     
  17. Hutch

    Hutch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,675
    Location:
    Opelika, AL
    What is that rear sight? I'd like to get one. Does it replace the orignal rear w/o 'smithing, or does it require alteration?
     
  18. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,766
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    It will replace the original sight. There were lots of variations of the FAL though. You may need to swap your front sight post with one of a different height.

    [​IMG]
    http://www.dsarms.com/prodinfo.asp?number=DSA110
     
  19. FN/form

    FN/form Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    19
    For CQB rifles I'd recommend something you can mount well forward. CQB by definition necessitates a wide field of view. Looking down a tube close to your eye is a detriment. Magnification can be a CQB detriment, as well.

    Think EOTech and Aimpoint.

    Extended range--well, the definition of that is up to you. Just make sure thick reticle lines (meant for faster acquisition) don't obscure hold-over view.


    -josh
     
  20. cameron.personal

    cameron.personal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    369
    I was just running drills today with my DSA and the 1.1-4 IOR mentioned above. With both eyes open the field of view is great and the time on splits is excellent. I ran a drill with a 14.5" M4 type with a forward mounted EOTech and then the 16.25" FAL type with the IOR variable power scope. With the CQB horeshoe reticle the FAL was just as fast as the EOTech.

    When I moved the the 100 yards line and dialed in the 4 power the FAL makes the M4 look like a toy.... I good mid range variable power optic makes a lot of sense on a .308 carbine sized rifle.

    Cameron
     
  21. RockyMtnTactical

    RockyMtnTactical Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,539
    Very nice. I have a soft spot in my heart for FAL's... I am contemplating building another one...
     
  22. cameron.personal

    cameron.personal Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Messages:
    369
    I can't resist I took a couple of pics after the range session today...


    [​IMG]
     
  23. Grayrider

    Grayrider Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    997
    Location:
    Missouri Ozarks
    Kris,

    Glad to hear you got your SA58, and thank you for the great review! I think the size comparison pictures really illustrate how handy the SA58 carbine is in comparison to other rifles. That combined with the soft recoil of the FAL makes for a battle rifle that can easily cover the role of a carbine in 5.56 or 7.62x39.

    When you go to the range remember that we do suggest 400-500 round break-in, although in my experience that mainly applies to Duracoated guns. Oil the heck out of it too as I have seen a few ship pretty dry. The gun I got after the NRA Convention where we met was bone dry. I oiled the heck out of it and never had to really break it in as there were no malfunctions out of the box. My Para took about 200-300 rounds to shake down fully, and again was Duracoated.

    Please get in touch if I can be of further assistance, and let us know how it shoots!

    John

    PS: I just setup an ORF AK-74 in almost an identical configuration to the AK you posted above. Great minds think alike!
     
  24. iamkris

    iamkris Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    2,839
    Location:
    My own little slice of Purgatory
    Thanks John.

    I've had her out...really lubed up too...I noticed how dry it was when shipped. I'm still a fan of this rifle although I've only had it out for a sight-in session. Here's my range report. http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=292567&highlight=sa58+para

    I've also added a few things...now she looks like this
    • Israeli forward assist charging handle (might as well put that sand cut bolt carrier to good use)
    • GG&G Accucam QD mount for the EoTech
    • ITC cheekrest
    • Viking weapons light mount
    • Surefire G2 torch

    [​IMG]


    Accuracy seems decent but I've only had it out to 50 for sighting in purposes...haven't wrung her out at 100/200 yet. The elevation difference is my monkeying around with the front sight setting. That's SA surplus.

    [​IMG]

    Trying to figure out how to attach this to my signature

    [​IMG]
     
  25. Grayrider

    Grayrider Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    997
    Location:
    Missouri Ozarks
    That just about sums it up. I am down to one AR now...

    :)

    Of course I won't mention my 5.56 AKs....

    John
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page