Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New York Discussion in Progress

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Trent, Jan 15, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
  2. MSgtEgress

    MSgtEgress Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    159
  3. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    This debate on the floor is interesting.

    The gun control advocate is getting grilled. Hard.
     
  4. Russ Jackson

    Russ Jackson member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    564
    You can sit and watch your rights taken away.
     
  5. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    HAHAHAH

    There's no frigging LAW ENFORCEMENT exclusion.

    They'll have to amend this bill in the future to give police offers back more than 7 rounds.
     
  6. greenmtnguy

    greenmtnguy Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    305
    Location:
    New England
    Nope, I think that any law enforcement officers should HAVE to comply with whatever the law requires of its citizens. Wouldn't want the possibility of a retired LEO or anyone else from getting their hands on one of those highly dangerous 10 (or more) round magazines a year down the road, now, would we?!?

    OK, sarcasm off. But seriously, I think the police will all make a big complaint and it will serve to highlight the stupidity of those who rammed this lame-brained bill through in the middle of the night.
     
  7. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    Security guards and other types are NOT exempted under this bill, they only plan on making peace officers exempt.
     
  8. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    Steve Katz is blasting them for circumventing New York constitution on proper vetting of bills.
     
  9. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    HAHA

    YOU CAN BET that this bill will make ME a criminal because before I leave for work to come upstate and represent my constituents, I *WILL* leave more than 7 bullets in my gun for my wife to protect herself with.

    Steve Katz is pounding them.
     
  10. Jorg Nysgerrig

    Jorg Nysgerrig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,823
    Dan Losquadro is doing a good job discussing this.
     
  11. Russ Jackson

    Russ Jackson member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    564
    Thieves in the night.
     
  12. raddiver

    raddiver Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    215
    Location:
    Louisville Kentucky
    Jorg,
    Now that he's debating the bill he is. Before that on the clarification, it was just semantics.
     
  13. freyasman

    freyasman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    275
    Is there any way to watch this other than the OP's link? I'm not having any luck with the streaming video...
     
  14. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    James Tedisco is knocking it out of the bloody park.

    Oh my god.

    This guy is GOOD.
     
  15. Grassman

    Grassman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,778
    Location:
    Texas
    +1..... it will fall on deaf ears.
     
  16. raddiver

    raddiver Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    215
    Location:
    Louisville Kentucky
    Now Tedisco is doing a good job in my opinion.
     
  17. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    Oh man that guy needs to run for President.

    He's GOOD.
     
  18. dom1104

    dom1104 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,366
    This is so awesome.

    Next up is "Public Hearing: The Impact of New York State's "I Love New York" Brand Redevelopment"

    I can watch New Yorkers have their guns taken away in real time, and nobody seems to know what they are talking about.

    "If you have a magazine with only seven bullets, it will limit the number of people you can unlawfully kill."

    "What should a home owner do in a home invasion scenario?"

    "Change the clip, and call the cops."
     
  19. bigfatdave

    bigfatdave Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,961
    Location:
    Near Camp Perry
    Who's the idiot who defends a 7x limit by saying that the home-defender can "change the clip"?

    Does that booger-eating moron NOT realize that criminals can "change the clip", too?

    And I'm donating to Tedisco's campaign fund!
    EDIT: That's McLaughlin, I think.
     
  20. Trent

    Trent Resident Wiseguy

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2010
    Messages:
    17,608
    Location:
    Illinois
    Doesn't that equally apply to people killing people mercilessly?

    BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG

    Change clip

    BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG

    Change clip

    BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG

    Change clip

    BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG

    (Cops are still 5 minutes away)

    Change clip

    BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG

    Change clip

    BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG
     
  21. Skribs

    Skribs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,807
    Location:
    Lakewood, Washington
    So they recognize that a homeowner can reload, but not the criminal? When it is likely the homeowner will only have one mag loaded, and the criminal will bring a backpack full?
     
  22. Grassman

    Grassman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,778
    Location:
    Texas
    Steven Mclaughlin nails it!!
     
  23. Grassman

    Grassman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,778
    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah, don't think the gun grabber liked that on! He got owned.
     
  24. Jorg Nysgerrig

    Jorg Nysgerrig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,823
    That was just mind-boggling. The 7-round limit will prevent a bad guy from illegally hurting a lot of people, but a good guy can just swap clips.
     
  25. phoglund

    phoglund Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    777
    Location:
    The Bozone
    New York Assembly discussion

    Listening to the debate in the New York State Assembly, the current discussion is about a limit change from 10 rounds to 7 rounds in a magazine. The opponent asked why, the reply was, "So you can illegally kill fewer people with one magazine." Note, if you already owned a magazine that carried 10 rounds, all you had to do to comply with the law is only put 7 rounds in the magazine.

    Can these people really not see the disconnect??

    I mean, what's the likely hood if you were going to perpetrate an illegal killing...you would only put 7 rounds in the magazine, so you didn't break the law?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page